Skip to main content
CVE-2026-119377VulnerabilityPublished

SQLite before 3.54.0 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability in lookupName() that invokes the authorizer only for the first joined table's USING column

Source GCVE Database

0
Compare
Authoritative record:CVE-2026-119377· Low 2.0

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 2.0 Low : upgrade to 3.54.0 when convenient.

Data as of 30 Oct 2026, 13:35 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score
2.0Low
How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

Thin evidence

One scorer or none
CVSS scores by source
CNA (VulnCheck)CVSS 4.02.0
CNA (VulnCheck)CVSS 3.12.5
Patch
Available – fixed in 3.54.0
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Exploitation evidence

  1. Disclosed: evidence found.

    CVE published 30 Oct 2026

  2. Detectable: no evidence on record.

    No public nuclei template indexed

  3. Weaponized: no evidence on record.

    No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB

  4. Exploited in the wild: no evidence on record.

    Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation

  5. Observed by OffSeq Mirage: no evidence on record.

    No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 30 Oct 2026.

What to do

Upgrade SQLite to 3.54.0.

Affected software

ProductAffectedFixed in
SQLiteSQLiteAffected
  • <3.54.0
Fixed in
  • 3.54.0
GitHubSQLitepkg:github/SQLiteOther threatsAffected
  • <3.54.0
Fixed in
  • 3.54.0

Check your own hosts for these packages with threat-finder (opens in a new tab), our free open-source scanner.

Description

SQLite before 3.54.0 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability in lookupName() that invokes the authorizer only for the first joined table's USING column. Attackers able to submit SQL can query a shared USING column in a RIGHT or FULL JOIN to read columns denied via sqlite3_set_authorizer() SQLITE_READ restrictions.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…