VulnerabilityPublished 13 Aug 2026Updated 10 Oct 2026

CVE-2025-50181: Osc cli · urllib3 redirects are not disabled when retries are disabled on PoolManager instantiation

Affects osc-cliSource GCVE Database

Compare

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 5.3 Medium : upgrade to 1.11.0_9 when convenient.

Data as of 1 Nov 2026, 22:57 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

5.3Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.4% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 40% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
Patch: Available – fixed in 2.37.10_2, 0.48.1_2, 1.48.0 +3

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: High
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: None
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality: High
Integrity: None
Availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: High: A successful attack depends on conditions beyond the attacker's control. That is, a successful attack cannot be accomplished at will, but requires the attacker to invest in some measurable amount of effort in preparation or execution against the vulnerable component before a successful attack can be expected. For example, a successful attack may require an attacker to: gather knowledge about the environment in which the vulnerable target/component exists; prepare the target environment to improve exploit reliability; or inject themselves into the logical network path between the target and the resource requested by the victim in order to read and/or modify network communications (e.g., a man in the middle attack).
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker is authorized with (i.e., requires) privileges that provide basic user capabilities that could normally affect only settings and files owned by a user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges may have the ability to cause an impact only to non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without any interaction from any user.
Scope: Unchanged: An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
Confidentiality: High: There is total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all resources within the impacted component being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact.
Integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the impacted component.
Availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 13 Aug 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponized: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 1 Nov 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponized: A Metasploit exploit module or Exploit-DB entry exists (Metasploit scanner modules do not count), or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Upgrade to a fixed release listed under Affected software.

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
Homebrewlocust`pkg:brew/locust`Other threats	Affected >=2.2.1 <2.37.10_2	Fixed in 2.37.10_2
Homebrewtoot`pkg:brew/toot`Other threats	Affected >=0.26.0 <0.48.1_2	Fixed in 0.48.1_2
Homebrewggshield`pkg:brew/ggshield`Other threats	Affected >=1.19.1 <1.48.0	Fixed in 1.48.0
Homebrewrobot-framework`pkg:brew/robot-framework`Other threats	Affected <7.4.2_2	Fixed in 7.4.2_2
Homebrewparliament`pkg:brew/parliament`Other threats	Affected >=1.3.1 <1.6.4_1	Fixed in 1.6.4_1
Homebrewosc-cli`pkg:brew/osc-cli`Other threats	Affected >=1.6 <1.11.0_9	Fixed in 1.11.0_9

Check your own hosts for these packages with threat-finder (opens in a new tab), our free open-source scanner.

AI-suggested

A patch is available to address this vulnerability. Users should upgrade to a patched version of urllib3. Alternatively, redirects should be disabled at the request() level rather than relying on disabling them via the retries parameter on PoolManager instantiation. Organizations using urllib3 1.x can contact the maintainer for support or contribution opportunities.

Description

CVE-2025-50181 is a vulnerability in the osc-cli product related to urllib3's handling of redirects when retries are disabled on PoolManager instantiation. The retries parameter intended to disable redirects at the PoolManager level is ignored, causing redirects to remain enabled. This can leave applications vulnerable to SSRF or open redirect attacks if they rely on disabling redirects at this level. The vulnerability affects specific versions of osc-cli and related packages. A patch is available to fix this issue.

Impact

Applications that disable redirects at the PoolManager level to mitigate SSRF or open redirect vulnerabilities will remain vulnerable because redirects are not actually disabled. This could allow attackers to exploit redirects in SSRF attacks. The vulnerability does not affect requests and botocore users by default. The CVSS score is 5.3 (medium severity) with high confidentiality impact but no integrity or availability impact.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 10 Oct 2026, 21:51 UTC

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats