Red Hat Security Advisory: webkit2gtk3 security update

1. Requirements · Language Selection

   Use a language that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.

2. Implementation

   Check the results of all functions that return a value and verify that the value is expected.

3. Implementation

   If using exception handling, catch and throw specific exceptions instead of overly-general exceptions (CWE-396, CWE-397). Catch and handle exceptions as locally as possible so that exceptions do not propagate too far up the call stack (CWE-705). Avoid unchecked or uncaught exceptions where feasible (CWE-248).

OWASP Cheat Sheets

• Logging (opens in a new tab)
• Error Handling (opens in a new tab)

OWASP ASVS 4.0.3

• V11.1.7 (opens in a new tab)

From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

1. Architecture and Design · Language Selection

   Choose a language that provides automatic memory management.

2. Implementation · Attack Surface Reduction

   When freeing pointers, be sure to set them to NULL once they are freed. However, the utilization of multiple or complex data structures may lower the usefulness of this strategy.

OWASP Cheat Sheets

• XML Security (opens in a new tab)
• Mass Assignment (opens in a new tab)

OWASP ASVS 4.0.3

• V13.3.1 (opens in a new tab)
• V5.1.4 (opens in a new tab)
• V5.1.3 (opens in a new tab)

From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

1. Implementation · Input Validation

   Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.

2. Architecture and Design · Language Selection

   Use a language that provides appropriate memory abstractions.

OWASP Cheat Sheets

• XML Security (opens in a new tab)
• Mass Assignment (opens in a new tab)

OWASP ASVS 4.0.3

• V13.3.1 (opens in a new tab)
• V5.1.4 (opens in a new tab)
• V5.1.3 (opens in a new tab)

Attack patterns

• Overread Buffers (opens in a new tab)

From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

1. Architecture and Design · Operation

   Very carefully manage the setting, management, and handling of privileges. Explicitly manage trust zones in the software.

2. Architecture and Design · Separation of Privilege

   Compartmentalize the system to have "safe" areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow sensitive data to go outside of the trust boundary and always be careful when interfacing with a compartment outside of the safe area.

OWASP Cheat Sheets

• Docker Security (opens in a new tab)
• Third Party Javascript Management (opens in a new tab)
• Virtual Patching (opens in a new tab)
• Authorization (opens in a new tab)

OWASP ASVS 4.0.3

• V1.4.4 (opens in a new tab)
• V1.4.5 (opens in a new tab)
• V1.10.1 (opens in a new tab)

Attack patterns

• Embedding Scripts within Scripts (opens in a new tab)
• Modification of Windows Service Configuration (opens in a new tab)
• Malicious Root Certificate (opens in a new tab)
• Intent Spoof (opens in a new tab)
• WebView Exposure (opens in a new tab)

From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

1. Requirements · Language Selection

   Use a language that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.

2. Architecture and Design · Libraries or Frameworks

   Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.

3. Operation · Build and Compilation · Environment Hardening

   Use automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are offered by certain compilers or compiler extensions. Examples include: the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag, Fedora/Red Hat FORTIFY_SOURCE GCC flag, StackGuard, and ProPolice, which provide various mechanisms including canary-based detection and range/index…

OWASP Cheat Sheets

• XML Security (opens in a new tab)
• Mass Assignment (opens in a new tab)

OWASP ASVS 4.0.3

• V13.3.1 (opens in a new tab)
• V5.1.4 (opens in a new tab)
• V5.1.3 (opens in a new tab)

Attack patterns

• Buffer Overflow via Environment Variables (opens in a new tab)
• Overflow Buffers (opens in a new tab)
• Client-side Injection-induced Buffer Overflow (opens in a new tab)
• Filter Failure through Buffer Overflow (opens in a new tab)
• MIME Conversion (opens in a new tab)

From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

1. Requirements · Language Selection

   Use a language that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.

2. Architecture and Design · Libraries or Frameworks

   Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.

