CVE-2022-48827: Vulnerability in Linux Linux
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: NFSD: Fix the behavior of READ near OFFSET_MAX Dan Aloni reports: > Due to commit 8cfb9015280d ("NFS: Always provide aligned buffers to > the RPC read layers") on the client, a read of 0xfff is aligned up > to server rsize of 0x1000. > > As a result, in a test where the server has a file of size > 0x7fffffffffffffff, and the client tries to read from the offset > 0x7ffffffffffff000, the read causes loff_t overflow in the server > and it returns an NFS code of EINVAL to the client. The client as > a result indefinitely retries the request. The Linux NFS client does not handle NFS?ERR_INVAL, even though all NFS specifications permit servers to return that status code for a READ. Instead of NFS?ERR_INVAL, have out-of-range READ requests succeed and return a short result. Set the EOF flag in the result to prevent the client from retrying the READ request. This behavior appears to be consistent with Solaris NFS servers. Note that NFSv3 and NFSv4 use u64 offset values on the wire. These must be converted to loff_t internally before use -- an implicit type cast is not adequate for this purpose. Otherwise VFS checks against sb->s_maxbytes do not work properly.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2022-48827 is a vulnerability in the Linux kernel's Network File System daemon (NFSD) related to handling READ requests near the maximum file offset (OFFSET_MAX). The issue arises from a prior commit that aligned read buffer sizes on the client side, causing a read request near the maximum 64-bit file offset (0x7fffffffffffffff) to overflow the server's internal loff_t type, which is used to represent file offsets. Specifically, when a client attempts to read from an offset close to this maximum value, the server's offset calculation overflows, resulting in an invalid argument error (EINVAL) being returned to the client. However, the Linux NFS client does not properly handle the NFS error code ERR_INVAL, which is permitted by NFS specifications for READ operations. Instead of gracefully handling this error, the client indefinitely retries the request, potentially causing resource exhaustion or denial of service on the server or client side. The fix involves changing the server behavior to allow out-of-range READ requests to succeed by returning a short read result and setting the EOF flag, preventing the client from retrying. This approach aligns with behavior observed in Solaris NFS servers. The root cause is the improper conversion of 64-bit offset values (u64) from the NFS protocol into the internal loff_t type, which requires careful handling to avoid overflow and ensure correct validation against maximum file size limits. This vulnerability affects Linux kernel versions identified by the commit hash 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 and similar builds. No known exploits are currently reported in the wild, and no CVSS score has been assigned yet.
Potential Impact
For European organizations relying on Linux-based NFS servers or clients, this vulnerability could lead to denial of service conditions. Specifically, a malicious or misconfigured NFS client could send crafted READ requests near the maximum file offset, causing the server to return errors that the client mishandles by retrying indefinitely. This behavior can lead to resource exhaustion on both client and server, potentially degrading service availability. Critical infrastructure, cloud providers, and enterprises using NFS for file sharing and storage in Europe could experience disruptions. Additionally, since NFS is widely used in enterprise and data center environments, this vulnerability could be exploited to cause performance degradation or outages in shared storage environments. Although no direct data confidentiality or integrity compromise is indicated, the availability impact could be significant, especially in environments with high NFS traffic or where automated systems rely on stable NFS mounts. The lack of proper error handling also indicates a robustness issue in the Linux NFS client implementation, which could affect operational stability.
Mitigation Recommendations
European organizations should promptly update their Linux kernels to versions that include the patch for CVE-2022-48827. Since the vulnerability is related to the Linux kernel's NFS client and server code, applying official kernel updates from trusted Linux distributions is the most effective mitigation. In environments where immediate patching is not feasible, administrators should consider limiting NFS client access to trusted hosts and monitoring for unusual NFS READ request patterns near the maximum offset values. Network-level controls such as firewall rules or NFS protocol filtering could help mitigate exploitation attempts. Additionally, auditing and logging NFS errors and client retries can help detect potential exploitation attempts. Organizations should also review their NFS client implementations and configurations to ensure they handle server error codes correctly and do not retry indefinitely on ERR_INVAL responses. Engaging with Linux distribution vendors for backported patches and security advisories is recommended. Finally, testing NFS client and server behavior in controlled environments after patching is advised to confirm the fix and prevent regressions.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Sweden, Italy, Spain, Poland, Belgium, Finland
CVE-2022-48827: Vulnerability in Linux Linux
Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: NFSD: Fix the behavior of READ near OFFSET_MAX Dan Aloni reports: > Due to commit 8cfb9015280d ("NFS: Always provide aligned buffers to > the RPC read layers") on the client, a read of 0xfff is aligned up > to server rsize of 0x1000. > > As a result, in a test where the server has a file of size > 0x7fffffffffffffff, and the client tries to read from the offset > 0x7ffffffffffff000, the read causes loff_t overflow in the server > and it returns an NFS code of EINVAL to the client. The client as > a result indefinitely retries the request. The Linux NFS client does not handle NFS?ERR_INVAL, even though all NFS specifications permit servers to return that status code for a READ. Instead of NFS?ERR_INVAL, have out-of-range READ requests succeed and return a short result. Set the EOF flag in the result to prevent the client from retrying the READ request. This behavior appears to be consistent with Solaris NFS servers. Note that NFSv3 and NFSv4 use u64 offset values on the wire. These must be converted to loff_t internally before use -- an implicit type cast is not adequate for this purpose. Otherwise VFS checks against sb->s_maxbytes do not work properly.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-2022-48827 is a vulnerability in the Linux kernel's Network File System daemon (NFSD) related to handling READ requests near the maximum file offset (OFFSET_MAX). The issue arises from a prior commit that aligned read buffer sizes on the client side, causing a read request near the maximum 64-bit file offset (0x7fffffffffffffff) to overflow the server's internal loff_t type, which is used to represent file offsets. Specifically, when a client attempts to read from an offset close to this maximum value, the server's offset calculation overflows, resulting in an invalid argument error (EINVAL) being returned to the client. However, the Linux NFS client does not properly handle the NFS error code ERR_INVAL, which is permitted by NFS specifications for READ operations. Instead of gracefully handling this error, the client indefinitely retries the request, potentially causing resource exhaustion or denial of service on the server or client side. The fix involves changing the server behavior to allow out-of-range READ requests to succeed by returning a short read result and setting the EOF flag, preventing the client from retrying. This approach aligns with behavior observed in Solaris NFS servers. The root cause is the improper conversion of 64-bit offset values (u64) from the NFS protocol into the internal loff_t type, which requires careful handling to avoid overflow and ensure correct validation against maximum file size limits. This vulnerability affects Linux kernel versions identified by the commit hash 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 and similar builds. No known exploits are currently reported in the wild, and no CVSS score has been assigned yet.
Potential Impact
For European organizations relying on Linux-based NFS servers or clients, this vulnerability could lead to denial of service conditions. Specifically, a malicious or misconfigured NFS client could send crafted READ requests near the maximum file offset, causing the server to return errors that the client mishandles by retrying indefinitely. This behavior can lead to resource exhaustion on both client and server, potentially degrading service availability. Critical infrastructure, cloud providers, and enterprises using NFS for file sharing and storage in Europe could experience disruptions. Additionally, since NFS is widely used in enterprise and data center environments, this vulnerability could be exploited to cause performance degradation or outages in shared storage environments. Although no direct data confidentiality or integrity compromise is indicated, the availability impact could be significant, especially in environments with high NFS traffic or where automated systems rely on stable NFS mounts. The lack of proper error handling also indicates a robustness issue in the Linux NFS client implementation, which could affect operational stability.
Mitigation Recommendations
European organizations should promptly update their Linux kernels to versions that include the patch for CVE-2022-48827. Since the vulnerability is related to the Linux kernel's NFS client and server code, applying official kernel updates from trusted Linux distributions is the most effective mitigation. In environments where immediate patching is not feasible, administrators should consider limiting NFS client access to trusted hosts and monitoring for unusual NFS READ request patterns near the maximum offset values. Network-level controls such as firewall rules or NFS protocol filtering could help mitigate exploitation attempts. Additionally, auditing and logging NFS errors and client retries can help detect potential exploitation attempts. Organizations should also review their NFS client implementations and configurations to ensure they handle server error codes correctly and do not retry indefinitely on ERR_INVAL responses. Engaging with Linux distribution vendors for backported patches and security advisories is recommended. Finally, testing NFS client and server behavior in controlled environments after patching is advised to confirm the fix and prevent regressions.
For access to advanced analysis and higher rate limits, contact root@offseq.com
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.1
- Assigner Short Name
- Linux
- Date Reserved
- 2024-07-16T11:38:08.903Z
- Cisa Enriched
- true
- Cvss Version
- null
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 682d982ec4522896dcbe62d8
Added to database: 5/21/2025, 9:09:02 AM
Last enriched: 6/30/2025, 10:25:49 PM
Last updated: 7/26/2025, 8:30:45 AM
Views: 10
Related Threats
CVE-2025-8690: CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') in addix Simple Responsive Slider
MediumCVE-2025-8688: CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') in ebernstein Inline Stock Quotes
MediumCVE-2025-8685: CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') in emilien Wp chart generator
MediumCVE-2025-8621: CWE-80 Improper Neutralization of Script-Related HTML Tags in a Web Page (Basic XSS) in odn Mosaic Generator
MediumCVE-2025-8568: CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') in prabode GMap Generator
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis are available only with a Pro account. Contact root@offseq.com for access.
External Links
Need enhanced features?
Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.