"user=admin". Sometimes you don't even need to log in., (Tue, Sep 30th)
One of the common infosec jokes is that sometimes, you do not need to "break" an application, but you have to log in. This is often the case for weak default passwords, which are common in IoT devices. However, an even easier method is to tell the application who you are. This does not even require a password&#;x26;#;x21; One of the sad recurring vulnerabilities is an HTTP cookie that contains the user&#;x26;#;39;s username or userid.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
The analyzed threat centers on a common but critical security flaw where HTTP cookies directly store user identifiers such as usernames or user IDs without proper validation or protection. Attackers exploit this by simply setting cookie values (e.g., 'user=admin', 'uid=1') to impersonate privileged users, bypassing authentication entirely. This vulnerability is prevalent in various IoT devices and network management systems, including TBK DVRs (CVE-2024-3w721), LB-LINK wireless routers (CVE-2023-26801), Tenda O3V2 wireless access points, Qi'anxin VPN, Comai RAS System, and COMMAX biometric access control systems. The exploitation often involves sending crafted HTTP requests with malicious payloads embedded in parameters, leading to OS command injection and remote code execution. For example, attackers use POST requests to endpoints like '/goform/set_LimitClient_cfg' or '/goform/setPingInfo' to execute shell commands. The vulnerabilities stem from insecure cookie handling, lack of input sanitization, and outdated or unpatched firmware/software. These weaknesses allow attackers to gain unauthorized administrative access, modify configurations, extract sensitive data, or disrupt device functionality. The threat is notable for its simplicity—no password cracking or complex exploitation is needed, just manipulation of cookie values. While some vulnerabilities have CVEs, others remain unpatched and poorly documented, increasing risk. The threat is confirmed by honeypot data and public reports, indicating active exploitation attempts. The affected devices are often deployed in enterprise, telecom, and critical infrastructure environments, amplifying the potential impact.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of this threat is significant due to the widespread use of IoT devices and network management systems vulnerable to cookie-based authentication bypass and OS command injection. Successful exploitation can lead to unauthorized administrative access, enabling attackers to alter device configurations, intercept or manipulate network traffic, and execute arbitrary commands, potentially compromising entire networks. Critical infrastructure operators, telecom providers, and enterprises relying on these devices face risks of service disruption, data breaches, and loss of operational integrity. The threat also facilitates lateral movement within networks, increasing the scope of compromise. Given the integration of these devices in sensitive environments, exploitation could affect data confidentiality, system integrity, and availability, leading to regulatory compliance issues under GDPR and other frameworks. Additionally, the ease of exploitation without authentication or user interaction lowers the barrier for attackers, increasing the likelihood of successful attacks. The presence of unpatched or unsupported devices exacerbates the risk. Overall, the threat poses a high operational and security risk to European organizations, particularly those with extensive IoT deployments or critical network infrastructure.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Immediately audit all IoT devices, network appliances, and management systems for insecure cookie handling practices, specifically cookies containing usernames or user IDs without encryption or validation. 2. Implement strict input validation and sanitization on all server-side components processing cookie data to prevent injection attacks. 3. Apply all available firmware and software patches addressing these vulnerabilities; where patches are unavailable, consider device replacement or isolation. 4. Segment IoT and vulnerable devices on separate network zones with limited access to critical infrastructure to contain potential compromises. 5. Deploy Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) or Intrusion Prevention Systems (IPS) configured to detect and block suspicious HTTP requests with malicious payloads or anomalous cookie values. 6. Monitor network traffic and device logs for unusual cookie usage patterns or unauthorized administrative access attempts. 7. Enforce strong authentication mechanisms beyond cookie-based identification, such as multi-factor authentication and session management best practices. 8. Educate IT and security teams about this class of vulnerabilities to improve detection and response capabilities. 9. Engage with device vendors to encourage secure development practices and timely vulnerability disclosures. 10. Regularly review and update security policies to include cookie security and IoT device management.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Italy, Netherlands, Spain, Poland
"user=admin". Sometimes you don't even need to log in., (Tue, Sep 30th)
Description
One of the common infosec jokes is that sometimes, you do not need to "break" an application, but you have to log in. This is often the case for weak default passwords, which are common in IoT devices. However, an even easier method is to tell the application who you are. This does not even require a password&#;x26;#;x21; One of the sad recurring vulnerabilities is an HTTP cookie that contains the user&#;x26;#;39;s username or userid.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
