CVE-1999-0977: Buffer overflow in Solaris sadmind allows remote attackers to gain root privileges using a NETMGT_PR
Buffer overflow in Solaris sadmind allows remote attackers to gain root privileges using a NETMGT_PROC_SERVICE request.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-1999-0977 is a critical buffer overflow vulnerability found in the Solaris operating system's 'sadmind' daemon, which is responsible for remote system administration tasks. The vulnerability arises when the daemon processes a specially crafted NETMGT_PROC_SERVICE request, leading to a buffer overflow condition. This overflow allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code with root privileges without requiring any authentication or user interaction. The affected Solaris versions include 2.5, 2.5.1, 2.6, 7.0, 5.5, 5.5.1, and 5.7, covering a broad range of Solaris releases from the late 1990s. Exploitation is straightforward due to the network accessibility of sadmind and the lack of authentication, making it possible for attackers to gain full control over vulnerable systems remotely. The vulnerability impacts confidentiality, integrity, and availability, as attackers can execute arbitrary commands, modify system files, and potentially disrupt services. Despite its age, the vulnerability holds a CVSS score of 10.0, reflecting its critical nature. No official patches are available, and there are no known exploits in the wild documented, though the ease of exploitation and severity make it a significant risk if legacy systems remain in use.
Potential Impact
For European organizations still operating legacy Solaris systems within the affected versions, this vulnerability poses a severe risk. Successful exploitation grants attackers root-level access, enabling full system compromise, data theft, unauthorized modifications, and potential lateral movement within networks. Critical infrastructure, government agencies, financial institutions, and enterprises relying on Solaris for legacy applications could face operational disruptions, data breaches, and compliance violations. The lack of authentication and remote exploitability increases the attack surface, especially if these systems are exposed to untrusted networks or insufficiently segmented internal environments. Given the criticality of root access, attackers could deploy persistent backdoors, disrupt services, or exfiltrate sensitive information, severely impacting organizational security posture and business continuity.
Mitigation Recommendations
Given that no official patches are available, organizations must adopt compensating controls to mitigate risk. First, immediate network-level restrictions should be implemented to block or tightly control access to the sadmind service (typically port 327) using firewalls or network segmentation, limiting exposure to trusted administrative hosts only. Disabling the sadmind service entirely on systems where remote administration is not required is strongly recommended. For environments where Solaris legacy systems must remain operational, deploying host-based intrusion detection systems (HIDS) and continuous monitoring for anomalous network activity targeting sadmind can provide early warning of exploitation attempts. Additionally, applying strict access control policies, isolating vulnerable systems in dedicated network zones, and employing VPNs or secure jump hosts for remote administration can reduce risk. Organizations should also plan for migration off unsupported Solaris versions to modern, supported platforms to eliminate exposure to this and other legacy vulnerabilities.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Italy, Spain, Sweden, Finland
CVE-1999-0977: Buffer overflow in Solaris sadmind allows remote attackers to gain root privileges using a NETMGT_PR
Description
Buffer overflow in Solaris sadmind allows remote attackers to gain root privileges using a NETMGT_PROC_SERVICE request.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-1999-0977 is a critical buffer overflow vulnerability found in the Solaris operating system's 'sadmind' daemon, which is responsible for remote system administration tasks. The vulnerability arises when the daemon processes a specially crafted NETMGT_PROC_SERVICE request, leading to a buffer overflow condition. This overflow allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code with root privileges without requiring any authentication or user interaction. The affected Solaris versions include 2.5, 2.5.1, 2.6, 7.0, 5.5, 5.5.1, and 5.7, covering a broad range of Solaris releases from the late 1990s. Exploitation is straightforward due to the network accessibility of sadmind and the lack of authentication, making it possible for attackers to gain full control over vulnerable systems remotely. The vulnerability impacts confidentiality, integrity, and availability, as attackers can execute arbitrary commands, modify system files, and potentially disrupt services. Despite its age, the vulnerability holds a CVSS score of 10.0, reflecting its critical nature. No official patches are available, and there are no known exploits in the wild documented, though the ease of exploitation and severity make it a significant risk if legacy systems remain in use.
Potential Impact
For European organizations still operating legacy Solaris systems within the affected versions, this vulnerability poses a severe risk. Successful exploitation grants attackers root-level access, enabling full system compromise, data theft, unauthorized modifications, and potential lateral movement within networks. Critical infrastructure, government agencies, financial institutions, and enterprises relying on Solaris for legacy applications could face operational disruptions, data breaches, and compliance violations. The lack of authentication and remote exploitability increases the attack surface, especially if these systems are exposed to untrusted networks or insufficiently segmented internal environments. Given the criticality of root access, attackers could deploy persistent backdoors, disrupt services, or exfiltrate sensitive information, severely impacting organizational security posture and business continuity.
Mitigation Recommendations
Given that no official patches are available, organizations must adopt compensating controls to mitigate risk. First, immediate network-level restrictions should be implemented to block or tightly control access to the sadmind service (typically port 327) using firewalls or network segmentation, limiting exposure to trusted administrative hosts only. Disabling the sadmind service entirely on systems where remote administration is not required is strongly recommended. For environments where Solaris legacy systems must remain operational, deploying host-based intrusion detection systems (HIDS) and continuous monitoring for anomalous network activity targeting sadmind can provide early warning of exploitation attempts. Additionally, applying strict access control policies, isolating vulnerable systems in dedicated network zones, and employing VPNs or secure jump hosts for remote administration can reduce risk. Organizations should also plan for migration off unsupported Solaris versions to modern, supported platforms to eliminate exposure to this and other legacy vulnerabilities.
Affected Countries
For access to advanced analysis and higher rate limits, contact root@offseq.com
Threat ID: 682ca32cb6fd31d6ed7df4dc
Added to database: 5/20/2025, 3:43:40 PM
Last enriched: 6/25/2025, 6:44:23 PM
Last updated: 7/28/2025, 4:10:06 PM
Views: 8
Related Threats
CVE-2025-7973: CWE-268: Privilege Chaining in Rockwell Automation FactoryTalk® ViewPoint
HighCVE-2025-7773: CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization in Rockwell Automation 5032-CFGB16M12P5DR
HighCVE-2025-9036: CWE-200 Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor in Rockwell Automation FactoryTalk® Action Manager
HighCVE-2025-7774: CWE-306: Missing Authentication for Critical Function in Rockwell Automation 5032-CFGB16M12P5DR
HighCVE-2025-8715: Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences ('CRLF Injection') in PostgreSQL
HighActions
Updates to AI analysis are available only with a Pro account. Contact root@offseq.com for access.
External Links
Need enhanced features?
Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.