Threats Tagged 'ghsa-322x-v876-g883'
View all threats tagged with 'ghsa-322x-v876-g883'. Filter and sort to focus on specific types of threats.
Stop chasing alerts. Route them.
Start free, then upgrade once to turn Radar into an automated delivery engine for your security stack.
Custom feeds / Automations: email, Slack, webhooks, SIEM/MISP / API access (baseline limits)
API access activates after upgrading in Console -> Billing.
Check if your credentials are on the dark web
Instant breach scanning across billions of leaked records. Free tier available.
Filter Threats
Narrow down the results by type, severity, or affected countries
Threats Tagged 'ghsa-322x-v876-g883'
Click on any threat for detailed analysis and mitigation recommendations
## Summary The `matchFileSnapshot` function in `src/assertions/snapshots.ts` accepted a `filePath` parameter with zero validation. When snapshot update mode was active (`UPDATE_SNAPSHOTS=1` or `setUpdateMode('all')`), an attacker who controls test input could write arbitrary content to any filesystem path the process has write access to, including creating intermediate directories. ## Affected Code **File:** `src/assertions/snapshots.ts`, lines 732-769 ```typescript export function matchFileSnapshot(actual: unknown, filePath: string): void { const serialized = serialize(actual); const mode = resolveUpdateMode(); const fileExists = fs.existsSync(filePath); if (!fileExists) { if (mode === 'all' || mode === 'new') { const dir = path.dirname(filePath); if (!fs.existsSync(dir)) { fs.mkdirSync(dir, { recursive: true }); } fs.writeFileSync(filePath, serialized, 'utf-8'); ``` The `filePath` flows from `expect(value).toMatchFileSnapshot(filePath)` at `index.ts:1033-1035` with no sanitization, no check that the path is within an expected directory, and no symlink resolution. ## Proof of Concept ```typescript import { expect, setUpdateMode } from '@asymmetric-effort/nogginlessdom'; setUpdateMode('all'); // Writes arbitrary content to any writable path expect('malicious content').toMatchFileSnapshot('/tmp/exploit/payload.txt'); // Path traversal via relative components expect('data').toMatchFileSnapshot('../../../tmp/evil.txt'); // In CI environments, could overwrite CI config expect('injected step').toMatchFileSnapshot('/home/runner/.github/workflows/backdoor.yml'); ``` ## Impact In CI/CD environments where test files may come from untrusted pull requests, this allows writing to any writable filesystem location with directory creation. An attacker could overwrite configuration files, inject code into build artifacts, or modify CI pipeline definitions. ## Fix Fixed in commit https://github.com/asymmetric-effort/NogginLessDom/commit/785e6ac6e124d1a89b3ccf40bbd75fc8e4cb215d on `main`. The `matchFileSnapshot` function now validates that the resolved file path is within the project root directory (defaults to `process.cwd()`, configurable via optional `projectRoot` parameter). Paths that resolve outside the project directory are rejected with a descriptive error. ```typescript export function matchFileSnapshot( actual: unknown, filePath: string, projectRoot?: string, ): void { const root = projectRoot ?? process.cwd(); const resolved = path.resolve(root, filePath); if (!resolved.startsWith(root + path.sep) && resolved !== root) { throw new Error( `File snapshot path must be within the project directory: ${filePath}`, ); } // ... all subsequent file I/O uses `resolved` instead of `filePath` } ``` Join the discussion | GCVE Database | 07/02/2026, 20:19:20 UTC Added: 07/02/2026, 22:56:51 UTC |
Showing 1 to 1 of 1 result