CVE-2023-7192VulnerabilityPublished 2 Jan 2024Updated 20 Nov 2025

CVE-2023-7192: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.2 Advanced Update Support · Memory Leak

Affects Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.2 Advanced Update SupportSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 5.5 Medium.

Data as of 25 Oct 2026, 19:02 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

5.5Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.2% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 22% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Attack Vector: Local
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: None
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality: None
Integrity: None
Availability: High

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Local: The vulnerable component is not bound to the network stack and the attacker’s path is via read/write/execute capabilities. Either: the attacker exploits the vulnerability by accessing the target system locally (e.g., keyboard, console), or remotely (e.g., SSH); or the attacker relies on User Interaction by another person to perform actions required to exploit the vulnerability (e.g., tricking a legitimate user into opening a malicious document).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker is authorized with (i.e., requires) privileges that provide basic user capabilities that could normally affect only settings and files owned by a user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges may have the ability to cause an impact only to non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without any interaction from any user.
Scope: Unchanged: An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
Confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the impacted component.
Integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the impacted component.
Availability: High: There is total loss of availability, resulting in the attacker being able to fully deny access to resources in the impacted component; this loss is either sustained (while the attacker continues to deliver the attack) or persistent (the condition persists even after the attack has completed). Alternatively, the attacker has the ability to deny some availability, but the loss of availability presents a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component (e.g., the attacker cannot disrupt existing connections, but can prevent new connections; the attacker can repeatedly exploit a vulnerability that, in each instance of a successful attack, leaks a only small amount of memory, but after repeated exploitation causes a service to become completely unavailable).

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 2 Jan 2024
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-25.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

AI-suggested

To mitigate CVE-2023-7192, organizations should: 1) Monitor Red Hat advisories closely and apply kernel patches or updates as soon as they become available for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.2 Advanced Update Support. 2) Restrict CAP_NET_ADMIN privileges strictly to trusted administrators and service accounts, minimizing the attack surface. 3) Implement robust access controls and auditing to detect unauthorized privilege escalations or suspicious local activity. 4) Employ system resource monitoring tools to detect abnormal memory usage patterns indicative of exploitation attempts. 5) Consider deploying kernel hardening features or security modules that limit the impact of local privilege misuse. 6) In environments where patching is delayed, isolate vulnerable systems or restrict local administrative access to reduce risk. 7) Conduct regular security training to raise awareness about the risks of privilege misuse. These measures, combined with timely patching, will reduce the likelihood and impact of exploitation.

Description

A memory leak problem was found in ctnetlink_create_conntrack in net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c in the Linux Kernel. This issue may allow a local attacker with CAP_NET_ADMIN privileges to cause a denial of service (DoS) attack due to a refcount overflow.

Impact

For European organizations, the primary impact of CVE-2023-7192 is the potential for denial of service conditions on systems running Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.2 Advanced Update Support. This could disrupt critical services, especially in environments relying on stable network filtering and connection tracking, such as data centers, cloud providers, telecom infrastructure, and industrial control systems. Although exploitation requires local CAP_NET_ADMIN privileges, insider threats or compromised administrative accounts could leverage this vulnerability to degrade system availability. The lack of confidentiality or integrity impact reduces the risk of data breaches but does not diminish the operational risks associated with service outages. Organizations with high availability requirements or those operating critical infrastructure may face significant operational and reputational damage if affected systems become unstable or crash. The absence of known exploits in the wild currently lowers immediate risk but does not eliminate the need for proactive mitigation.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 20 Nov 2025, 19:00 UTC

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats