Malicious PyPI Package Impersonates SymPy, Deploys XMRig Miner on Linux Hosts
A new malicious package discovered in the Python Package Index (PyPI) has been found to impersonate a popular library for symbolic mathematics to deploy malicious payloads, including a cryptocurrency miner, on Linux hosts. The package, named sympy-dev, mimics SymPy, replicating the latter's project description verbatim in an attempt to deceive unsuspecting users into thinking that they are
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
The threat involves a malicious Python package named sympy-dev uploaded to the Python Package Index (PyPI) that impersonates the widely used SymPy library, a symbolic mathematics package. The attacker replicated the legitimate project's description verbatim to deceive users into installing what appears to be a development version of SymPy. Once installed on Linux hosts, the package modifies certain polynomial functions to act as a downloader for a cryptocurrency miner payload. When these functions are invoked, they retrieve a remote JSON configuration and download an ELF binary payload from a threat actor-controlled IP address (63.250.56[.]54). The payload is executed directly in memory using Linux's memfd_create and /proc/self/fd mechanisms, which prevents leaving forensic artifacts on disk and complicates detection. The downloaded binaries run the XMRig miner configured to mine Monero cryptocurrency using CPU resources exclusively, connecting to Stratum over TLS endpoints on port 3333 controlled by the attacker. This cryptojacking campaign leverages a supply chain attack vector, exploiting the trust developers place in PyPI packages. The implant also functions as a general-purpose loader capable of fetching and executing arbitrary code under the Python process's privileges, increasing the potential attack surface beyond mining. The package has been downloaded over 1,100 times since its publication on January 17, 2026, indicating a non-trivial exposure. The attack is stealthy, activating only when specific functions are called, which helps evade casual detection. The technique of in-memory execution and use of legitimate package impersonation reflects advanced tactics seen in prior campaigns like FritzFrog and Mimo. The package remains available on PyPI, posing ongoing risk to Python developers and organizations using Linux systems.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, this threat poses several risks. First, cryptojacking consumes CPU resources, degrading system performance and increasing operational costs, especially in large-scale Linux server environments common in European enterprises. Second, the malicious package undermines software supply chain integrity, potentially compromising development workflows and production systems if the package is used in automated pipelines or container builds. Third, the implant's capability to execute arbitrary code under Python process privileges could lead to further compromise, data exfiltration, or lateral movement within networks. Organizations relying heavily on Python for scientific computing, data analysis, or web services on Linux are particularly vulnerable. The stealthy nature of the attack, including in-memory execution and conditional triggering, complicates detection and remediation efforts. This could delay incident response and increase the window of exposure. Additionally, the persistence of the package on PyPI means new victims may continue to be infected. The reputational damage and potential regulatory implications under GDPR for failing to secure software supply chains and prevent unauthorized resource use are also concerns for European entities.
Mitigation Recommendations
European organizations should implement strict controls on third-party Python package usage. This includes enforcing the use of trusted package sources and verifying package authenticity through cryptographic signatures or hash checks before installation. Employing tools like PyPI package reputation scanners and dependency vulnerability analyzers can help detect suspicious packages. Monitoring network traffic for unusual connections to known malicious IPs or Stratum mining pools (e.g., port 3333 over TLS) can identify active cryptomining. Endpoint detection solutions should be configured to detect in-memory execution techniques and anomalous Python process behaviors. Integrating runtime application self-protection (RASP) or behavior-based anomaly detection can help identify conditional malicious code execution. Organizations should also educate developers about the risks of installing unverified packages and encourage the use of virtual environments with strict dependency controls. Regular audits of installed packages and automated alerts for new or unexpected dependencies are recommended. Finally, reporting and collaborating with PyPI maintainers to remove malicious packages promptly is critical to reducing exposure.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Italy, Spain, Poland, Sweden
Malicious PyPI Package Impersonates SymPy, Deploys XMRig Miner on Linux Hosts
Description
A new malicious package discovered in the Python Package Index (PyPI) has been found to impersonate a popular library for symbolic mathematics to deploy malicious payloads, including a cryptocurrency miner, on Linux hosts. The package, named sympy-dev, mimics SymPy, replicating the latter's project description verbatim in an attempt to deceive unsuspecting users into thinking that they are
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
The threat involves a malicious Python package named sympy-dev uploaded to the Python Package Index (PyPI) that impersonates the widely used SymPy library, a symbolic mathematics package. The attacker replicated the legitimate project's description verbatim to deceive users into installing what appears to be a development version of SymPy. Once installed on Linux hosts, the package modifies certain polynomial functions to act as a downloader for a cryptocurrency miner payload. When these functions are invoked, they retrieve a remote JSON configuration and download an ELF binary payload from a threat actor-controlled IP address (63.250.56[.]54). The payload is executed directly in memory using Linux's memfd_create and /proc/self/fd mechanisms, which prevents leaving forensic artifacts on disk and complicates detection. The downloaded binaries run the XMRig miner configured to mine Monero cryptocurrency using CPU resources exclusively, connecting to Stratum over TLS endpoints on port 3333 controlled by the attacker. This cryptojacking campaign leverages a supply chain attack vector, exploiting the trust developers place in PyPI packages. The implant also functions as a general-purpose loader capable of fetching and executing arbitrary code under the Python process's privileges, increasing the potential attack surface beyond mining. The package has been downloaded over 1,100 times since its publication on January 17, 2026, indicating a non-trivial exposure. The attack is stealthy, activating only when specific functions are called, which helps evade casual detection. The technique of in-memory execution and use of legitimate package impersonation reflects advanced tactics seen in prior campaigns like FritzFrog and Mimo. The package remains available on PyPI, posing ongoing risk to Python developers and organizations using Linux systems.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, this threat poses several risks. First, cryptojacking consumes CPU resources, degrading system performance and increasing operational costs, especially in large-scale Linux server environments common in European enterprises. Second, the malicious package undermines software supply chain integrity, potentially compromising development workflows and production systems if the package is used in automated pipelines or container builds. Third, the implant's capability to execute arbitrary code under Python process privileges could lead to further compromise, data exfiltration, or lateral movement within networks. Organizations relying heavily on Python for scientific computing, data analysis, or web services on Linux are particularly vulnerable. The stealthy nature of the attack, including in-memory execution and conditional triggering, complicates detection and remediation efforts. This could delay incident response and increase the window of exposure. Additionally, the persistence of the package on PyPI means new victims may continue to be infected. The reputational damage and potential regulatory implications under GDPR for failing to secure software supply chains and prevent unauthorized resource use are also concerns for European entities.
Mitigation Recommendations
European organizations should implement strict controls on third-party Python package usage. This includes enforcing the use of trusted package sources and verifying package authenticity through cryptographic signatures or hash checks before installation. Employing tools like PyPI package reputation scanners and dependency vulnerability analyzers can help detect suspicious packages. Monitoring network traffic for unusual connections to known malicious IPs or Stratum mining pools (e.g., port 3333 over TLS) can identify active cryptomining. Endpoint detection solutions should be configured to detect in-memory execution techniques and anomalous Python process behaviors. Integrating runtime application self-protection (RASP) or behavior-based anomaly detection can help identify conditional malicious code execution. Organizations should also educate developers about the risks of installing unverified packages and encourage the use of virtual environments with strict dependency controls. Regular audits of installed packages and automated alerts for new or unexpected dependencies are recommended. Finally, reporting and collaborating with PyPI maintainers to remove malicious packages promptly is critical to reducing exposure.
Affected Countries
Technical Details
- Article Source
- {"url":"https://thehackernews.com/2026/01/malicious-pypi-package-impersonates.html","fetched":true,"fetchedAt":"2026-01-22T21:44:40.752Z","wordCount":937}
Threat ID: 69729a4b4623b1157c91819e
Added to database: 1/22/2026, 9:44:43 PM
Last enriched: 1/22/2026, 9:46:37 PM
Last updated: 1/28/2026, 3:41:03 AM
Views: 87
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
CVE-2026-24852: CWE-122: Heap-based Buffer Overflow in InternationalColorConsortium iccDEV
MediumCVE-2026-24850: CWE-347: Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature in RustCrypto signatures
MediumCVE-2026-24784: CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') in dnnsoftware Dnn.Platform
MediumCVE-2026-24134: CWE-639: Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key in withstudiocms studiocms
MediumCVE-2024-1545: CWE-1256: Improper Restriction of Software Interfaces to Hardware Features in WolfSSL wolfCrypt
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
External Links
Need more coverage?
Upgrade to Pro Console in Console -> Billing for AI refresh and higher limits.
For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.