VulnerabilityPublished 29 Jan 2024Updated 29 May 2025

CVE-2024-1006: Shanxi Diankeyun Technology NODERP · Improper Authentication

Affects Shanxi Diankeyun Technology NODERPSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 7.3 High.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 14:05 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

7.3High

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.7% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 53% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality: Low
Integrity: Low
Availability: Low

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without any interaction from any user.
Scope: Unchanged: An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
Confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the impacted component.
Integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact on the impacted component.
Availability: Low: Performance is reduced or there are interruptions in resource availability. Even if repeated exploitation of the vulnerability is possible, the attacker does not have the ability to completely deny service to legitimate users. The resources in the impacted component are either partially available all of the time, or fully available only some of the time, but overall there is no direct, serious consequence to the impacted component.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 29 Jan 2024
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
Shanxi Diankeyun Technology NODERP	Affected =6.0.0 =6.0.1 =6.0.2	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

Since no official patches are currently available, European organizations should implement the following specific mitigations: 1) Conduct an immediate inventory to identify all instances of NODERP versions 6.0.0 to 6.0.2 in their environment. 2) Restrict network access to the NODERP application, limiting it to trusted internal networks or VPNs to reduce exposure to remote attackers. 3) Implement Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) with custom rules to detect and block suspicious manipulations of the Nod_User_Id and Nod_User_Token parameters. 4) Monitor application logs for anomalous authentication attempts or unusual parameter values indicative of exploitation attempts. 5) Employ multi-factor authentication (MFA) at the network or application gateway level to add an additional authentication barrier. 6) If feasible, isolate NODERP instances in segmented network zones to contain potential breaches. 7) Engage with Shanxi Diankeyun Technology for updates and patches, and prepare to apply them immediately upon release. 8) Consider temporary alternative ERP solutions or manual controls if the risk is unacceptable and patching is delayed.

Description

A vulnerability was found in Shanxi Diankeyun Technology NODERP up to 6.0.2 and classified as critical. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file application/index/common.php of the component Cookie Handler. The manipulation of the argument Nod_User_Id/Nod_User_Token leads to improper authentication. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The associated identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-252275. NOTE: The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Impact

For European organizations using NODERP versions 6.0.0 through 6.0.2, this vulnerability poses a significant risk. Unauthorized access through improper authentication can lead to data breaches, unauthorized transactions, or manipulation of business-critical processes managed by NODERP. Given that NODERP is an enterprise resource planning (ERP) system, attackers could access sensitive corporate data, disrupt operations, or escalate privileges within the affected environment. This could result in financial losses, reputational damage, and regulatory compliance violations, especially under GDPR, where unauthorized access to personal data must be reported and mitigated promptly. The remote exploitability without authentication or user interaction increases the urgency for European organizations to assess their exposure and implement mitigations. The lack of vendor response and patches further exacerbates the risk, requiring organizations to consider compensating controls.

CWE-287Improper Authentication (opens in a new tab)
Class weaknessLikelihood of exploit: HighOWASP Top 10 A07:2025: Authentication Failures (opens in a new tab)
When an actor claims to have a given identity, the product does not prove or insufficiently proves that the claim is correct.
MITRE discourages mapping vulnerabilities to this broad entry; the root cause is usually a more specific weakness.
Architecture and Design · Libraries or Frameworks
Use an authentication framework or library such as the OWASP ESAPI Authentication feature.
OWASP Cheat Sheets
OWASP Authentication (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V2.8.5 (opens in a new tab)
V2.8.4 (opens in a new tab)
V9.2.3 (opens in a new tab)
Attack patterns
Fake the Source of Data (opens in a new tab)
Utilizing REST's Trust in the System Resource to Obtain Sensitive Data (opens in a new tab)
Session Hijacking (opens in a new tab)
Token Impersonation (opens in a new tab)
Upload a Web Shell to a Web Server (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 8 Jul 2025, 01:25 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-287

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats