CVE-2024-1021VulnerabilityPublished 29 Jan 2024Updated 6 Jun 2025

CVE-2024-1021: Rebuild · Server-Side Request Forgery

Affects RebuildSource CVE Database V5

Exposed hosts seen by OffSeq Mirage · public detection template (Nuclei) · 34% EPSS · CVSS 6.3 Medium.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 06:26 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

6.3Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 34.7% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 98% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: None
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality: Low
Integrity: Low
Availability: Low

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker is authorized with (i.e., requires) privileges that provide basic user capabilities that could normally affect only settings and files owned by a user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges may have the ability to cause an impact only to non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without any interaction from any user.
Scope: Unchanged: An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
Confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the impacted component.
Integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact on the impacted component.
Availability: Low: Performance is reduced or there are interruptions in resource availability. Even if repeated exploitation of the vulnerability is possible, the attacker does not have the ability to completely deny service to legitimate users. The resources in the impacted component are either partially available all of the time, or fully available only some of the time, but overall there is no direct, serious consequence to the impacted component.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 29 Jan 2024
Detectable: evidence found.
nuclei template: Rebuild <= 3.5.5 - Server-Side Request Forgery
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: evidence found.
1 exposed host found; no attack traffic recorded

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), OffSeq Mirage (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-26.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
n/a Rebuild	Affected =3.5.0 =3.5.1 =3.5.2 =3.5.3 =3.5.4 =3.5.5	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

To mitigate CVE-2024-1021 effectively, European organizations should: 1) Immediately identify and inventory all instances of Rebuild software in use, focusing on versions 3.5.0 through 3.5.5. 3) Implement strict input validation and sanitization on the 'url' parameter within the HTTP Request Handler to prevent malicious URL injection. 4) Employ network segmentation to restrict the Rebuild server's ability to initiate outbound requests to sensitive internal resources or cloud metadata endpoints. 5) Use web application firewalls (WAFs) with rules designed to detect and block SSRF attack patterns targeting the affected endpoints. 6) Monitor logs for unusual outbound requests originating from the Rebuild server, especially to internal IP ranges or unexpected external domains. 7) Conduct regular security assessments and penetration testing focusing on SSRF vectors to identify residual risks. 8) Educate development and operations teams about SSRF risks and secure coding practices to prevent similar vulnerabilities in the future.

Description

A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, has been found in Rebuild up to 3.5.5. Affected by this issue is the function readRawText of the component HTTP Request Handler. The manipulation of the argument url leads to server-side request forgery. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. VDB-252290 is the identifier assigned to this vulnerability.

Impact

For European organizations using Rebuild versions 3.5.0 through 3.5.5, this SSRF vulnerability poses a significant risk to internal network security. An attacker exploiting this flaw could gain unauthorized access to internal resources, including sensitive databases, internal APIs, or cloud metadata services, potentially leading to data leakage or further compromise. The medium CVSS score indicates moderate impact; however, the actual damage depends on the internal network segmentation and the sensitivity of accessible resources. In sectors such as finance, healthcare, and critical infrastructure—common in Europe—such unauthorized access could lead to regulatory breaches under GDPR and other compliance frameworks, resulting in legal and financial consequences. Additionally, SSRF vulnerabilities can be a stepping stone for lateral movement or privilege escalation within an organization's network, increasing the overall threat landscape. The remote exploitability and lack of user interaction required make this vulnerability particularly dangerous in exposed environments.

CWE-918Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) (opens in a new tab)
Base weaknessCWE Top 25 (2025): #22OWASP Top 10 A01:2025: Broken Access Control (opens in a new tab)
The web server receives a URL or similar request from an upstream component and retrieves the contents of this URL, but it does not sufficiently ensure that the request is being sent to the expected destination.
OWASP Cheat Sheets
Server Side Request Forgery Prevention (opens in a new tab)
Unvalidated Redirects and Forwards (opens in a new tab)
Cross Site Scripting Prevention (opens in a new tab)
DOM based XSS Prevention (opens in a new tab)
Authorization (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V12.6.1 (opens in a new tab)
V5.2.6 (opens in a new tab)
Attack patterns
Server Side Request Forgery (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 8 Jul 2025, 12:13 UTC

Public exploits and detectiona Nuclei detection template

WeaknessesCWE-918

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats