Skip to main content
CVE-2024-34517VulnerabilityPublished Updated

CVE-2024-34517: Neo4j · Cypher Component

Affects neo4jSource GCVE Database

0

Not known to be exploited : upgrade to 5.20.0 when convenient.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 06:26 UTC

Severity
Medium

Rated by Threat Radar · No CVSS score from NVD or the CNA

EPSS
0.6% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 49% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
Patch
Available – fixed in 5.20.0

Exploitation evidence

  1. Disclosed: evidence found.

    CVE published 12 Mar 2025

  2. Detectable: no evidence on record.

    No public nuclei template indexed

  3. Weaponised: no evidence on record.

    No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB

  4. Exploited in the wild: no evidence on record.

    Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation

  5. Observed by OffSeq Mirage: no evidence on record.

    No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-26.

What to do

Upgrade neo4j to 5.20.0.

Affected software

ProductAffectedFixed in
Bitnamineo4jpkg:bitnami/neo4jOther threatsAffected
  • >=5.0.0 <5.20.0
Fixed in
  • 5.20.0

Check your own hosts for these packages with threat-finder (opens in a new tab), our free open-source scanner.

AI-suggested

A patch is available to remediate this vulnerability. Users should upgrade Neo4j to version 5.20.0 or later where the issue is fixed. Since this is not a cloud service, administrators must apply the update manually. No additional mitigation steps are indicated by the vendor advisory.

Description

Neo4j versions 5.0.0 through 5.18 contain a vulnerability in the Cypher component where IMMUTABLE privileges are mishandled in certain situations involving attackers with existing admin access. This flaw affects privilege handling but requires the attacker to already have administrative rights. A patch is available to address this issue.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…