Investigation Report: APT36 Malware Campaign Using Desktop Entry Files and Google Drive Payload Delivery
Investigation Report: APT36 Malware Campaign Using Desktop Entry Files and Google Drive Payload Delivery
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
The reported threat involves a malware campaign attributed to the advanced persistent threat group APT36, also known as Operation C-Major. This campaign utilizes a combination of social engineering and sophisticated malware delivery techniques to compromise target systems. Specifically, the attackers employ phishing (MITRE ATT&CK T1566) to deliver malicious desktop entry files, which are commonly used in Linux desktop environments to launch applications. These files are crafted to masquerade as legitimate files (T1036) and leverage scripting capabilities (T1064) to execute malicious payloads. The payloads themselves are hosted and delivered via Google Drive, a legitimate cloud service, which helps evade detection by blending in with normal network traffic (T1071). The malware also uses techniques such as hidden files and directories (T1564.001), binary padding (T1027.001) to obfuscate its presence, and may install itself as a Windows service (T1543.003) to maintain persistence. Additional tactics include brute force attempts (T1110) to gain access, software discovery (T1518) to enumerate the environment, and ingress tool transfer (T1105) to download additional tools or payloads. The use of non-standard ports (T1571) and non-application layer protocols (T1095) further complicates detection and mitigation efforts. The campaign's medium severity rating reflects the moderate certainty (50%) of the intelligence and the complexity of the attack chain, which requires user interaction (phishing) but can lead to significant compromise if successful. No patches are available as this is a malware campaign rather than a software vulnerability, and no known exploits in the wild have been reported yet. The threat leverages a broad range of tactics to infiltrate, persist, and move laterally within targeted networks.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, this threat poses a significant risk primarily through social engineering and malware infection vectors. The use of phishing emails with malicious desktop entry files can lead to initial compromise, especially in environments where users have elevated privileges or where endpoint security controls are insufficient. Once inside, the malware's persistence mechanisms and obfuscation techniques can allow attackers to maintain long-term access, potentially leading to data exfiltration, espionage, or disruption of services. Organizations in sectors with high-value intellectual property or sensitive data, such as government, defense, energy, and critical infrastructure, are particularly at risk. The use of Google Drive for payload delivery complicates network-based detection, as traffic to this service is typically allowed and trusted. Additionally, the campaign's ability to use non-standard ports and protocols may bypass traditional firewall and intrusion detection systems. The medium severity suggests that while the threat is not currently widespread or fully confirmed, the potential impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability is considerable if the attack succeeds.
Mitigation Recommendations
European organizations should implement targeted defenses beyond generic advice. First, enhance email security by deploying advanced phishing detection solutions that analyze attachments and links, including sandboxing desktop entry files and other script-based payloads. User awareness training should emphasize the risks of opening unexpected or suspicious files, especially those with uncommon extensions like .desktop. Endpoint detection and response (EDR) tools should be configured to monitor for suspicious scripting activity, service creation events, and the presence of hidden files or directories. Network monitoring should include anomaly detection for unusual outbound connections, particularly to cloud storage services like Google Drive, and the use of non-standard ports or protocols. Implement strict application whitelisting to prevent unauthorized execution of scripts and binaries. Multi-factor authentication and strong password policies can mitigate brute force attempts. Regularly audit and restrict user privileges to limit the impact of a successful compromise. Finally, establish incident response plans that include procedures for malware containment and forensic analysis to quickly identify and remediate infections.
Affected Countries
United Kingdom, Germany, France, Italy, Spain, Netherlands, Belgium, Poland
Indicators of Compromise
- domain: seemysitelive.store
- ip: 164.215.103.55
- url: ws://seemysitelive.store:8080/ws
- ip: 45.155.54.28
- file: PROCUREMENT_OF_MANPORTABLE_&_COMPAC.pdf.zip
- hash: 6ac0fe0fa5d9af8193610d710a7da63c
- hash: 3e3169c513c02126028480421fb341a167cb9fcd
- hash: 34ad45374d5f5059cad65e7057ec0f3e468f00234be7c34de033093efc4dd83d
- file: PROCUREMENT_OF_MANPORTABLE_\&_COMPAC.pdf.desktop
- hash: a484f85d132609a4a6b5ed65ece7d331
- hash: 1982f09bfab3a6688bb80249a079db1a759214b7
- hash: 6347f46d77a47b90789a1209b8f573b2529a6084f858a27d977bf23ee8a79113
- hash: 566ddd4eb4ca8d4dd67b72ee7f944055
- hash: df4db969a69efc1db59f4d3c596ed590ee059777
- hash: 7a946339439eb678316a124b8d700b21de919c81ee5bef33e8cb848b7183927b
Investigation Report: APT36 Malware Campaign Using Desktop Entry Files and Google Drive Payload Delivery
Description
Investigation Report: APT36 Malware Campaign Using Desktop Entry Files and Google Drive Payload Delivery
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
The reported threat involves a malware campaign attributed to the advanced persistent threat group APT36, also known as Operation C-Major. This campaign utilizes a combination of social engineering and sophisticated malware delivery techniques to compromise target systems. Specifically, the attackers employ phishing (MITRE ATT&CK T1566) to deliver malicious desktop entry files, which are commonly used in Linux desktop environments to launch applications. These files are crafted to masquerade as legitimate files (T1036) and leverage scripting capabilities (T1064) to execute malicious payloads. The payloads themselves are hosted and delivered via Google Drive, a legitimate cloud service, which helps evade detection by blending in with normal network traffic (T1071). The malware also uses techniques such as hidden files and directories (T1564.001), binary padding (T1027.001) to obfuscate its presence, and may install itself as a Windows service (T1543.003) to maintain persistence. Additional tactics include brute force attempts (T1110) to gain access, software discovery (T1518) to enumerate the environment, and ingress tool transfer (T1105) to download additional tools or payloads. The use of non-standard ports (T1571) and non-application layer protocols (T1095) further complicates detection and mitigation efforts. The campaign's medium severity rating reflects the moderate certainty (50%) of the intelligence and the complexity of the attack chain, which requires user interaction (phishing) but can lead to significant compromise if successful. No patches are available as this is a malware campaign rather than a software vulnerability, and no known exploits in the wild have been reported yet. The threat leverages a broad range of tactics to infiltrate, persist, and move laterally within targeted networks.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, this threat poses a significant risk primarily through social engineering and malware infection vectors. The use of phishing emails with malicious desktop entry files can lead to initial compromise, especially in environments where users have elevated privileges or where endpoint security controls are insufficient. Once inside, the malware's persistence mechanisms and obfuscation techniques can allow attackers to maintain long-term access, potentially leading to data exfiltration, espionage, or disruption of services. Organizations in sectors with high-value intellectual property or sensitive data, such as government, defense, energy, and critical infrastructure, are particularly at risk. The use of Google Drive for payload delivery complicates network-based detection, as traffic to this service is typically allowed and trusted. Additionally, the campaign's ability to use non-standard ports and protocols may bypass traditional firewall and intrusion detection systems. The medium severity suggests that while the threat is not currently widespread or fully confirmed, the potential impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability is considerable if the attack succeeds.
Mitigation Recommendations
European organizations should implement targeted defenses beyond generic advice. First, enhance email security by deploying advanced phishing detection solutions that analyze attachments and links, including sandboxing desktop entry files and other script-based payloads. User awareness training should emphasize the risks of opening unexpected or suspicious files, especially those with uncommon extensions like .desktop. Endpoint detection and response (EDR) tools should be configured to monitor for suspicious scripting activity, service creation events, and the presence of hidden files or directories. Network monitoring should include anomaly detection for unusual outbound connections, particularly to cloud storage services like Google Drive, and the use of non-standard ports or protocols. Implement strict application whitelisting to prevent unauthorized execution of scripts and binaries. Multi-factor authentication and strong password policies can mitigate brute force attempts. Regularly audit and restrict user privileges to limit the impact of a successful compromise. Finally, establish incident response plans that include procedures for malware containment and forensic analysis to quickly identify and remediate infections.
Affected Countries
For access to advanced analysis and higher rate limits, contact root@offseq.com
Technical Details
- Uuid
- 957de389-e7a6-4e1b-87b3-a7b5e94d3c34
- Original Timestamp
- 1755864522
Indicators of Compromise
Domain
Value | Description | Copy |
---|---|---|
domainseemysitelive.store | — |
Ip
Value | Description | Copy |
---|---|---|
ip164.215.103.55 | — | |
ip45.155.54.28 | seemysitelive.store: Enriched via the dns module |
Url
Value | Description | Copy |
---|---|---|
urlws://seemysitelive.store:8080/ws | — |
File
Value | Description | Copy |
---|---|---|
filePROCUREMENT_OF_MANPORTABLE_&_COMPAC.pdf.zip | — | |
filePROCUREMENT_OF_MANPORTABLE_\&_COMPAC.pdf.desktop | — |
Hash
Value | Description | Copy |
---|---|---|
hash6ac0fe0fa5d9af8193610d710a7da63c | — | |
hash3e3169c513c02126028480421fb341a167cb9fcd | — | |
hash34ad45374d5f5059cad65e7057ec0f3e468f00234be7c34de033093efc4dd83d | — | |
hasha484f85d132609a4a6b5ed65ece7d331 | — | |
hash1982f09bfab3a6688bb80249a079db1a759214b7 | — | |
hash6347f46d77a47b90789a1209b8f573b2529a6084f858a27d977bf23ee8a79113 | — | |
hash566ddd4eb4ca8d4dd67b72ee7f944055 | — | |
hashdf4db969a69efc1db59f4d3c596ed590ee059777 | — | |
hash7a946339439eb678316a124b8d700b21de919c81ee5bef33e8cb848b7183927b | — |
Threat ID: 68a8a9b3ad5a09ad0020bc3d
Added to database: 8/22/2025, 5:32:35 PM
Last enriched: 9/15/2025, 12:50:36 AM
Last updated: 10/6/2025, 10:14:46 AM
Views: 108
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
YUREI RANSOMWARE: THE DIGITAL GHOST
MediumThreatFox IOCs for 2025-10-05
MediumUnder the Pure Curtain: From RAT to Builder to Coder
MediumThreatFox IOCs for 2025-10-04
MediumShinyHunters Launches Data Leak Site: Trinity of Chaos Announces New Ransomware Victims
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis are available only with a Pro account. Contact root@offseq.com for access.
External Links
Need enhanced features?
Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.