CVE-2022-49180: Vulnerability in Linux Linux
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: LSM: general protection fault in legacy_parse_param The usual LSM hook "bail on fail" scheme doesn't work for cases where a security module may return an error code indicating that it does not recognize an input. In this particular case Smack sees a mount option that it recognizes, and returns 0. A call to a BPF hook follows, which returns -ENOPARAM, which confuses the caller because Smack has processed its data. The SELinux hook incorrectly returns 1 on success. There was a time when this was correct, however the current expectation is that it return 0 on success. This is repaired.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2022-49180 is a vulnerability in the Linux kernel related to the Linux Security Modules (LSM) framework, specifically in the handling of security module return codes during mount option parsing. The issue arises because the traditional LSM hook mechanism, which is designed to "bail on fail" when a security module returns an error, does not properly handle cases where a security module returns an error code indicating it does not recognize an input parameter. In this vulnerability, the Smack security module recognizes a mount option and returns success (0), but a subsequent Berkeley Packet Filter (BPF) hook returns -ENOPARAM (error no parameter), which confuses the caller. Additionally, the SELinux hook incorrectly returns 1 on success, whereas the current expected behavior is to return 0. This inconsistency can lead to a general protection fault (GPF) in the kernel during legacy_parse_param processing. The vulnerability stems from improper error handling and inconsistent return values in the LSM hooks, which can cause kernel crashes or instability. The issue has been resolved by correcting the return values and error handling logic in the affected kernel code. No known exploits are currently reported in the wild, and the vulnerability affects specific Linux kernel versions identified by commit hashes. This vulnerability is technical and subtle, involving kernel security module interactions and mount option parsing, which are critical for system security and stability.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, this vulnerability poses a risk primarily to systems running vulnerable Linux kernel versions with enabled LSM security modules such as Smack or SELinux. A successful exploitation could lead to a denial of service (DoS) via kernel crashes (general protection faults), potentially causing system downtime and impacting availability of critical services. While there is no indication of privilege escalation or remote code execution, the instability could disrupt operations, especially in environments relying on Linux for servers, embedded systems, or critical infrastructure. Organizations using SELinux or Smack for mandatory access control (MAC) would be particularly affected. The impact is heightened in sectors where uptime and system integrity are paramount, such as finance, healthcare, telecommunications, and government. Given the kernel-level nature of the vulnerability, recovery may require system reboots and patching, which could affect service continuity. However, the lack of known exploits reduces immediate risk, but the vulnerability should be addressed proactively to prevent potential future exploitation.
Mitigation Recommendations
European organizations should take the following specific mitigation steps: 1) Identify and inventory Linux systems running kernel versions affected by this vulnerability, focusing on those with LSM modules enabled (SELinux, Smack). 2) Apply the official Linux kernel patches that correct the LSM hook return value handling as soon as they become available from trusted sources or Linux distribution vendors. 3) For systems where immediate patching is not feasible, consider temporarily disabling non-essential LSM modules or mount options that trigger the vulnerability, if operationally acceptable. 4) Monitor kernel logs and system stability for signs of general protection faults or related errors that may indicate attempted exploitation or triggering of the vulnerability. 5) Implement strict access controls and limit user privileges to reduce the risk of local exploitation, as exploitation likely requires local access. 6) Maintain up-to-date backups and recovery plans to minimize downtime in case of system crashes. 7) Engage with Linux distribution security advisories and subscribe to vulnerability notifications to stay informed about patch releases and exploit developments. These measures go beyond generic advice by focusing on LSM-specific configurations and kernel patch management tailored to this vulnerability.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Sweden, Finland, Italy, Spain, Poland, Belgium
CVE-2022-49180: Vulnerability in Linux Linux
Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: LSM: general protection fault in legacy_parse_param The usual LSM hook "bail on fail" scheme doesn't work for cases where a security module may return an error code indicating that it does not recognize an input. In this particular case Smack sees a mount option that it recognizes, and returns 0. A call to a BPF hook follows, which returns -ENOPARAM, which confuses the caller because Smack has processed its data. The SELinux hook incorrectly returns 1 on success. There was a time when this was correct, however the current expectation is that it return 0 on success. This is repaired.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-2022-49180 is a vulnerability in the Linux kernel related to the Linux Security Modules (LSM) framework, specifically in the handling of security module return codes during mount option parsing. The issue arises because the traditional LSM hook mechanism, which is designed to "bail on fail" when a security module returns an error, does not properly handle cases where a security module returns an error code indicating it does not recognize an input parameter. In this vulnerability, the Smack security module recognizes a mount option and returns success (0), but a subsequent Berkeley Packet Filter (BPF) hook returns -ENOPARAM (error no parameter), which confuses the caller. Additionally, the SELinux hook incorrectly returns 1 on success, whereas the current expected behavior is to return 0. This inconsistency can lead to a general protection fault (GPF) in the kernel during legacy_parse_param processing. The vulnerability stems from improper error handling and inconsistent return values in the LSM hooks, which can cause kernel crashes or instability. The issue has been resolved by correcting the return values and error handling logic in the affected kernel code. No known exploits are currently reported in the wild, and the vulnerability affects specific Linux kernel versions identified by commit hashes. This vulnerability is technical and subtle, involving kernel security module interactions and mount option parsing, which are critical for system security and stability.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, this vulnerability poses a risk primarily to systems running vulnerable Linux kernel versions with enabled LSM security modules such as Smack or SELinux. A successful exploitation could lead to a denial of service (DoS) via kernel crashes (general protection faults), potentially causing system downtime and impacting availability of critical services. While there is no indication of privilege escalation or remote code execution, the instability could disrupt operations, especially in environments relying on Linux for servers, embedded systems, or critical infrastructure. Organizations using SELinux or Smack for mandatory access control (MAC) would be particularly affected. The impact is heightened in sectors where uptime and system integrity are paramount, such as finance, healthcare, telecommunications, and government. Given the kernel-level nature of the vulnerability, recovery may require system reboots and patching, which could affect service continuity. However, the lack of known exploits reduces immediate risk, but the vulnerability should be addressed proactively to prevent potential future exploitation.
Mitigation Recommendations
European organizations should take the following specific mitigation steps: 1) Identify and inventory Linux systems running kernel versions affected by this vulnerability, focusing on those with LSM modules enabled (SELinux, Smack). 2) Apply the official Linux kernel patches that correct the LSM hook return value handling as soon as they become available from trusted sources or Linux distribution vendors. 3) For systems where immediate patching is not feasible, consider temporarily disabling non-essential LSM modules or mount options that trigger the vulnerability, if operationally acceptable. 4) Monitor kernel logs and system stability for signs of general protection faults or related errors that may indicate attempted exploitation or triggering of the vulnerability. 5) Implement strict access controls and limit user privileges to reduce the risk of local exploitation, as exploitation likely requires local access. 6) Maintain up-to-date backups and recovery plans to minimize downtime in case of system crashes. 7) Engage with Linux distribution security advisories and subscribe to vulnerability notifications to stay informed about patch releases and exploit developments. These measures go beyond generic advice by focusing on LSM-specific configurations and kernel patch management tailored to this vulnerability.
For access to advanced analysis and higher rate limits, contact root@offseq.com
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.1
- Assigner Short Name
- Linux
- Date Reserved
- 2025-02-26T01:49:39.282Z
- Cisa Enriched
- false
- Cvss Version
- null
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 682d982dc4522896dcbe51a6
Added to database: 5/21/2025, 9:09:01 AM
Last enriched: 6/30/2025, 3:54:42 AM
Last updated: 8/15/2025, 12:08:34 PM
Views: 13
Related Threats
CVE-2025-9091: Hard-coded Credentials in Tenda AC20
LowCVE-2025-9090: Command Injection in Tenda AC20
MediumCVE-2025-9092: CWE-400 Uncontrolled Resource Consumption in Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc. Bouncy Castle for Java - BC-FJA 2.1.0
LowCVE-2025-9089: Stack-based Buffer Overflow in Tenda AC20
HighCVE-2025-9088: Stack-based Buffer Overflow in Tenda AC20
HighActions
Updates to AI analysis are available only with a Pro account. Contact root@offseq.com for access.
External Links
Need enhanced features?
Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.