CVE-2023-52920: Vulnerability in Linux Linux
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: support non-r10 register spill/fill to/from stack in precision tracking Use instruction (jump) history to record instructions that performed register spill/fill to/from stack, regardless if this was done through read-only r10 register, or any other register after copying r10 into it *and* potentially adjusting offset. To make this work reliably, we push extra per-instruction flags into instruction history, encoding stack slot index (spi) and stack frame number in extra 10 bit flags we take away from prev_idx in instruction history. We don't touch idx field for maximum performance, as it's checked most frequently during backtracking. This change removes basically the last remaining practical limitation of precision backtracking logic in BPF verifier. It fixes known deficiencies, but also opens up new opportunities to reduce number of verified states, explored in the subsequent patches. There are only three differences in selftests' BPF object files according to veristat, all in the positive direction (less states). File Program Insns (A) Insns (B) Insns (DIFF) States (A) States (B) States (DIFF) -------------------------------------- ------------- --------- --------- ------------- ---------- ---------- ------------- test_cls_redirect_dynptr.bpf.linked3.o cls_redirect 2987 2864 -123 (-4.12%) 240 231 -9 (-3.75%) xdp_synproxy_kern.bpf.linked3.o syncookie_tc 82848 82661 -187 (-0.23%) 5107 5073 -34 (-0.67%) xdp_synproxy_kern.bpf.linked3.o syncookie_xdp 85116 84964 -152 (-0.18%) 5162 5130 -32 (-0.62%) Note, I avoided renaming jmp_history to more generic insn_hist to minimize number of lines changed and potential merge conflicts between bpf and bpf-next trees. Notice also cur_hist_entry pointer reset to NULL at the beginning of instruction verification loop. This pointer avoids the problem of relying on last jump history entry's insn_idx to determine whether we already have entry for current instruction or not. It can happen that we added jump history entry because current instruction is_jmp_point(), but also we need to add instruction flags for stack access. In this case, we don't want to entries, so we need to reuse last added entry, if it is present. Relying on insn_idx comparison has the same ambiguity problem as the one that was fixed recently in [0], so we avoid that. [0] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20231110002638.4168352-3-andrii@kernel.org/
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2023-52920 addresses a vulnerability in the Linux kernel's Berkeley Packet Filter (BPF) verifier, specifically related to the precision tracking of register spill and fill operations to and from the stack. The BPF verifier is a critical component that ensures the safety and correctness of BPF programs before they are executed in kernel space. This vulnerability pertains to how the verifier tracks instructions that perform register spill/fill operations, particularly when these operations involve registers other than the read-only r10 register, which is conventionally used for stack pointer operations in BPF. The fix involves enhancing the instruction history tracking mechanism by encoding additional per-instruction flags that represent stack slot indices and stack frame numbers. This change removes a significant limitation in the precision backtracking logic of the BPF verifier, allowing it to more accurately and efficiently verify BPF programs. The update reduces the number of verified states, which improves verifier performance and correctness, as demonstrated by the reduced states and instructions in self-tests. The vulnerability fix also addresses ambiguities in jump history entries and instruction verification loops, preventing potential inconsistencies in the verifier's state tracking. Although the patch does not explicitly describe an exploit scenario, the underlying issue could have allowed malformed or malicious BPF programs to bypass verifier checks, potentially leading to kernel memory corruption or privilege escalation. The fix thus strengthens the kernel's security posture by ensuring more rigorous verification of BPF programs.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of this vulnerability lies primarily in the security and stability of Linux-based systems that utilize BPF for networking, security monitoring, or performance tracing. BPF is widely used in modern Linux kernels for packet filtering, firewalling, and observability tools, making this vulnerability relevant to servers, cloud infrastructure, and embedded devices running Linux. Exploitation could allow attackers to execute unauthorized code or escalate privileges within the kernel, compromising system confidentiality, integrity, and availability. This could lead to data breaches, disruption of critical services, or unauthorized access to sensitive systems. Given the prevalence of Linux in European enterprise environments, cloud providers, and critical infrastructure, unpatched systems could be at risk of targeted attacks or exploitation by sophisticated threat actors. The absence of known exploits in the wild reduces immediate risk but does not eliminate the potential for future exploitation, especially as attackers analyze the patch to develop bypass techniques. Organizations relying on BPF-enabled Linux kernels should prioritize patching to maintain system security and operational continuity.
Mitigation Recommendations
European organizations should implement the following specific mitigation measures: 1) Promptly update Linux kernels to versions that include the CVE-2023-52920 patch, ensuring that all affected systems, especially those running BPF-dependent applications, are upgraded. 2) Audit and monitor BPF program usage within the environment, restricting the loading of untrusted or unsigned BPF programs to minimize attack surface. 3) Employ kernel security modules and mandatory access controls (e.g., SELinux, AppArmor) to limit the capabilities of processes that can load or interact with BPF programs. 4) Utilize runtime monitoring tools to detect anomalous kernel behavior or unusual BPF activity that could indicate exploitation attempts. 5) For cloud and containerized environments, enforce strict policies on kernel module loading and BPF program execution, leveraging container security frameworks to isolate workloads. 6) Maintain an inventory of Linux kernel versions deployed across the organization to identify and remediate vulnerable instances efficiently. These targeted actions go beyond generic patching advice by focusing on controlling BPF program execution and enhancing detection capabilities.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Sweden, Finland, Norway, Denmark, Italy, Spain
CVE-2023-52920: Vulnerability in Linux Linux
Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: support non-r10 register spill/fill to/from stack in precision tracking Use instruction (jump) history to record instructions that performed register spill/fill to/from stack, regardless if this was done through read-only r10 register, or any other register after copying r10 into it *and* potentially adjusting offset. To make this work reliably, we push extra per-instruction flags into instruction history, encoding stack slot index (spi) and stack frame number in extra 10 bit flags we take away from prev_idx in instruction history. We don't touch idx field for maximum performance, as it's checked most frequently during backtracking. This change removes basically the last remaining practical limitation of precision backtracking logic in BPF verifier. It fixes known deficiencies, but also opens up new opportunities to reduce number of verified states, explored in the subsequent patches. There are only three differences in selftests' BPF object files according to veristat, all in the positive direction (less states). File Program Insns (A) Insns (B) Insns (DIFF) States (A) States (B) States (DIFF) -------------------------------------- ------------- --------- --------- ------------- ---------- ---------- ------------- test_cls_redirect_dynptr.bpf.linked3.o cls_redirect 2987 2864 -123 (-4.12%) 240 231 -9 (-3.75%) xdp_synproxy_kern.bpf.linked3.o syncookie_tc 82848 82661 -187 (-0.23%) 5107 5073 -34 (-0.67%) xdp_synproxy_kern.bpf.linked3.o syncookie_xdp 85116 84964 -152 (-0.18%) 5162 5130 -32 (-0.62%) Note, I avoided renaming jmp_history to more generic insn_hist to minimize number of lines changed and potential merge conflicts between bpf and bpf-next trees. Notice also cur_hist_entry pointer reset to NULL at the beginning of instruction verification loop. This pointer avoids the problem of relying on last jump history entry's insn_idx to determine whether we already have entry for current instruction or not. It can happen that we added jump history entry because current instruction is_jmp_point(), but also we need to add instruction flags for stack access. In this case, we don't want to entries, so we need to reuse last added entry, if it is present. Relying on insn_idx comparison has the same ambiguity problem as the one that was fixed recently in [0], so we avoid that. [0] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20231110002638.4168352-3-andrii@kernel.org/
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-2023-52920 addresses a vulnerability in the Linux kernel's Berkeley Packet Filter (BPF) verifier, specifically related to the precision tracking of register spill and fill operations to and from the stack. The BPF verifier is a critical component that ensures the safety and correctness of BPF programs before they are executed in kernel space. This vulnerability pertains to how the verifier tracks instructions that perform register spill/fill operations, particularly when these operations involve registers other than the read-only r10 register, which is conventionally used for stack pointer operations in BPF. The fix involves enhancing the instruction history tracking mechanism by encoding additional per-instruction flags that represent stack slot indices and stack frame numbers. This change removes a significant limitation in the precision backtracking logic of the BPF verifier, allowing it to more accurately and efficiently verify BPF programs. The update reduces the number of verified states, which improves verifier performance and correctness, as demonstrated by the reduced states and instructions in self-tests. The vulnerability fix also addresses ambiguities in jump history entries and instruction verification loops, preventing potential inconsistencies in the verifier's state tracking. Although the patch does not explicitly describe an exploit scenario, the underlying issue could have allowed malformed or malicious BPF programs to bypass verifier checks, potentially leading to kernel memory corruption or privilege escalation. The fix thus strengthens the kernel's security posture by ensuring more rigorous verification of BPF programs.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of this vulnerability lies primarily in the security and stability of Linux-based systems that utilize BPF for networking, security monitoring, or performance tracing. BPF is widely used in modern Linux kernels for packet filtering, firewalling, and observability tools, making this vulnerability relevant to servers, cloud infrastructure, and embedded devices running Linux. Exploitation could allow attackers to execute unauthorized code or escalate privileges within the kernel, compromising system confidentiality, integrity, and availability. This could lead to data breaches, disruption of critical services, or unauthorized access to sensitive systems. Given the prevalence of Linux in European enterprise environments, cloud providers, and critical infrastructure, unpatched systems could be at risk of targeted attacks or exploitation by sophisticated threat actors. The absence of known exploits in the wild reduces immediate risk but does not eliminate the potential for future exploitation, especially as attackers analyze the patch to develop bypass techniques. Organizations relying on BPF-enabled Linux kernels should prioritize patching to maintain system security and operational continuity.
Mitigation Recommendations
European organizations should implement the following specific mitigation measures: 1) Promptly update Linux kernels to versions that include the CVE-2023-52920 patch, ensuring that all affected systems, especially those running BPF-dependent applications, are upgraded. 2) Audit and monitor BPF program usage within the environment, restricting the loading of untrusted or unsigned BPF programs to minimize attack surface. 3) Employ kernel security modules and mandatory access controls (e.g., SELinux, AppArmor) to limit the capabilities of processes that can load or interact with BPF programs. 4) Utilize runtime monitoring tools to detect anomalous kernel behavior or unusual BPF activity that could indicate exploitation attempts. 5) For cloud and containerized environments, enforce strict policies on kernel module loading and BPF program execution, leveraging container security frameworks to isolate workloads. 6) Maintain an inventory of Linux kernel versions deployed across the organization to identify and remediate vulnerable instances efficiently. These targeted actions go beyond generic patching advice by focusing on controlling BPF program execution and enhancing detection capabilities.
For access to advanced analysis and higher rate limits, contact root@offseq.com
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.1
- Assigner Short Name
- Linux
- Date Reserved
- 2024-08-21T06:07:11.017Z
- Cisa Enriched
- false
- Cvss Version
- null
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 682d9831c4522896dcbe7911
Added to database: 5/21/2025, 9:09:05 AM
Last enriched: 7/1/2025, 8:41:35 AM
Last updated: 8/10/2025, 12:55:39 PM
Views: 8
Related Threats
CVE-2025-8843: Heap-based Buffer Overflow in NASM Netwide Assember
MediumCVE-2025-8842: Use After Free in NASM Netwide Assember
MediumResearchers Detail Windows EPM Poisoning Exploit Chain Leading to Domain Privilege Escalation
HighCVE-2025-8841: Unrestricted Upload in zlt2000 microservices-platform
MediumCVE-2025-8840: Improper Authorization in jshERP
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis are available only with a Pro account. Contact root@offseq.com for access.
External Links
Need enhanced features?
Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.