The analyzed threat centers on a common but critical security flaw where HTTP cookies directly store user identifiers such as usernames or user IDs without proper validation or protection. Attackers exploit this by simply setting cookie values (e.g., 'user=admin', 'uid=1') to impersonate privileged users, bypassing authentication entirely. This vulnerability is prevalent in various IoT devices and network management systems, including TBK DVRs (CVE-2024-3w721), LB-LINK wireless routers (CVE-2023-26801), Tenda O3V2 wireless access points, Qi'anxin VPN, Comai RAS System, and COMMAX biometric access control systems. The exploitation often involves sending crafted HTTP requests with malicious payloads embedded in parameters, leading to OS command injection and remote code execution. For example, attackers use POST requests to endpoints like '/goform/set_LimitClient_cfg' or '/goform/setPingInfo' to execute shell commands. The vulnerabilities stem from insecure cookie handling, lack of input sanitization, and outdated or unpatched firmware/software. These weaknesses allow attackers to gain unauthorized administrative access, modify configurations, extract sensitive data, or disrupt device functionality. The threat is notable for its simplicity—no password cracking or complex exploitation is needed, just manipulation of cookie values. While some vulnerabilities have CVEs, others remain unpatched and poorly documented, increasing risk. The threat is confirmed by honeypot data and public reports, indicating active exploitation attempts. The affected devices are often deployed in enterprise, telecom, and critical infrastructure environments, amplifying the potential impact.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of this threat is significant due to the widespread use of IoT devices and network management systems vulnerable to cookie-based authentication bypass and OS command injection. Successful exploitation can lead to unauthorized administrative access, enabling attackers to alter device configurations, intercept or manipulate network traffic, and execute arbitrary commands, potentially compromising entire networks. Critical infrastructure operators, telecom providers, and enterprises relying on these devices face risks of service disruption, data breaches, and loss of operational integrity. The threat also facilitates lateral movement within networks, increasing the scope of compromise. Given the integration of these devices in sensitive environments, exploitation could affect data confidentiality, system integrity, and availability, leading to regulatory compliance issues under GDPR and other frameworks. Additionally, the ease of exploitation without authentication or user interaction lowers the barrier for attackers, increasing the likelihood of successful attacks. The presence of unpatched or unsupported devices exacerbates the risk. Overall, the threat poses a high operational and security risk to European organizations, particularly those with extensive IoT deployments or critical network infrastructure.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Immediately audit all IoT devices, network appliances, and management systems for insecure cookie handling practices, specifically cookies containing usernames or user IDs without encryption or validation. 2. Implement strict input validation and sanitization on all server-side components processing cookie data to prevent injection attacks. 3. Apply all available firmware and software patches addressing these vulnerabilities; where patches are unavailable, consider device replacement or isolation. 4. Segment IoT and vulnerable devices on separate network zones with limited access to critical infrastructure to contain potential compromises. 5. Deploy Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) or Intrusion Prevention Systems (IPS) configured to detect and block suspicious HTTP requests with malicious payloads or anomalous cookie values. 6. Monitor network traffic and device logs for unusual cookie usage patterns or unauthorized administrative access attempts. 7. Enforce strong authentication mechanisms beyond cookie-based identification, such as multi-factor authentication and session management best practices. 8. Educate IT and security teams about this class of vulnerabilities to improve detection and response capabilities. 9. Engage with device vendors to encourage secure development practices and timely vulnerability disclosures. 10. Regularly review and update security policies to include cookie security and IoT device management.
Affected Countries
For access to advanced analysis and higher rate limits, contact root@offseq.com
Technical Details
- Article Source
- {"url":"https://isc.sans.edu/diary/rss/32334","fetched":true,"fetchedAt":"2025-10-07T01:35:15.322Z","wordCount":553}
Threat ID: 68e46e546a45552f36e9697a
Added to database: 10/7/2025, 1:35:16 AM
Last enriched: 10/7/2025, 1:36:32 AM
Last updated: 11/20/2025, 6:22:44 PM
Views: 47
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
CVE-2024-1062: Heap-based Buffer Overflow
MediumCVE-2024-10973: Cleartext Transmission of Sensitive Information
MediumCVE-2024-10573: Out-of-bounds Write
MediumCVE-2024-10041: Insecure Storage of Sensitive Information
MediumCVE-2024-10033: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
External Links
Need enhanced features?
Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.