VulnerabilityPublished 13 Aug 2026Updated 4 Oct 2026

CVE-2026-50574: yt-dlp · Arbitrary code execution via manifest downloads with aria2c

Affects moodle-dlSource GCVE Database

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 8.3 High : upgrade to 2.3.13_11 soon.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 10:12 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

8.3High

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.4% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 39% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
Patch: Available – fixed in 2.3.13_11

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: High
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: Required
Scope: Changed
Confidentiality: High
Integrity: High
Availability: High

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: High: A successful attack depends on conditions beyond the attacker's control. That is, a successful attack cannot be accomplished at will, but requires the attacker to invest in some measurable amount of effort in preparation or execution against the vulnerable component before a successful attack can be expected. For example, a successful attack may require an attacker to: gather knowledge about the environment in which the vulnerable target/component exists; prepare the target environment to improve exploit reliability; or inject themselves into the logical network path between the target and the resource requested by the victim in order to read and/or modify network communications (e.g., a man in the middle attack).
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: Required: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires a user to take some action before the vulnerability can be exploited.
Scope: Changed: An exploited vulnerability can affect resources beyond the security scope managed by the security authority of the vulnerable component. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are different and managed by different security authorities.
Confidentiality: High: There is total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all resources within the impacted component being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact.
Integrity: High: There is a total loss of integrity, or a complete loss of protection. For example, the attacker is able to modify any/all files protected by the impacted component. Alternatively, only some files can be modified, but malicious modification would present a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component.
Availability: High: There is total loss of availability, resulting in the attacker being able to fully deny access to resources in the impacted component; this loss is either sustained (while the attacker continues to deliver the attack) or persistent (the condition persists even after the attack has completed). Alternatively, the attacker has the ability to deny some availability, but the loss of availability presents a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component (e.g., the attacker cannot disrupt existing connections, but can prevent new connections; the attacker can repeatedly exploit a vulnerability that, in each instance of a successful attack, leaks a only small amount of memory, but after repeated exploitation causes a service to become completely unavailable).

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 13 Aug 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Upgrade moodle-dl to 2.3.13_11.

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
Homebrewmoodle-dl`pkg:brew/moodle-dl`Other threats	Affected >=2.3.13 <2.3.13_11	Fixed in 2.3.13_11

Check your own hosts for these packages with threat-finder (opens in a new tab), our free open-source scanner.

Description

### Summary If aria2c is used as an external downloader for a fragmented manifest format (such as an HLS/DASH stream), yt-dlp passes insufficiently sanitized input to aria2c that allows an attacker to perform an arbitrary file write. On Windows platforms, this can lead to immediate arbitrary code execution. On non-Windows platforms, this can lead to arbitrary code execution upon the next invocation of yt-dlp. ### Details When downloading a fragmented manifest format such as an HLS or DASH stream, yt-dlp first extracts a list of all fragment URLs from the stream's manifest. If the user has selected aria2c as an external downloader, yt-dlp then constructs an input file for aria2c from the fragment URL list and passes its filepath as the argument to aria2c's `-i` option. aria2c's `-i` (or `--input-file`) option allows for downloading a list of URIs from the given text file. The text file must be formatted as a list of URIs separated by newlines. aria2c's format permits configuration lines for each URI, which can contain command-line options to be given to aria2c. These optional lines follow each URI line and are signified only by leading whitespace. yt-dlp constructs the input file with these optional lines so that it's able to specify the output filename for each fragment using the `out=` option. yt-dlp's utilization of the aria2c input file format presents two known attack vectors: 1. An attacker can craft a malicious DASH manifest with one or more fragment URLs that contain `
`, which is the HTML escape sequence for a newline. yt-dlp interprets this escape sequence as an actual newline character when writing the fragment URLs to the aria2c input file, which allows for an attacker to inject arbitrary aria2c options into the input file. With option injection, the attacker can achieve arbitrary file writes. This attack vector is possible only via downloads of DASH formats, since their manifests are an XML format which necessitates unescaping of HTML special characters. 2. An attacker can craft a malicious metadata response where the data parsed by yt-dlp as the `title` field (or any other metadata field that the user includes in their output template) contains strategically placed newlines and magnet URIs. If the user has passed the `--no-windows-filename` option to disable sanitization of newlines in output filenames, the attacker is able to achieve arbitrary file writes by injecting arbitrary URIs and options into the aria2c input file. This attack vector is possible via downloads of both HLS and DASH formats. On Windows, attacker-controlled file writes can lead to immediate arbitrary code execution: the attacker could write a malicious executable file named `ffmpeg.exe` to the current working directory, and it could be invoked during the postprocessing stage if the user's `yt-dlp.exe` also resides in the current working directory. On all platforms, attacker-controlled file writes can lead to arbitrary code execution on repeat invocations of yt-dlp: the attacker could write a yt-dlp configuration file (`yt-dlp.conf`) to the current working directory containing a malicious `--exec` argument. ### Patches yt-dlp version 2026.06.09 fixes this issue by removing support for downloading fragmented manifest formats with aria2c. ### Workarounds It is recommended to upgrade yt-dlp to version 2026.06.09 as soon as possible. For users who are not able to upgrade: - Add `--downloader dash,m3u8:native` to your yt-dlp command.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…