AutoIT3 Compiled Scripts Dropping Shellcodes, (Fri, Dec 5th)
AutoIT3[1] is a powerful language that helps to built nice applications for Windows environments, mainly to automate tasks. If it looks pretty old, the latest version was released last September and it remains popular amongst developers, for the good… or the bad! Malware written in AutoIt3 has existed since the late 2000s, when attackers realized that the language was easy to learn (close to basic) but can also compiled into standalone PE files! From a malware point of view, such executables make an extended use of packed data, making them more stealthy.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
AutoIT3 is a scripting language popular for automating Windows tasks and capable of compiling scripts into standalone PE executables. Attackers exploit AutoIT3's FileInstall() function, which embeds external files into compiled scripts, to drop obfuscated shellcode onto infected systems. When executed, the compiled script extracts the embedded payload (e.g., a file named 'inhumation' or 'buncal') into the %TEMP% directory. The shellcode is obfuscated using a simple ASCII decrement function and then read into memory. The script allocates executable memory via VirtualAlloc with appropriate permissions, copies the shellcode into this memory, and executes it using the CallWindowProc API from user32.dll, a known technique to evade detection. Samples analyzed include executables delivering Quasar RAT and Phantom stealer malware. The use of packed data and obfuscation enhances stealth. This attack vector has been observed in recent waves, indicating active use by threat actors. The malware does not require user interaction beyond execution and does not rely on known exploits but on script-based payload delivery and execution.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, this threat poses a risk primarily to Windows endpoints where AutoIT3 scripts or executables are used or can be executed. The stealthy nature of the payload delivery and execution can lead to undetected persistence, data exfiltration, and remote access via RATs like Quasar. The Phantom stealer component can compromise credentials and sensitive information, impacting confidentiality. The ability to execute arbitrary shellcode in memory without dropping traditional malware files increases the difficulty of detection and remediation. Sectors with high automation reliance or legacy script usage, such as manufacturing, finance, or government, may face increased exposure. The medium severity reflects the potential for significant impact if the malware is deployed successfully, especially in environments lacking robust endpoint detection and response capabilities.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Implement strict application whitelisting to prevent unauthorized execution of AutoIT3 compiled scripts, especially those delivered via email or downloaded from untrusted sources. 2. Monitor and alert on the use of the FileInstall() function within AutoIT scripts, particularly when scripts drop files into temporary directories. 3. Employ endpoint detection solutions capable of detecting in-memory shellcode execution and suspicious API calls such as VirtualAlloc and CallWindowProc. 4. Conduct regular audits of automation scripts and executables to identify and remove legacy or unauthorized AutoIT3 scripts. 5. Use sandboxing and detonation environments to analyze suspicious AutoIT executables before allowing them in production. 6. Educate users and administrators about the risks of executing unknown scripts and the signs of AutoIT-based malware. 7. Restrict write permissions to %TEMP% directories and monitor file creation activities in these locations. 8. Integrate threat intelligence feeds to detect known hashes and indicators related to these threats. 9. Harden email and web gateways to block ZIP archives containing executable files or scripts. 10. Maintain up-to-date antivirus and endpoint protection platforms with heuristic and behavioral detection capabilities.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Italy, Spain, Poland
AutoIT3 Compiled Scripts Dropping Shellcodes, (Fri, Dec 5th)
Description
AutoIT3[1] is a powerful language that helps to built nice applications for Windows environments, mainly to automate tasks. If it looks pretty old, the latest version was released last September and it remains popular amongst developers, for the good… or the bad! Malware written in AutoIt3 has existed since the late 2000s, when attackers realized that the language was easy to learn (close to basic) but can also compiled into standalone PE files! From a malware point of view, such executables make an extended use of packed data, making them more stealthy.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
AutoIT3 is a scripting language popular for automating Windows tasks and capable of compiling scripts into standalone PE executables. Attackers exploit AutoIT3's FileInstall() function, which embeds external files into compiled scripts, to drop obfuscated shellcode onto infected systems. When executed, the compiled script extracts the embedded payload (e.g., a file named 'inhumation' or 'buncal') into the %TEMP% directory. The shellcode is obfuscated using a simple ASCII decrement function and then read into memory. The script allocates executable memory via VirtualAlloc with appropriate permissions, copies the shellcode into this memory, and executes it using the CallWindowProc API from user32.dll, a known technique to evade detection. Samples analyzed include executables delivering Quasar RAT and Phantom stealer malware. The use of packed data and obfuscation enhances stealth. This attack vector has been observed in recent waves, indicating active use by threat actors. The malware does not require user interaction beyond execution and does not rely on known exploits but on script-based payload delivery and execution.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, this threat poses a risk primarily to Windows endpoints where AutoIT3 scripts or executables are used or can be executed. The stealthy nature of the payload delivery and execution can lead to undetected persistence, data exfiltration, and remote access via RATs like Quasar. The Phantom stealer component can compromise credentials and sensitive information, impacting confidentiality. The ability to execute arbitrary shellcode in memory without dropping traditional malware files increases the difficulty of detection and remediation. Sectors with high automation reliance or legacy script usage, such as manufacturing, finance, or government, may face increased exposure. The medium severity reflects the potential for significant impact if the malware is deployed successfully, especially in environments lacking robust endpoint detection and response capabilities.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Implement strict application whitelisting to prevent unauthorized execution of AutoIT3 compiled scripts, especially those delivered via email or downloaded from untrusted sources. 2. Monitor and alert on the use of the FileInstall() function within AutoIT scripts, particularly when scripts drop files into temporary directories. 3. Employ endpoint detection solutions capable of detecting in-memory shellcode execution and suspicious API calls such as VirtualAlloc and CallWindowProc. 4. Conduct regular audits of automation scripts and executables to identify and remove legacy or unauthorized AutoIT3 scripts. 5. Use sandboxing and detonation environments to analyze suspicious AutoIT executables before allowing them in production. 6. Educate users and administrators about the risks of executing unknown scripts and the signs of AutoIT-based malware. 7. Restrict write permissions to %TEMP% directories and monitor file creation activities in these locations. 8. Integrate threat intelligence feeds to detect known hashes and indicators related to these threats. 9. Harden email and web gateways to block ZIP archives containing executable files or scripts. 10. Maintain up-to-date antivirus and endpoint protection platforms with heuristic and behavioral detection capabilities.
Affected Countries
Technical Details
- Article Source
- {"url":"https://isc.sans.edu/diary/rss/32542","fetched":true,"fetchedAt":"2025-12-06T04:45:11.670Z","wordCount":784}
Threat ID: 6933b4eb2271496a0fa6c8b0
Added to database: 12/6/2025, 4:45:31 AM
Last enriched: 12/13/2025, 5:08:16 AM
Last updated: 1/20/2026, 6:24:18 PM
Views: 83
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
Inside a Multi-Stage Windows Malware Campaign
MediumOperation Nomad Leopard: Targeted Spear-Phishing Campaign Against Government Entities in Afghanistan
MediumFrom Extension to Infection: An In-Depth Analysis of the Evelyn Stealer Campaign Targeting Software Developers
MediumOperation Covert Access: Weaponized LNK-Based Spear-Phishing Targeting Argentina's Judicial Sector to Deploy a Covert RAT
MediumThreatFox IOCs for 2026-01-19
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
External Links
Need more coverage?
Upgrade to Pro Console in Console -> Billing for AI refresh and higher limits.
For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.