Skip to main content

CVE-2022-39237: CWE-347: Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature in sylabs sif

Medium
Published: Thu Oct 06 2022 (10/06/2022, 00:00:00 UTC)
Source: CVE
Vendor/Project: sylabs
Product: sif

Description

syslabs/sif is the Singularity Image Format (SIF) reference implementation. In versions prior to 2.8.1the `github.com/sylabs/sif/v2/pkg/integrity` package did not verify that the hash algorithm(s) used are cryptographically secure when verifying digital signatures. A patch is available in version >= v2.8.1 of the module. Users are encouraged to upgrade. Users unable to upgrade may independently validate that the hash algorithm(s) used for metadata digest(s) and signature hash are cryptographically secure.

AI-Powered Analysis

AILast updated: 06/22/2025, 16:21:30 UTC

Technical Analysis

CVE-2022-39237 is a medium-severity vulnerability affecting versions of the sylabs/sif (Singularity Image Format) reference implementation prior to 2.8.1. The vulnerability arises from improper verification of cryptographic signatures within the integrity package (github.com/sylabs/sif/v2/pkg/integrity). Specifically, the implementation failed to ensure that the hash algorithms used for verifying digital signatures were cryptographically secure. This means that weaker or deprecated hash functions could be accepted during signature verification, potentially allowing an attacker to craft malicious SIF images with forged signatures that would be accepted as valid. The Singularity Image Format is widely used in containerization and scientific computing environments to package and distribute container images securely. The integrity of these images is critical to ensure that the software and data they contain have not been tampered with. By not enforcing secure hash algorithms, the vulnerability undermines the trust model of image verification, potentially enabling attackers to inject malicious code or alter container contents without detection. The issue was addressed in version 2.8.1 of the module, where the verification process was updated to validate that only cryptographically secure hash algorithms are used for metadata digests and signature hashes. Users unable to upgrade are advised to manually verify the cryptographic strength of the hash algorithms used in their deployments. There are no known exploits in the wild at this time, but the vulnerability represents a significant risk in environments where image integrity is paramount.

Potential Impact

For European organizations, particularly those involved in scientific research, high-performance computing, and containerized application deployment, this vulnerability could have serious consequences. Compromised image integrity could lead to the execution of unauthorized or malicious code within containerized environments, potentially resulting in data breaches, intellectual property theft, or disruption of critical services. Given the increasing reliance on container technologies in sectors such as academia, healthcare, and manufacturing across Europe, exploitation could undermine operational security and trust in software supply chains. Additionally, organizations subject to strict data protection regulations like GDPR could face compliance risks if this vulnerability leads to unauthorized data access or manipulation. The impact is heightened in environments where automated deployment pipelines rely on SIF images, as malicious images could propagate rapidly across systems.

Mitigation Recommendations

To mitigate this vulnerability, European organizations should prioritize upgrading all deployments of sylabs/sif to version 2.8.1 or later, where the cryptographic verification process has been corrected. For environments where immediate upgrading is not feasible, organizations should implement manual checks to ensure that only secure hash algorithms (e.g., SHA-256 or stronger) are used for signature verification. This can be achieved by auditing the configuration and code paths related to signature verification within the integrity package. Additionally, organizations should enforce strict image signing policies and integrate additional layers of verification, such as using external signature validation tools or hardware security modules (HSMs) to validate image signatures. Monitoring and logging of image verification failures should be enhanced to detect potential exploitation attempts. Finally, organizations should review and harden their container deployment pipelines to prevent the introduction of untrusted images, including restricting image sources and implementing runtime security controls.

Need more detailed analysis?Get Pro

Technical Details

Data Version
5.1
Assigner Short Name
GitHub_M
Date Reserved
2022-09-02T00:00:00.000Z
Cisa Enriched
true

Threat ID: 682d9845c4522896dcbf4614

Added to database: 5/21/2025, 9:09:25 AM

Last enriched: 6/22/2025, 4:21:30 PM

Last updated: 8/16/2025, 3:40:30 AM

Views: 14

Actions

PRO

Updates to AI analysis are available only with a Pro account. Contact root@offseq.com for access.

Please log in to the Console to use AI analysis features.

Need enhanced features?

Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.

Latest Threats