CVE-2024-2467VulnerabilityPublished 25 Apr 2024Updated 25 Feb 2026

CVE-2024-2467: Timing Side Channel

Source CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 5.9 Medium.

Data as of 25 Oct 2026, 19:02 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

5.9Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.5% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 43% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: High
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality: High
Integrity: None
Availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: High: A successful attack depends on conditions beyond the attacker's control. That is, a successful attack cannot be accomplished at will, but requires the attacker to invest in some measurable amount of effort in preparation or execution against the vulnerable component before a successful attack can be expected. For example, a successful attack may require an attacker to: gather knowledge about the environment in which the vulnerable target/component exists; prepare the target environment to improve exploit reliability; or inject themselves into the logical network path between the target and the resource requested by the victim in order to read and/or modify network communications (e.g., a man in the middle attack).
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without any interaction from any user.
Scope: Unchanged: An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
Confidentiality: High: There is total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all resources within the impacted component being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact.
Integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the impacted component.
Availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 25 Apr 2024
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-25.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

AI-suggested

To mitigate CVE-2024-2467, organizations should: 1) Transition away from the legacy PKCS#1 v1.5 RSA padding mode to more secure alternatives such as RSA-OAEP, which is resistant to Bleichenbacher-style attacks. 2) Update or patch the perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-RSA package to versions that address this timing side-channel vulnerability once available. 3) Implement network-level protections such as rate limiting and anomaly detection to reduce the feasibility of sending large volumes of trial ciphertexts. 4) Employ constant-time cryptographic operations to minimize timing discrepancies observable by attackers. 5) Restrict access to cryptographic decryption services to trusted networks or authenticated users to reduce exposure. 6) Monitor cryptographic service logs for unusual patterns indicative of adaptive chosen ciphertext attacks. 7) Educate developers and system administrators about the risks of legacy padding schemes and encourage the adoption of modern cryptographic best practices.

Description

A timing-based side-channel flaw exists in the perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-RSA package, which could be sufficient to recover plaintext across a network in a Bleichenbacher-style attack. To achieve successful decryption, an attacker would have to be able to send a large number of trial messages. The vulnerability affects the legacy PKCS#1v1.5 RSA encryption padding mode.

Impact

The primary impact of CVE-2024-2467 is the potential compromise of confidentiality through plaintext recovery in systems using the vulnerable perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-RSA package with PKCS#1 v1.5 padding. Organizations that rely on this legacy padding mode for RSA encryption may expose sensitive data to remote attackers capable of performing timing measurements over the network. This could lead to leakage of cryptographic secrets, user credentials, or other confidential information. Although the attack does not affect data integrity or availability, the breach of confidentiality can have severe consequences, including unauthorized data disclosure, regulatory non-compliance, and reputational damage. The requirement for a large number of trial messages and high precision timing measurements limits the feasibility of the attack in noisy or restricted network environments, but targeted attackers with sufficient resources could still exploit this vulnerability. Systems that have not transitioned to more secure padding schemes or that expose RSA decryption services over the network are at elevated risk.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…