VulnerabilityPublished 26 Jan 2025Updated 3 Apr 2025

CVE-2024-10628: Quiz Maker Business (WordPress plugin) · SQL Injection

Affects Quiz Maker Business (WordPress plugin)Source CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 7.5 High.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 15:59 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

7.5High

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.8% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 57% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality: High
Integrity: None
Availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without any interaction from any user.
Scope: Unchanged: An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
Confidentiality: High: There is total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all resources within the impacted component being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact.
Integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the impacted component.
Availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 26 Jan 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
AYS Pro Plugins Quiz Maker Business	Affected =7.0.0	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

Organizations should immediately verify the installed versions of the AYS Pro Plugins Quiz Maker Business, Developer, and Agency plugins and upgrade to versions beyond 8.8.0 (Business), 21.8.0 (Developer), or 31.8.0 (Agency) where the vulnerability is patched. If updates are not yet available, consider temporarily disabling the affected plugins or restricting access to the vulnerable endpoints via web application firewalls (WAFs) with custom rules blocking suspicious 'id' parameter inputs. Employ input validation and sanitization at the application level to reject unexpected characters in parameters. Monitor web server logs for unusual query patterns indicative of SQL injection attempts. Implement database user permissions with least privilege to limit data exposure in case of exploitation. Regularly audit and scan WordPress sites using security plugins that detect SQL injection vulnerabilities. Educate site administrators about the shared plugin slug issue to avoid false positives and ensure proper patch verification. Finally, maintain regular backups to enable recovery if a breach occurs.

Description

The Quiz Maker Business, Developer, and Agency plugins for WordPress is vulnerable to SQL Injection via the ‘id’ parameter in all versions up to, and including, 8.8.0 (Business), up to, and including, 21.8.0 (Developer), and up to, and including, 31.8.0 (Agency) due to insufficient escaping on the user supplied parameter and lack of sufficient preparation on the existing SQL query. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to append additional SQL queries into already existing queries that can be used to extract sensitive information from the database. NOTE: The three variations of this software (Business, Developer, and Agency) share the same plugin slug, so you may get an alert even if you are running the latest version of any of the pieces of software. In these cases it is safe to dismiss the notice once you've confirmed your site is on a patched version of the applicable software.

Impact

The primary impact of this vulnerability is unauthorized disclosure of sensitive information from the affected WordPress site's database. Attackers can extract data such as user credentials, personal information, or other confidential content stored in the database. This can lead to privacy violations, data breaches, and potential compliance issues for organizations. Since the vulnerability is exploitable without authentication or user interaction, it increases the attack surface significantly, allowing automated exploitation at scale. The integrity and availability of the system are not directly affected, but the loss of confidentiality can damage organizational reputation and trust. Organizations relying on these plugins for quiz or survey functionality may face targeted attacks, especially if they store sensitive user data. The widespread use of WordPress globally means that many small to medium businesses, educational institutions, and enterprises could be impacted. The lack of known exploits in the wild currently provides a window for remediation before active attacks emerge.

Summary

CVE-2024-10628 identifies a SQL Injection vulnerability in the AYS Pro Plugins Quiz Maker Business, Developer, and Agency WordPress plugins. The vulnerability exists due to insufficient escaping and lack of prepared statements for the 'id' parameter in SQL queries, allowing attackers to append arbitrary SQL commands. This flaw affects all versions up to 8.8.0 for Business, 21.8.0 for Developer, and 31.8.0 for Agency plugins. An unauthenticated attacker can exploit this remotely by sending crafted requests that manipulate the SQL query logic, enabling unauthorized access to sensitive data stored in the backend database. The vulnerability does not require authentication or user interaction, increasing its risk profile. Despite no known active exploitation, the vulnerability's presence in widely used WordPress plugins poses a significant threat. The shared plugin slug across the three plugin variants may trigger alerts even on patched versions, necessitating careful version verification. The CVSS 3.1 score of 7.5 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N) indicates a high-severity issue with a network attack vector, low attack complexity, no privileges or user interaction required, and a high impact on confidentiality but no impact on integrity or availability.

CWE-89Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') (opens in a new tab)
Base weaknessLikelihood of exploit: HighCWE Top 25 (2025): #2OWASP Top 10 A05:2025: Injection (opens in a new tab)
The product constructs all or part of an SQL command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended SQL command when it is sent to a downstream component. Without sufficient removal or quoting of SQL syntax in user-controllable inputs, the generated SQL query can cause those inputs to be interpreted as SQL instead of ordinary user data.
Architecture and Design · Libraries or Frameworks
Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
Architecture and Design · Parameterization
If available, use structured mechanisms that automatically enforce the separation between data and code. These mechanisms may be able to provide the relevant quoting, encoding, and validation automatically, instead of relying on the developer to provide this capability at every point where output is generated.
Architecture and Design · Operation · Environment Hardening
Run your code using the lowest privileges that are required to accomplish the necessary tasks. If possible, create isolated accounts with limited privileges that are only used for a single task. That way, a successful attack will not immediately give the attacker access to the rest of the software or its environment.
OWASP Cheat Sheets
Query Parameterization (opens in a new tab)
Unvalidated Redirects and Forwards (opens in a new tab)
XML Security (opens in a new tab)
XML External Entity Prevention (opens in a new tab)
File Upload (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V5.3.4 (opens in a new tab)
V5.3.5 (opens in a new tab)
V1.5.1 (opens in a new tab)
Attack patterns
Command Line Execution through SQL Injection (opens in a new tab)
Object Relational Mapping Injection (opens in a new tab)
SQL Injection through SOAP Parameter Tampering (opens in a new tab)
Expanding Control over the Operating System from the Database (opens in a new tab)
SQL Injection (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 26 Feb 2026, 09:26 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-89

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats