Threat Intelligence Database
Comprehensive database of the latest cyber threats affecting organizations worldwide. Filter and search to find specific threat intelligence relevant to your organization.
Stop chasing alerts. Route them.
Start free, then upgrade once to turn Radar into an automated delivery engine for your security stack.
Custom feeds / Automations: email, Slack, webhooks, SIEM/MISP / API access (baseline limits)
API access activates after upgrading in Console -> Billing.
Check if your credentials are on the dark web
Instant breach scanning across billions of leaked records. Free tier available.
Filter Threats
Narrow down the results by type, severity, or affected countries
Threat Intelligence
Click on any threat for detailed analysis and mitigation recommendations
An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.17 and 6.0 before 6.0.8. GeoDjango's `django.contrib.gis.geos.GEOSGeometry` is subject to a potential denial-of-service when parsing deeply nested `GEOMETRYCOLLECTION` objects supplied as well-known text (WKT), well-known binary (WKB), or hex-encoded WKB, which triggers unbounded recursion and a segmentation fault in the underlying GEOS library. Spatial field lookups and the `django.contrib.gis.forms.GeometryField` form field are also affected. Earlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.1.x, 5.0.x, and 4.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected. Django would like to thank Andrew MacPherson and kimchunbok_ for reporting this issue. Join the discussion | CVE Database V5 | 08/19/2026, 08:39:53 UTC Added: 08/04/2026, 16:28:46 UTC |
0 An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.17 and 6.0 before 6.0.8. `django.utils.translation.check_for_language()` is subject to a potential denial-of-service attack when given many distinct, very long language codes, which are retained as keys in an in-memory cache and consume process memory. Such codes reach the function through the `django.views.i18n.set_language()` view, which is not routed by default. The consumed memory is bounded, since request data is limited by the `DATA_UPLOAD_MAX_MEMORY_SIZE` setting (default 2.5 MB) and the cache holds a fixed maximum number of entries. Earlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.1.x, 5.0.x, and 4.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected. Django would like to thank Jaeyoung Jang for reporting this issue. Join the discussion | CVE Database V5 | 08/19/2026, 08:39:52 UTC Added: 08/04/2026, 16:28:46 UTC |
0 An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.17 and 6.0 before 6.0.8. GeoDjango spatial lookups optimistically parse the right-hand-side value as a raster by passing it to the `django.contrib.gis.gdal.GDALRaster` constructor. Any value used in a spatial lookup against a `GeometryField` or `RasterField` reaches this constructor, including untrusted input, for example a spatial-field filter submitted through the Django admin changelist query string by a staff user with view permission. A `dict`, or a `str` holding its JSON representation, is opened in write mode regardless of the constructor's `write=False` default, allowing a file with an attacker-chosen name and contents to be written through a file-backed GDAL driver. Any other `str` is treated as a datasource, allowing an outbound network request through a GDAL virtual filesystem handler. Writing a file to a location later imported by the application can result in remote code execution. Earlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.1.x, 5.0.x, and 4.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected. Django would like to thank Bence Nagy, localhost-detect, and kimchunbok_ for reporting this issue. Join the discussion | CVE Database V5 | 08/19/2026, 08:39:50 UTC Added: 08/04/2026, 16:28:46 UTC |
0 An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.17 and 6.0 before 6.0.8. `django.contrib.admin.utils.display_for_field()` renders `URLField` values as clickable links in the admin without validating the URL. A value stored with an unsafe scheme is displayed as a link on changelist and read-only admin pages, which allows cross-site scripting against staff users who click the link. Exploitation requires the unsafe value to already be stored in the database. `URLField` validation through a `ModelForm` or the admin rejects unsafe schemes, so this affects applications that persist `URLField` data without running model validation, for example through direct queryset writes, deserialization, or bulk import of untrusted input. Django would like to thank Egor Saltykov for reporting this issue. Join the discussion | CVE Database V5 | 08/18/2026, 10:04:42 UTC Added: 08/04/2026, 16:28:46 UTC |
0 An issue was discovered in Django 6.0 before 6.0.7 and 5.2 before 5.2.16. `DomainNameValidator` does not prohibit newlines in domain names (unless used via a form field, since `CharField` strips newlines). If an application uses values with newlines in an HTTP response, header injection can occur. Django itself is unaffected because `HttpResponse` prohibits newlines in HTTP headers. Earlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.0.x, 4.1.x, and 3.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected. Django would like to thank Bence Nagy for reporting this issue. Join the discussion | CVE Database V5 | 07/07/2026, 15:32:57 UTC Added: 07/07/2026, 14:59:12 UTC |
0 An issue was discovered in Django 6.0 before 6.0.7 and 5.2 before 5.2.16. `django.contrib.gis.gdal.GDALRaster` over-reads its in-memory buffer when constructed from a bytes object, which can disclose adjacent memory or cause service degradation via a potential segmentation fault when the `vsi_buffer` property is accessed. Earlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.0.x, 4.1.x, and 3.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected. Django would like to thank Bence Nagy for reporting this issue. Join the discussion | CVE Database V5 | 07/07/2026, 15:32:57 UTC Added: 07/07/2026, 14:59:12 UTC |
0 An issue was discovered in Django 6.0 before 6.0.7 and 5.2 before 5.2.16. `UpdateCacheMiddleware` and the `cache_page()` decorator cache responses that vary on cookies when the incoming request carries unrelated cookies, which allows remote attackers to read private data from the shared cache. Earlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.0.x, 4.1.x, and 3.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected. Django would like to thank Chris Whyland for reporting this issue. Join the discussion | CVE Database V5 | 07/07/2026, 15:32:57 UTC Added: 07/07/2026, 14:59:12 UTC |
Django versions 5.2 before 5.2.15 and 6.0 before 6.0.6 contain a vulnerability in the UpdateCacheMiddleware component where Cache-Control response directives are not matched case-insensitively. This flaw allows remote attackers to read cached responses that were incorrectly cached due to uppercase or mixed-case Cache-Control headers. Earlier unsupported Django versions may also be affected. The issue has a low severity rating and no official patch or remediation level is currently confirmed. Join the discussion | CVE Database V5 | 06/03/2026, 15:30:43 UTC Added: 06/03/2026, 14:18:47 UTC |
0 CVE-2026-6873 is a low-severity vulnerability in Django versions 6.0 and 5.2 where the get_signed_cookie function uses a non-injective salt derivation method. This flaw allows an attacker to reuse a signed cookie in a different context by exploiting distinct (name, salt) pairs that produce the same concatenation. The issue affects Django 6.0 before 6.0.6 and 5.2 before 5.2.15, with earlier unsupported versions possibly also affected. No official patch or remediation level has been confirmed yet. Join the discussion | CVE Database V5 | 06/03/2026, 15:30:43 UTC Added: 06/03/2026, 14:18:47 UTC |
0 An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.15 and 6.0 before 6.0.6. `django.utils.cache.has_vary_header()` in Django does not strip leading or trailing whitespace from `Vary` response header values before comparison, which allows remote attackers to read cached responses via requests to URLs whose responses contain whitespace-padded Vary header values. Earlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.0.x, 4.1.x, and 3.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected. Django would like to thank Navid Rezazadeh for reporting this issue. Join the discussion | CVE Database V5 | 06/03/2026, 15:30:43 UTC Added: 06/03/2026, 14:18:47 UTC |
Showing 1 to 10 of 47 results