Skip to main content
VulnerabilityPublished Updated

CVE-2026-23868: giflib security update

Affects giflibSource GCVE Database

0

Not known to be exploited : upgrade to 5.2.1-9.el9_7.1 soon.

Data as of 27 Oct 2026, 00:16 UTC

Severity
High

Rated High by Threat Radar's AI analysis · No CVSS score from NVD or the CNA

Patch
Available – fixed in 5.2.1-9.el9_7.1

Exploitation evidence

  1. Disclosed: evidence found.

    CVE published 20 Apr 2026

  2. Detectable: no evidence on record.

    No public nuclei template indexed

  3. Weaponised: no evidence on record.

    No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB

  4. Exploited in the wild: no evidence on record.

    Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation

  5. Observed by OffSeq Mirage: no evidence on record.

    No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

What to do

Upgrade the AlmaLinux to 5.2.1-9.el9_7.1.

Affected software

ProductAffectedFixed in
AlmaLinux 9giflibAffected
  • <5.2.1-9.el9_7.1
Fixed in
  • 5.2.1-9.el9_7.1
AlmaLinux 9giflib-develAffected
  • <5.2.1-9.el9_7.1
Fixed in
  • 5.2.1-9.el9_7.1

Check your own hosts for these packages with threat-finder (opens in a new tab), our free open-source scanner.

AI-suggested

A security update fixing this vulnerability is available in giflib version 5.2.1-9.el9_7.1. Users should apply this update promptly to remediate the issue. Refer to the Red Hat advisory and update instructions at https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258 for detailed guidance.

Description

A double-free vulnerability in giflib, a library for reading and writing GIF images, can lead to memory corruption. This issue is tracked as CVE-2026-23868. A security update fixing this vulnerability is available in giflib version 5.2.1-9.el9_7.1. The vulnerability has been rated as Important by Red Hat Product Security.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…