CVE-2023-52828: Vulnerability in Linux Linux
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Detect IP == ksym.end as part of BPF program Now that bpf_throw kfunc is the first such call instruction that has noreturn semantics within the verifier, this also kicks in dead code elimination in unprecedented ways. For one, any instruction following a bpf_throw call will never be marked as seen. Moreover, if a callchain ends up throwing, any instructions after the call instruction to the eventually throwing subprog in callers will also never be marked as seen. The tempting way to fix this would be to emit extra 'int3' instructions which bump the jited_len of a program, and ensure that during runtime when a program throws, we can discover its boundaries even if the call instruction to bpf_throw (or to subprogs that always throw) is emitted as the final instruction in the program. An example of such a program would be this: do_something(): ... r0 = 0 exit foo(): r1 = 0 call bpf_throw r0 = 0 exit bar(cond): if r1 != 0 goto pc+2 call do_something exit call foo r0 = 0 // Never seen by verifier exit // main(ctx): r1 = ... call bar r0 = 0 exit Here, if we do end up throwing, the stacktrace would be the following: bpf_throw foo bar main In bar, the final instruction emitted will be the call to foo, as such, the return address will be the subsequent instruction (which the JIT emits as int3 on x86). This will end up lying outside the jited_len of the program, thus, when unwinding, we will fail to discover the return address as belonging to any program and end up in a panic due to the unreliable stack unwinding of BPF programs that we never expect. To remedy this case, make bpf_prog_ksym_find treat IP == ksym.end as part of the BPF program, so that is_bpf_text_address returns true when such a case occurs, and we are able to unwind reliably when the final instruction ends up being a call instruction.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2023-52828 is a vulnerability in the Linux kernel's eBPF (extended Berkeley Packet Filter) subsystem, specifically related to the handling of the bpf_throw kernel function (kfunc) within BPF programs. The vulnerability arises from how the BPF verifier and JIT compiler handle instructions following a bpf_throw call, which has noreturn semantics. When bpf_throw is called, any instructions after it are never marked as seen by the verifier, leading to dead code elimination in unexpected ways. This causes the JIT-compiled program's length (jited_len) to not account for instructions after the bpf_throw call, which can result in unreliable stack unwinding during runtime if the program throws an exception. The issue manifests when the return address after a call to a throwing subprogram lies outside the recognized bounds of the BPF program, causing kernel panics due to failed stack unwinding. The fix involves modifying the bpf_prog_ksym_find function to treat the instruction pointer equal to the program's end address (ksym.end) as part of the BPF program, allowing is_bpf_text_address to return true in these edge cases and enabling reliable stack unwinding. This vulnerability affects certain Linux kernel versions identified by specific commit hashes. The CVSS v3.1 score is 6.6 (medium severity), reflecting a local attack vector with low attack complexity, requiring privileges, no user interaction, and impacting confidentiality (high), integrity (low), and availability (low). No known exploits are reported in the wild at this time.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, this vulnerability poses a risk primarily to systems running vulnerable Linux kernel versions with eBPF enabled, especially those utilizing BPF programs for networking, security monitoring, or system tracing. Exploitation could lead to kernel panics causing denial of service (availability impact) and potential leakage of sensitive kernel memory (confidentiality impact). The requirement for local privileges limits remote exploitation but insider threats or compromised accounts could leverage this flaw to disrupt critical infrastructure or sensitive services. Given the widespread use of Linux in European data centers, cloud environments, and embedded systems, this vulnerability could affect a broad range of sectors including telecommunications, finance, manufacturing, and public services. The medium severity rating suggests moderate urgency; however, the potential for kernel panics and confidentiality breaches necessitates timely patching to maintain system stability and data protection compliance under regulations like GDPR.
