CVE-2023-43785VulnerabilityPublished 10 Oct 2023Updated 6 Nov 2025

CVE-2023-43785: Out-of-bounds Write

Source CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 6.5 Medium.

Data as of 25 Oct 2026, 19:02 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

6.5Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.6% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 51% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: Required
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality: High
Integrity: None
Availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: Required: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires a user to take some action before the vulnerability can be exploited.
Scope: Unchanged: An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
Confidentiality: High: There is total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all resources within the impacted component being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact.
Integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the impacted component.
Availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 10 Oct 2023
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-25.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

AI-suggested

1. Monitor for updates from Linux distribution vendors and libX11 maintainers and apply patches promptly once available. 2. Restrict local user access on systems running graphical Linux environments to trusted personnel only. 3. Employ strict user privilege separation and minimize the number of users with local access to sensitive systems. 4. Use security mechanisms such as SELinux or AppArmor to confine applications and limit their ability to access sensitive memory regions. 5. Audit and monitor local user activities for unusual behavior that might indicate attempts to exploit this vulnerability. 6. Consider disabling or limiting the use of graphical environments on servers or systems where not required to reduce the attack surface. 7. Educate users about the risks of running untrusted applications that might trigger the vulnerability. 8. Implement memory protection techniques and address space layout randomization (ASLR) to reduce the likelihood of successful information disclosure.

Description

A vulnerability was found in libX11 due to a boundary condition within the _XkbReadKeySyms() function. This flaw allows a local user to trigger an out-of-bounds read error and read the contents of memory on the system.

Impact

The primary impact of CVE-2023-43785 is confidentiality loss due to out-of-bounds memory reads by local users. For European organizations, this could mean exposure of sensitive data such as cryptographic keys, passwords, or other confidential information residing in memory. While the vulnerability does not allow privilege escalation or denial of service, the information disclosure could facilitate subsequent attacks, including privilege escalation or lateral movement within networks. Organizations with multi-user environments, shared workstations, or environments where local user access is not tightly controlled are at higher risk. The impact is more pronounced in sectors handling sensitive data, such as finance, government, healthcare, and critical infrastructure. Since the vulnerability requires local access and user interaction, remote exploitation is not feasible, limiting the attack surface primarily to insiders or compromised accounts. However, given the widespread use of libX11 in Linux graphical environments across Europe, the potential for information leakage is significant if not addressed promptly.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…