CVE-2024-10977: Use of Less Trusted Source in PostgreSQL
Client use of server error message in PostgreSQL allows a server not trusted under current SSL or GSS settings to furnish arbitrary non-NUL bytes to the libpq application. For example, a man-in-the-middle attacker could send a long error message that a human or screen-scraper user of psql mistakes for valid query results. This is probably not a concern for clients where the user interface unambiguously indicates the boundary between one error message and other text. Versions before PostgreSQL 17.1, 16.5, 15.9, 14.14, 13.17, and 12.21 are affected.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2024-10977 is a vulnerability in PostgreSQL where the client library libpq can be misled by server error messages if the server is not fully trusted under current SSL or GSSAPI authentication settings. Specifically, a malicious or man-in-the-middle attacker can send crafted error messages containing arbitrary non-NUL bytes. These bytes can be interpreted by libpq clients, such as the psql command-line tool, as legitimate query results rather than error messages. This occurs because some client interfaces do not clearly demarcate error message boundaries from query output, potentially causing users or automated screen-scrapers to misinterpret error data as valid information. The vulnerability affects PostgreSQL versions before 17.1, 16.5, 15.9, 14.14, 13.17, and 12.21. The attack vector requires network access (AV:N), has high complexity (AC:H), does not require privileges (PR:N), but does require user interaction (UI:R). The impact is limited to integrity, as it can cause incorrect data interpretation but does not expose confidential data or cause denial of service. No known exploits have been reported in the wild, and PostgreSQL maintainers have released patches in the specified versions to address this issue.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the primary impact of CVE-2024-10977 is the potential for data integrity issues where error messages might be misinterpreted as valid query results. This could lead to incorrect decision-making or automated processes acting on false data, especially in environments where database query results are consumed by scripts or screen-scrapers without robust error handling. While confidentiality and availability are not directly affected, the integrity compromise could have downstream effects in sectors relying heavily on accurate database outputs, such as finance, healthcare, and critical infrastructure. The requirement for a man-in-the-middle position and user interaction limits the likelihood of widespread exploitation, but organizations with less secure network configurations or insufficient client-side validation are at higher risk. The absence of known exploits reduces immediate threat levels but does not eliminate future risk.
Mitigation Recommendations
European organizations should promptly upgrade PostgreSQL installations to the fixed versions: 17.1, 16.5, 15.9, 14.14, 13.17, or 12.21. Network security should be enhanced to prevent man-in-the-middle attacks, including enforcing strict SSL/TLS configurations and validating server certificates rigorously. Client applications using libpq should be audited to ensure they clearly distinguish error messages from query results, possibly by updating client software or adding explicit parsing logic. Implementing network segmentation and monitoring for unusual error message patterns can help detect attempted exploitation. Additionally, educating users and administrators about the risks of interpreting error messages as valid data can reduce the impact of potential attacks. Regular vulnerability scanning and patch management processes should be enforced to maintain updated PostgreSQL versions.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Sweden, Finland, Norway, Italy, Spain, Poland
CVE-2024-10977: Use of Less Trusted Source in PostgreSQL
Description
Client use of server error message in PostgreSQL allows a server not trusted under current SSL or GSS settings to furnish arbitrary non-NUL bytes to the libpq application. For example, a man-in-the-middle attacker could send a long error message that a human or screen-scraper user of psql mistakes for valid query results. This is probably not a concern for clients where the user interface unambiguously indicates the boundary between one error message and other text. Versions before PostgreSQL 17.1, 16.5, 15.9, 14.14, 13.17, and 12.21 are affected.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-2024-10977 is a vulnerability in PostgreSQL where the client library libpq can be misled by server error messages if the server is not fully trusted under current SSL or GSSAPI authentication settings. Specifically, a malicious or man-in-the-middle attacker can send crafted error messages containing arbitrary non-NUL bytes. These bytes can be interpreted by libpq clients, such as the psql command-line tool, as legitimate query results rather than error messages. This occurs because some client interfaces do not clearly demarcate error message boundaries from query output, potentially causing users or automated screen-scrapers to misinterpret error data as valid information. The vulnerability affects PostgreSQL versions before 17.1, 16.5, 15.9, 14.14, 13.17, and 12.21. The attack vector requires network access (AV:N), has high complexity (AC:H), does not require privileges (PR:N), but does require user interaction (UI:R). The impact is limited to integrity, as it can cause incorrect data interpretation but does not expose confidential data or cause denial of service. No known exploits have been reported in the wild, and PostgreSQL maintainers have released patches in the specified versions to address this issue.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the primary impact of CVE-2024-10977 is the potential for data integrity issues where error messages might be misinterpreted as valid query results. This could lead to incorrect decision-making or automated processes acting on false data, especially in environments where database query results are consumed by scripts or screen-scrapers without robust error handling. While confidentiality and availability are not directly affected, the integrity compromise could have downstream effects in sectors relying heavily on accurate database outputs, such as finance, healthcare, and critical infrastructure. The requirement for a man-in-the-middle position and user interaction limits the likelihood of widespread exploitation, but organizations with less secure network configurations or insufficient client-side validation are at higher risk. The absence of known exploits reduces immediate threat levels but does not eliminate future risk.
Mitigation Recommendations
European organizations should promptly upgrade PostgreSQL installations to the fixed versions: 17.1, 16.5, 15.9, 14.14, 13.17, or 12.21. Network security should be enhanced to prevent man-in-the-middle attacks, including enforcing strict SSL/TLS configurations and validating server certificates rigorously. Client applications using libpq should be audited to ensure they clearly distinguish error messages from query results, possibly by updating client software or adding explicit parsing logic. Implementing network segmentation and monitoring for unusual error message patterns can help detect attempted exploitation. Additionally, educating users and administrators about the risks of interpreting error messages as valid data can reduce the impact of potential attacks. Regular vulnerability scanning and patch management processes should be enforced to maintain updated PostgreSQL versions.
For access to advanced analysis and higher rate limits, contact root@offseq.com
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.2
- Assigner Short Name
- PostgreSQL
- Date Reserved
- 2024-11-07T19:27:03.261Z
- Cvss Version
- 3.1
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 69092615fe7723195e0b358d
Added to database: 11/3/2025, 10:00:53 PM
Last enriched: 11/3/2025, 11:15:21 PM
Last updated: 11/5/2025, 1:34:21 PM
Views: 1
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
CVE-2025-12497: CWE-98 Improper Control of Filename for Include/Require Statement in PHP Program ('PHP Remote File Inclusion') in averta Premium Portfolio Features for Phlox theme
HighCVE-2025-11745: CWE-80 Improper Neutralization of Script-Related HTML Tags in a Web Page (Basic XSS) in spacetime Ad Inserter – Ad Manager & AdSense Ads
MediumCVE-2025-58337: CWE-284 Improper Access Control in Apache Software Foundation Apache Doris-MCP-Server
UnknownCVE-2025-12469: CWE-862 Missing Authorization in amans2k FunnelKit Automations – Email Marketing Automation and CRM for WordPress & WooCommerce
MediumCVE-2025-12468: CWE-200 Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor in amans2k FunnelKit Automations – Email Marketing Automation and CRM for WordPress & WooCommerce
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
Need enhanced features?
Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.