CVE-2023-2030: CWE-347: Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature in GitLab GitLab
An issue has been discovered in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 12.2 prior to 16.5.6, 16.6 prior to 16.6.4, and 16.7 prior to 16.7.2 in which an attacker could potentially modify the metadata of signed commits.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2023-2030 is a vulnerability identified in GitLab Community Edition (CE) and Enterprise Edition (EE) affecting all versions from 12.2 up to but not including 16.5.6, 16.6 up to 16.6.4, and 16.7 up to 16.7.2. The issue relates to improper verification of cryptographic signatures on commits, classified under CWE-347, which concerns improper verification of cryptographic signatures. Specifically, an attacker with at least limited privileges (PR:L) and requiring user interaction (UI:R) could potentially modify the metadata of signed commits. This means that while the cryptographic signature itself may remain valid, the metadata associated with the commit—such as author information, commit message, or timestamps—could be altered without detection. The vulnerability does not impact the confidentiality of the data but affects the integrity of the commit metadata, which could undermine trust in the provenance and authenticity of code changes. The CVSS v3.1 base score is 3.5 (low severity), reflecting that the attack vector is network-based (AV:N), with low complexity (AC:L), but requires privileges and user interaction. There are no known exploits in the wild at the time of publication, and no official patches are linked in the provided data, though GitLab has released fixed versions beyond the affected ranges. This vulnerability could be leveraged in scenarios where an attacker has some level of access to the GitLab environment and can trick users into performing actions, potentially enabling subtle tampering with commit metadata that might evade detection in code review or audit processes.
Potential Impact
For European organizations relying on GitLab for source code management and CI/CD pipelines, this vulnerability poses a risk to the integrity of their software development lifecycle. While the core codebase remains cryptographically signed and thus protected from unauthorized code changes, the ability to alter commit metadata could lead to confusion or misattribution of code authorship, complicating audit trails and accountability. This can be particularly impactful in regulated industries such as finance, healthcare, and critical infrastructure sectors prevalent in Europe, where traceability and compliance with software supply chain security standards are mandatory. Attackers might exploit this to insert misleading information about who made changes or when, potentially masking insider threats or supply chain attacks. Although the vulnerability does not allow direct code injection or data exfiltration, undermining trust in commit metadata can have downstream effects on vulnerability management, incident response, and forensic investigations. Given the widespread use of GitLab across European enterprises and public sector organizations, the impact could be significant if exploited in targeted attacks, especially in environments with less stringent access controls or where user interaction can be socially engineered.
Mitigation Recommendations
European organizations should prioritize upgrading GitLab instances to versions 16.5.6, 16.6.4, 16.7.2 or later, where this vulnerability has been addressed. Until upgrades are applied, organizations should enforce strict access controls limiting who can push commits and modify repository metadata, minimizing the risk of privilege abuse. Implementing multi-factor authentication (MFA) for GitLab users can reduce the likelihood of compromised credentials being used to exploit this vulnerability. Additionally, organizations should enhance monitoring and auditing of commit metadata changes, employing automated tools to detect anomalies or inconsistencies in commit history. Educating developers and users about the risk of social engineering attacks that require user interaction can further reduce exploitation chances. Integrating external code signing verification tools or policies that validate commit metadata integrity as part of the CI/CD pipeline can provide an additional layer of defense. Finally, organizations should review and tighten their software supply chain security policies to ensure that any metadata tampering is promptly detected and investigated.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Sweden, Italy, Spain, Poland, Belgium, Finland
CVE-2023-2030: CWE-347: Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature in GitLab GitLab
Description
An issue has been discovered in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 12.2 prior to 16.5.6, 16.6 prior to 16.6.4, and 16.7 prior to 16.7.2 in which an attacker could potentially modify the metadata of signed commits.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-2023-2030 is a vulnerability identified in GitLab Community Edition (CE) and Enterprise Edition (EE) affecting all versions from 12.2 up to but not including 16.5.6, 16.6 up to 16.6.4, and 16.7 up to 16.7.2. The issue relates to improper verification of cryptographic signatures on commits, classified under CWE-347, which concerns improper verification of cryptographic signatures. Specifically, an attacker with at least limited privileges (PR:L) and requiring user interaction (UI:R) could potentially modify the metadata of signed commits. This means that while the cryptographic signature itself may remain valid, the metadata associated with the commit—such as author information, commit message, or timestamps—could be altered without detection. The vulnerability does not impact the confidentiality of the data but affects the integrity of the commit metadata, which could undermine trust in the provenance and authenticity of code changes. The CVSS v3.1 base score is 3.5 (low severity), reflecting that the attack vector is network-based (AV:N), with low complexity (AC:L), but requires privileges and user interaction. There are no known exploits in the wild at the time of publication, and no official patches are linked in the provided data, though GitLab has released fixed versions beyond the affected ranges. This vulnerability could be leveraged in scenarios where an attacker has some level of access to the GitLab environment and can trick users into performing actions, potentially enabling subtle tampering with commit metadata that might evade detection in code review or audit processes.
Potential Impact
For European organizations relying on GitLab for source code management and CI/CD pipelines, this vulnerability poses a risk to the integrity of their software development lifecycle. While the core codebase remains cryptographically signed and thus protected from unauthorized code changes, the ability to alter commit metadata could lead to confusion or misattribution of code authorship, complicating audit trails and accountability. This can be particularly impactful in regulated industries such as finance, healthcare, and critical infrastructure sectors prevalent in Europe, where traceability and compliance with software supply chain security standards are mandatory. Attackers might exploit this to insert misleading information about who made changes or when, potentially masking insider threats or supply chain attacks. Although the vulnerability does not allow direct code injection or data exfiltration, undermining trust in commit metadata can have downstream effects on vulnerability management, incident response, and forensic investigations. Given the widespread use of GitLab across European enterprises and public sector organizations, the impact could be significant if exploited in targeted attacks, especially in environments with less stringent access controls or where user interaction can be socially engineered.
Mitigation Recommendations
European organizations should prioritize upgrading GitLab instances to versions 16.5.6, 16.6.4, 16.7.2 or later, where this vulnerability has been addressed. Until upgrades are applied, organizations should enforce strict access controls limiting who can push commits and modify repository metadata, minimizing the risk of privilege abuse. Implementing multi-factor authentication (MFA) for GitLab users can reduce the likelihood of compromised credentials being used to exploit this vulnerability. Additionally, organizations should enhance monitoring and auditing of commit metadata changes, employing automated tools to detect anomalies or inconsistencies in commit history. Educating developers and users about the risk of social engineering attacks that require user interaction can further reduce exploitation chances. Integrating external code signing verification tools or policies that validate commit metadata integrity as part of the CI/CD pipeline can provide an additional layer of defense. Finally, organizations should review and tighten their software supply chain security policies to ensure that any metadata tampering is promptly detected and investigated.
For access to advanced analysis and higher rate limits, contact root@offseq.com
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.1
- Assigner Short Name
- GitLab
- Date Reserved
- 2023-04-13T18:20:57.328Z
- Cisa Enriched
- false
- Cvss Version
- 3.1
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 682ea68a0acd01a249253f15
Added to database: 5/22/2025, 4:22:34 AM
Last enriched: 7/7/2025, 11:11:36 AM
Last updated: 8/15/2025, 8:53:30 AM
Views: 14
Related Threats
CVE-2025-53948: CWE-415 Double Free in Santesoft Sante PACS Server
HighCVE-2025-52584: CWE-122 Heap-based Buffer Overflow in Ashlar-Vellum Cobalt
HighCVE-2025-46269: CWE-122 Heap-based Buffer Overflow in Ashlar-Vellum Cobalt
HighCVE-2025-54862: CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (XSS or 'Cross-site Scripting') in Santesoft Sante PACS Server
MediumCVE-2025-54759: CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (XSS or 'Cross-site Scripting') in Santesoft Sante PACS Server
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis are available only with a Pro account. Contact root@offseq.com for access.
Need enhanced features?
Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.