CVE-2023-52636: Vulnerability in Linux Linux
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: libceph: just wait for more data to be available on the socket A short read may occur while reading the message footer from the socket. Later, when the socket is ready for another read, the messenger invokes all read_partial_*() handlers, including read_partial_sparse_msg_data(). The expectation is that read_partial_sparse_msg_data() would bail, allowing the messenger to invoke read_partial() for the footer and pick up where it left off. However read_partial_sparse_msg_data() violates that and ends up calling into the state machine in the OSD client. The sparse-read state machine assumes that it's a new op and interprets some piece of the footer as the sparse-read header and returns bogus extents/data length, etc. To determine whether read_partial_sparse_msg_data() should bail, let's reuse cursor->total_resid. Because once it reaches to zero that means all the extents and data have been successfully received in last read, else it could break out when partially reading any of the extents and data. And then osd_sparse_read() could continue where it left off. [ idryomov: changelog ]
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2023-52636 is a vulnerability identified in the Linux kernel's Ceph client implementation, specifically within the libceph component responsible for handling Ceph distributed storage communication. The issue arises during the processing of socket reads related to sparse reads in the Ceph Object Storage Daemon (OSD) client. When reading the message footer from the socket, a short read may occur, meaning that only part of the expected data is received. The messenger component is designed to handle partial reads by invoking various read_partial_*() handlers, including read_partial_sparse_msg_data(). However, this function incorrectly proceeds to call into the OSD client's state machine even when it should bail out and wait for the complete data. This leads to the state machine misinterpreting footer data as a new sparse-read header, resulting in bogus extents and data lengths being processed. The root cause is that read_partial_sparse_msg_data() does not properly check whether all data has been received before continuing, violating the expected control flow. The fix involves reusing the cursor->total_resid field to determine if all extents and data have been fully received; if not, the function bails out correctly, allowing the osd_sparse_read() to resume properly once more data arrives. This vulnerability could cause incorrect processing of sparse read operations, potentially leading to data corruption or denial of service in Ceph clients running on affected Linux kernels. No known exploits are currently reported in the wild, and no CVSS score has been assigned yet.
Potential Impact
For European organizations relying on Linux systems with Ceph storage clusters, this vulnerability poses a risk primarily to data integrity and availability. Ceph is widely used in enterprise and cloud environments for scalable distributed storage, including in sectors such as finance, healthcare, telecommunications, and public administration across Europe. If exploited, the vulnerability could cause Ceph clients to misinterpret sparse read data, potentially resulting in corrupted data reads or application errors. This could disrupt critical storage services, leading to downtime or data loss. Although no remote code execution or privilege escalation is indicated, the impact on data integrity and availability can be significant, especially for organizations with large-scale Ceph deployments. The absence of known exploits suggests limited immediate risk, but the complexity of Ceph environments and the critical nature of storage services mean that timely patching is important to prevent potential exploitation or accidental data corruption.
Mitigation Recommendations
European organizations using Linux with Ceph should prioritize applying the official Linux kernel patches that address CVE-2023-52636 as soon as they become available. Since the vulnerability involves the Ceph client library in the kernel, updating to the fixed kernel version is the most effective mitigation. In addition, organizations should: 1) Audit their Ceph client deployments to identify affected kernel versions and plan coordinated patching to minimize service disruption. 2) Implement monitoring of Ceph client logs and storage cluster health to detect anomalies potentially related to sparse read errors or data inconsistencies. 3) Perform regular backups and data integrity checks on Ceph storage to mitigate potential data corruption impact. 4) Limit exposure by restricting access to Ceph client nodes and ensuring network segmentation to reduce the attack surface. 5) Engage with Linux distribution vendors and Ceph maintainers for guidance on backported patches or interim mitigations if immediate kernel upgrades are not feasible. These steps go beyond generic advice by focusing on the specific Ceph sparse read context and operational considerations for distributed storage environments.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Sweden, Finland, Norway, Italy, Spain, Poland
CVE-2023-52636: Vulnerability in Linux Linux
Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: libceph: just wait for more data to be available on the socket A short read may occur while reading the message footer from the socket. Later, when the socket is ready for another read, the messenger invokes all read_partial_*() handlers, including read_partial_sparse_msg_data(). The expectation is that read_partial_sparse_msg_data() would bail, allowing the messenger to invoke read_partial() for the footer and pick up where it left off. However read_partial_sparse_msg_data() violates that and ends up calling into the state machine in the OSD client. The sparse-read state machine assumes that it's a new op and interprets some piece of the footer as the sparse-read header and returns bogus extents/data length, etc. To determine whether read_partial_sparse_msg_data() should bail, let's reuse cursor->total_resid. Because once it reaches to zero that means all the extents and data have been successfully received in last read, else it could break out when partially reading any of the extents and data. And then osd_sparse_read() could continue where it left off. [ idryomov: changelog ]
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-2023-52636 is a vulnerability identified in the Linux kernel's Ceph client implementation, specifically within the libceph component responsible for handling Ceph distributed storage communication. The issue arises during the processing of socket reads related to sparse reads in the Ceph Object Storage Daemon (OSD) client. When reading the message footer from the socket, a short read may occur, meaning that only part of the expected data is received. The messenger component is designed to handle partial reads by invoking various read_partial_*() handlers, including read_partial_sparse_msg_data(). However, this function incorrectly proceeds to call into the OSD client's state machine even when it should bail out and wait for the complete data. This leads to the state machine misinterpreting footer data as a new sparse-read header, resulting in bogus extents and data lengths being processed. The root cause is that read_partial_sparse_msg_data() does not properly check whether all data has been received before continuing, violating the expected control flow. The fix involves reusing the cursor->total_resid field to determine if all extents and data have been fully received; if not, the function bails out correctly, allowing the osd_sparse_read() to resume properly once more data arrives. This vulnerability could cause incorrect processing of sparse read operations, potentially leading to data corruption or denial of service in Ceph clients running on affected Linux kernels. No known exploits are currently reported in the wild, and no CVSS score has been assigned yet.
Potential Impact
For European organizations relying on Linux systems with Ceph storage clusters, this vulnerability poses a risk primarily to data integrity and availability. Ceph is widely used in enterprise and cloud environments for scalable distributed storage, including in sectors such as finance, healthcare, telecommunications, and public administration across Europe. If exploited, the vulnerability could cause Ceph clients to misinterpret sparse read data, potentially resulting in corrupted data reads or application errors. This could disrupt critical storage services, leading to downtime or data loss. Although no remote code execution or privilege escalation is indicated, the impact on data integrity and availability can be significant, especially for organizations with large-scale Ceph deployments. The absence of known exploits suggests limited immediate risk, but the complexity of Ceph environments and the critical nature of storage services mean that timely patching is important to prevent potential exploitation or accidental data corruption.
Mitigation Recommendations
European organizations using Linux with Ceph should prioritize applying the official Linux kernel patches that address CVE-2023-52636 as soon as they become available. Since the vulnerability involves the Ceph client library in the kernel, updating to the fixed kernel version is the most effective mitigation. In addition, organizations should: 1) Audit their Ceph client deployments to identify affected kernel versions and plan coordinated patching to minimize service disruption. 2) Implement monitoring of Ceph client logs and storage cluster health to detect anomalies potentially related to sparse read errors or data inconsistencies. 3) Perform regular backups and data integrity checks on Ceph storage to mitigate potential data corruption impact. 4) Limit exposure by restricting access to Ceph client nodes and ensuring network segmentation to reduce the attack surface. 5) Engage with Linux distribution vendors and Ceph maintainers for guidance on backported patches or interim mitigations if immediate kernel upgrades are not feasible. These steps go beyond generic advice by focusing on the specific Ceph sparse read context and operational considerations for distributed storage environments.
For access to advanced analysis and higher rate limits, contact root@offseq.com
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.1
- Assigner Short Name
- Linux
- Date Reserved
- 2024-03-06T09:52:12.093Z
- Cisa Enriched
- true
- Cvss Version
- null
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 682d9830c4522896dcbe717d
Added to database: 5/21/2025, 9:09:04 AM
Last enriched: 7/1/2025, 5:09:53 AM
Last updated: 7/29/2025, 2:31:34 AM
Views: 11
Related Threats
CVE-2025-8963: Deserialization in jeecgboot JimuReport
MediumCVE-2025-8715: Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences ('CRLF Injection') in PostgreSQL
HighCVE-2025-8714: Inclusion of Functionality from Untrusted Control Sphere in PostgreSQL
HighCVE-2025-8713: Exposure of Sensitive Information Through Metadata in PostgreSQL
LowCVE-2025-8961: Memory Corruption in LibTIFF
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis are available only with a Pro account. Contact root@offseq.com for access.
External Links
Need enhanced features?
Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.