3. Operation · Build and Compilation · Environment Hardening

   Use automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are offered by certain compilers or compiler extensions. Examples include: the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag, Fedora/Red Hat FORTIFY_SOURCE GCC flag, StackGuard, and ProPolice, which provide various mechanisms including canary-based detection and range/index…

OWASP Cheat Sheets

• XML Security (opens in a new tab)
• Mass Assignment (opens in a new tab)

OWASP ASVS 4.0.3

• V13.3.1 (opens in a new tab)
• V5.1.4 (opens in a new tab)
• V5.1.3 (opens in a new tab)

From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

1. Implementation

   When using a critical resource such as a configuration file, check to see if the resource has insecure permissions (such as being modifiable by any regular user), and generate an error or even exit the software if there is a possibility that the resource could have been modified by an unauthorized party.

2. Architecture and Design

   Divide the software into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully defining distinct user groups, privileges, and/or roles. Map these against data, functionality, and the related resources. Then set the permissions accordingly.

3. Architecture and Design · Operation · Sandbox or Jail

   Run the code in a "jail" or similar sandbox environment that enforces strict boundaries between the process and the operating system. This may effectively restrict which files can be accessed in a particular directory or which commands can be executed by the software.

OWASP Cheat Sheets

• REST Assessment (opens in a new tab)
• Authorization (opens in a new tab)

OWASP ASVS 4.0.3

• V4.3.3 (opens in a new tab)
• V8.3.8 (opens in a new tab)
• V13.4.2 (opens in a new tab)

Attack patterns

• Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (opens in a new tab)
• Directory Indexing (opens in a new tab)
• Using Malicious Files (opens in a new tab)
• Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels (opens in a new tab)
• Signing Malicious Code (opens in a new tab)

From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

1. Architecture and Design · Attack Surface Reduction

   Consider using language-theoretic security (LangSec) techniques that characterize inputs using a formal language and build "recognizers" for that language. This effectively requires parsing to be a distinct layer that effectively enforces a boundary between raw input and internal data representations, instead of…

2. Architecture and Design · Libraries or Frameworks

   Use an input validation framework such as Struts or the OWASP ESAPI Validation API. Note that using a framework does not automatically address all input validation problems; be mindful of weaknesses that could arise from misusing the framework itself (CWE-1173).

3. Architecture and Design · Implementation · Attack Surface Reduction

   Understand all the potential areas where untrusted inputs can enter the product, including but not limited to: parameters or arguments, cookies, anything read from the network, environment variables, reverse DNS lookups, query results, request headers, URL components, e-mail, files, filenames, databases, and any…

OWASP Cheat Sheets

• XML Security (opens in a new tab)
• Mass Assignment (opens in a new tab)
• Injection Prevention (opens in a new tab)
• SQL Injection Prevention (opens in a new tab)
• Injection Prevention in Java (opens in a new tab)

OWASP ASVS 4.0.3

• V13.3.1 (opens in a new tab)
• V5.1.4 (opens in a new tab)
• V5.1.3 (opens in a new tab)

Attack patterns

• Buffer Overflow via Environment Variables (opens in a new tab)
• Server Side Include (SSI) Injection (opens in a new tab)
• Cross Zone Scripting (opens in a new tab)
• Command Line Execution through SQL Injection (opens in a new tab)
• Object Relational Mapping Injection (opens in a new tab)

From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

1. Implementation · Input Validation

   Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.

2. Architecture and Design

   For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks…

3. Implementation · Input Validation

   Inputs should be decoded and canonicalized to the application's current internal representation before being validated (CWE-180). Make sure that the application does not decode the same input twice (CWE-174).

OWASP Cheat Sheets

• Authorization (opens in a new tab)

OWASP ASVS 4.0.3

• V12.3.1 (opens in a new tab)

Attack patterns

• Path Traversal (opens in a new tab)
• Using Slashes and URL Encoding Combined to Bypass Validation Logic (opens in a new tab)
• Manipulating Web Input to File System Calls (opens in a new tab)
• Using Escaped Slashes in Alternate Encoding (opens in a new tab)
• Using Slashes in Alternate Encoding (opens in a new tab)

From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).