Mitigation Recommendations
European organizations should prioritize updating their Linux kernels to versions that include the fix for CVE-2023-52828. Since the vulnerability involves kernel-level code, applying vendor-supplied security patches or upgrading to the latest stable kernel releases is essential. For environments where immediate patching is not feasible, organizations should restrict local access to trusted users only, enforce strict privilege separation, and monitor for unusual kernel panics or system crashes indicative of exploitation attempts. Additionally, auditing BPF program usage and limiting the loading of untrusted or unnecessary BPF programs can reduce attack surface. Employing kernel hardening techniques such as SELinux or AppArmor profiles to constrain BPF program capabilities may also mitigate risk. Finally, maintain up-to-date intrusion detection systems capable of recognizing anomalous kernel behavior related to BPF execution.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Sweden, Finland, Italy, Spain, Poland, Belgium
CVE-2023-52828: Vulnerability in Linux Linux
Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Detect IP == ksym.end as part of BPF program Now that bpf_throw kfunc is the first such call instruction that has noreturn semantics within the verifier, this also kicks in dead code elimination in unprecedented ways. For one, any instruction following a bpf_throw call will never be marked as seen. Moreover, if a callchain ends up throwing, any instructions after the call instruction to the eventually throwing subprog in callers will also never be marked as seen. The tempting way to fix this would be to emit extra 'int3' instructions which bump the jited_len of a program, and ensure that during runtime when a program throws, we can discover its boundaries even if the call instruction to bpf_throw (or to subprogs that always throw) is emitted as the final instruction in the program. An example of such a program would be this: do_something(): ... r0 = 0 exit foo(): r1 = 0 call bpf_throw r0 = 0 exit bar(cond): if r1 != 0 goto pc+2 call do_something exit call foo r0 = 0 // Never seen by verifier exit // main(ctx): r1 = ... call bar r0 = 0 exit Here, if we do end up throwing, the stacktrace would be the following: bpf_throw foo bar main In bar, the final instruction emitted will be the call to foo, as such, the return address will be the subsequent instruction (which the JIT emits as int3 on x86). This will end up lying outside the jited_len of the program, thus, when unwinding, we will fail to discover the return address as belonging to any program and end up in a panic due to the unreliable stack unwinding of BPF programs that we never expect. To remedy this case, make bpf_prog_ksym_find treat IP == ksym.end as part of the BPF program, so that is_bpf_text_address returns true when such a case occurs, and we are able to unwind reliably when the final instruction ends up being a call instruction.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-2023-52828 is a vulnerability in the Linux kernel's eBPF (extended Berkeley Packet Filter) subsystem, specifically related to the handling of the bpf_throw kernel function (kfunc) within BPF programs. The vulnerability arises from how the BPF verifier and JIT compiler handle instructions following a bpf_throw call, which has noreturn semantics. When bpf_throw is called, any instructions after it are never marked as seen by the verifier, leading to dead code elimination in unexpected ways. This causes the JIT-compiled program's length (jited_len) to not account for instructions after the bpf_throw call, which can result in unreliable stack unwinding during runtime if the program throws an exception. The issue manifests when the return address after a call to a throwing subprogram lies outside the recognized bounds of the BPF program, causing kernel panics due to failed stack unwinding. The fix involves modifying the bpf_prog_ksym_find function to treat the instruction pointer equal to the program's end address (ksym.end) as part of the BPF program, allowing is_bpf_text_address to return true in these edge cases and enabling reliable stack unwinding. This vulnerability affects certain Linux kernel versions identified by specific commit hashes. The CVSS v3.1 score is 6.6 (medium severity), reflecting a local attack vector with low attack complexity, requiring privileges, no user interaction, and impacting confidentiality (high), integrity (low), and availability (low). No known exploits are reported in the wild at this time.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, this vulnerability poses a risk primarily to systems running vulnerable Linux kernel versions with eBPF enabled, especially those utilizing BPF programs for networking, security monitoring, or system tracing. Exploitation could lead to kernel panics causing denial of service (availability impact) and potential leakage of sensitive kernel memory (confidentiality impact). The requirement for local privileges limits remote exploitation but insider threats or compromised accounts could leverage this flaw to disrupt critical infrastructure or sensitive services. Given the widespread use of Linux in European data centers, cloud environments, and embedded systems, this vulnerability could affect a broad range of sectors including telecommunications, finance, manufacturing, and public services. The medium severity rating suggests moderate urgency; however, the potential for kernel panics and confidentiality breaches necessitates timely patching to maintain system stability and data protection compliance under regulations like GDPR.
Mitigation Recommendations
European organizations should prioritize updating their Linux kernels to versions that include the fix for CVE-2023-52828. Since the vulnerability involves kernel-level code, applying vendor-supplied security patches or upgrading to the latest stable kernel releases is essential. For environments where immediate patching is not feasible, organizations should restrict local access to trusted users only, enforce strict privilege separation, and monitor for unusual kernel panics or system crashes indicative of exploitation attempts. Additionally, auditing BPF program usage and limiting the loading of untrusted or unnecessary BPF programs can reduce attack surface. Employing kernel hardening techniques such as SELinux or AppArmor profiles to constrain BPF program capabilities may also mitigate risk. Finally, maintain up-to-date intrusion detection systems capable of recognizing anomalous kernel behavior related to BPF execution.
For access to advanced analysis and higher rate limits, contact root@offseq.com
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.1
- Assigner Short Name
- Linux
- Date Reserved
- 2024-05-21T15:19:24.251Z
- Cisa Enriched
- true
- Cvss Version
- 3.1
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 682d9830c4522896dcbe76a3
Added to database: 5/21/2025, 9:09:04 AM
Last enriched: 7/1/2025, 7:27:14 AM
Last updated: 8/12/2025, 1:32:20 PM
Views: 17
Related Threats
CVE-2025-53948: CWE-415 Double Free in Santesoft Sante PACS Server
HighCVE-2025-52584: CWE-122 Heap-based Buffer Overflow in Ashlar-Vellum Cobalt
HighCVE-2025-46269: CWE-122 Heap-based Buffer Overflow in Ashlar-Vellum Cobalt
HighCVE-2025-54862: CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (XSS or 'Cross-site Scripting') in Santesoft Sante PACS Server
MediumCVE-2025-54759: CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (XSS or 'Cross-site Scripting') in Santesoft Sante PACS Server
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis are available only with a Pro account. Contact root@offseq.com for access.
External Links
Need enhanced features?
Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.