CVE-2023-1018VulnerabilityPublished 28 Feb 2023Updated 4 Nov 2025

CVE-2023-1018: Trusted Computing Group TPM2.0 · Out-of-bounds Read

Affects Trusted Computing Group TPM2.0Source CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 5.5 Medium.

Data as of 25 Oct 2026, 19:02 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

5.5Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 5.5% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 92% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Attack Vector: Local
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: None
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality: High
Integrity: None
Availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Local: The vulnerable component is not bound to the network stack and the attacker’s path is via read/write/execute capabilities. Either: the attacker exploits the vulnerability by accessing the target system locally (e.g., keyboard, console), or remotely (e.g., SSH); or the attacker relies on User Interaction by another person to perform actions required to exploit the vulnerability (e.g., tricking a legitimate user into opening a malicious document).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker is authorized with (i.e., requires) privileges that provide basic user capabilities that could normally affect only settings and files owned by a user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges may have the ability to cause an impact only to non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without any interaction from any user.
Scope: Unchanged: An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
Confidentiality: High: There is total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all resources within the impacted component being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact.
Integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the impacted component.
Availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 28 Feb 2023
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-25.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
Trusted Computing Group TPM2.0	Affected =1.59	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

1. Monitor vendor advisories closely and apply firmware or software patches for TPM2.0 version 1.59 as soon as they become available. 2. Restrict local access to systems with TPM2.0 modules to trusted users only, employing strict access controls and endpoint protection to prevent unauthorized local privilege escalation. 3. Implement robust endpoint detection and response (EDR) solutions to monitor for suspicious TPM access patterns or anomalous local activity that could indicate exploitation attempts. 4. Use hardware attestation and integrity checking to detect unauthorized changes or tampering with TPM firmware or related components. 5. Where possible, upgrade TPM firmware to versions beyond 1.59 that address this vulnerability. 6. Conduct regular security audits and penetration tests focusing on local privilege escalation and TPM-related attack vectors. 7. Educate system administrators and security teams about the risks of TPM vulnerabilities and the importance of limiting local access. 8. For highly sensitive environments, consider additional encryption layers or hardware security modules (HSMs) to complement TPM protections.

Description

An out-of-bounds read vulnerability exists in TPM2.0's Module Library allowing a 2-byte read past the end of a TPM2.0 command in the CryptParameterDecryption routine. An attacker who can successfully exploit this vulnerability can read or access sensitive data stored in the TPM.

Impact

For European organizations, the impact of CVE-2023-1018 centers on the potential exposure of sensitive cryptographic material stored within TPM2.0 modules. This could undermine the confidentiality of keys used for disk encryption, secure boot, or authentication tokens, leading to increased risk of data breaches or unauthorized access. Critical sectors such as finance, government, healthcare, and critical infrastructure that rely heavily on TPM for hardware root of trust could face elevated risks. While the vulnerability does not allow direct code execution or system compromise, the leakage of TPM-protected secrets could facilitate further attacks, including privilege escalation or lateral movement. The requirement for local privileges limits remote exploitation but insider threats or malware with local access could exploit this flaw. The absence of known exploits reduces immediate risk, but the potential for sensitive data leakage warrants proactive mitigation. Organizations with high TPM deployment in endpoint devices, servers, or embedded systems should consider this vulnerability a moderate risk to their hardware security posture.

CWE-125Out-of-bounds Read (opens in a new tab)
Base weaknessCWE Top 25 (2025): #8
The product reads data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.
Implementation · Input Validation
Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
Architecture and Design · Language Selection
Use a language that provides appropriate memory abstractions.
OWASP Cheat Sheets
XML Security (opens in a new tab)
Mass Assignment (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V13.3.1 (opens in a new tab)
V5.1.4 (opens in a new tab)
V5.1.3 (opens in a new tab)
Attack patterns
Overread Buffers (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 4 Nov 2025, 21:19 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-125

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats