CVE-2024-0567: Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
A vulnerability was found in GnuTLS, where a cockpit (which uses gnuTLS) rejects a certificate chain with distributed trust. This issue occurs when validating a certificate chain with cockpit-certificate-ensure. This flaw allows an unauthenticated, remote client or attacker to initiate a denial of service attack.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2024-0567 is a vulnerability identified in GnuTLS version 3.8.0, specifically impacting the cockpit system management tool that leverages GnuTLS for cryptographic operations. The issue stems from improper verification of cryptographic signatures during the validation of certificate chains that involve distributed trust models. The vulnerability manifests when cockpit-certificate-ensure attempts to validate such certificate chains and erroneously rejects them, leading to denial of service conditions. This flaw allows an unauthenticated, remote attacker to initiate a DoS attack without requiring any privileges or user interaction. The vulnerability does not compromise confidentiality or integrity but directly impacts availability by disrupting certificate validation processes critical for secure communications and system management. The CVSS v3.1 score of 7.5 reflects the high severity due to network attack vector, low attack complexity, no privileges required, and no user interaction needed. Although no exploits have been reported in the wild, the ease of exploitation and the critical role of certificate validation in secure system operations make this a significant threat. The vulnerability affects GnuTLS 3.8.0 and related cockpit components, commonly deployed in Linux environments for server and infrastructure management. Proper validation of certificate chains is essential to maintain trust and secure communications; failure to do so can halt system management operations and potentially impact dependent services.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, especially those operating critical infrastructure, cloud services, or enterprise Linux environments, this vulnerability poses a risk of service disruption due to denial of service attacks targeting certificate validation processes. Systems using cockpit and GnuTLS for secure communications or remote management could experience outages or degraded functionality, impacting operational continuity. This is particularly concerning for sectors such as finance, healthcare, telecommunications, and government services where availability is crucial. The lack of confidentiality or integrity compromise reduces the risk of data breaches but does not mitigate the operational impact. The ease of remote exploitation without authentication increases the threat surface, potentially allowing attackers to disrupt multiple systems simultaneously. Organizations relying on distributed trust models for certificate chains may be disproportionately affected due to the specific nature of the flaw. The absence of known exploits in the wild provides a window for proactive mitigation, but the high CVSS score indicates urgency in addressing the vulnerability to prevent potential attacks.
Mitigation Recommendations
European organizations should prioritize updating GnuTLS and cockpit components to patched versions once they are released by vendors. Until patches are available, administrators should consider disabling or restricting the use of cockpit-certificate-ensure for certificate chain validation involving distributed trust or implement strict network controls to limit access to affected services. Monitoring network traffic for unusual certificate validation failures or service disruptions can help detect exploitation attempts. Employing application-layer firewalls or intrusion prevention systems to block suspicious traffic targeting cockpit services is advisable. Organizations should also review their certificate management policies to minimize reliance on distributed trust chains where feasible. Regularly auditing and validating certificate chains manually or with alternative trusted tools can serve as a temporary workaround. Coordination with Linux distribution maintainers and security teams to receive timely updates and advisories is critical. Finally, incorporating this vulnerability into incident response plans ensures readiness to respond to potential denial of service incidents.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Italy, Spain, Sweden, Poland, Belgium, Finland
CVE-2024-0567: Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
Description
A vulnerability was found in GnuTLS, where a cockpit (which uses gnuTLS) rejects a certificate chain with distributed trust. This issue occurs when validating a certificate chain with cockpit-certificate-ensure. This flaw allows an unauthenticated, remote client or attacker to initiate a denial of service attack.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-2024-0567 is a vulnerability identified in GnuTLS version 3.8.0, specifically impacting the cockpit system management tool that leverages GnuTLS for cryptographic operations. The issue stems from improper verification of cryptographic signatures during the validation of certificate chains that involve distributed trust models. The vulnerability manifests when cockpit-certificate-ensure attempts to validate such certificate chains and erroneously rejects them, leading to denial of service conditions. This flaw allows an unauthenticated, remote attacker to initiate a DoS attack without requiring any privileges or user interaction. The vulnerability does not compromise confidentiality or integrity but directly impacts availability by disrupting certificate validation processes critical for secure communications and system management. The CVSS v3.1 score of 7.5 reflects the high severity due to network attack vector, low attack complexity, no privileges required, and no user interaction needed. Although no exploits have been reported in the wild, the ease of exploitation and the critical role of certificate validation in secure system operations make this a significant threat. The vulnerability affects GnuTLS 3.8.0 and related cockpit components, commonly deployed in Linux environments for server and infrastructure management. Proper validation of certificate chains is essential to maintain trust and secure communications; failure to do so can halt system management operations and potentially impact dependent services.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, especially those operating critical infrastructure, cloud services, or enterprise Linux environments, this vulnerability poses a risk of service disruption due to denial of service attacks targeting certificate validation processes. Systems using cockpit and GnuTLS for secure communications or remote management could experience outages or degraded functionality, impacting operational continuity. This is particularly concerning for sectors such as finance, healthcare, telecommunications, and government services where availability is crucial. The lack of confidentiality or integrity compromise reduces the risk of data breaches but does not mitigate the operational impact. The ease of remote exploitation without authentication increases the threat surface, potentially allowing attackers to disrupt multiple systems simultaneously. Organizations relying on distributed trust models for certificate chains may be disproportionately affected due to the specific nature of the flaw. The absence of known exploits in the wild provides a window for proactive mitigation, but the high CVSS score indicates urgency in addressing the vulnerability to prevent potential attacks.
Mitigation Recommendations
European organizations should prioritize updating GnuTLS and cockpit components to patched versions once they are released by vendors. Until patches are available, administrators should consider disabling or restricting the use of cockpit-certificate-ensure for certificate chain validation involving distributed trust or implement strict network controls to limit access to affected services. Monitoring network traffic for unusual certificate validation failures or service disruptions can help detect exploitation attempts. Employing application-layer firewalls or intrusion prevention systems to block suspicious traffic targeting cockpit services is advisable. Organizations should also review their certificate management policies to minimize reliance on distributed trust chains where feasible. Regularly auditing and validating certificate chains manually or with alternative trusted tools can serve as a temporary workaround. Coordination with Linux distribution maintainers and security teams to receive timely updates and advisories is critical. Finally, incorporating this vulnerability into incident response plans ensures readiness to respond to potential denial of service incidents.
For access to advanced analysis and higher rate limits, contact root@offseq.com
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.1
- Assigner Short Name
- redhat
- Date Reserved
- 2024-01-16T04:02:22.392Z
- Cvss Version
- 3.1
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 683dc31f182aa0cae24a050f
Added to database: 6/2/2025, 3:28:31 PM
Last enriched: 11/20/2025, 7:00:58 PM
Last updated: 12/3/2025, 6:50:15 PM
Views: 42
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
CVE-2025-66478
LowCVE-2025-64763: CWE-693: Protection Mechanism Failure in envoyproxy envoy
LowCVE-2025-64527: CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference in envoyproxy envoy
MediumCVE-2025-66208: CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') in CollaboraOnline online
HighCVE-2025-66032: CWE-77: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command ('Command Injection') in anthropics claude-code
HighActions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
Need enhanced features?
Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.