CVE-2024-30052: CWE-693: Protection Mechanism Failure in Microsoft Microsoft Visual Studio 2017 version 15.9 (includes 15.0 - 15.8)
Visual Studio Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2024-30052 is a vulnerability identified in Microsoft Visual Studio 2017 versions 15.0 through 15.9.0, categorized under CWE-693, which relates to protection mechanism failure. This vulnerability allows remote code execution (RCE) due to inadequate enforcement of security controls within the Visual Studio environment. The attack vector is local (AV:L), meaning an attacker must have local access to the system to exploit the flaw. The attack complexity is high (AC:H), indicating that exploitation requires specific conditions or knowledge, and no privileges are required (PR:N). However, user interaction is necessary (UI:R), such as opening a malicious project or file. The scope is unchanged (S:U), so the impact is limited to the vulnerable component. The vulnerability does not compromise confidentiality (C:N) or availability (A:N) but has a high impact on integrity (I:H), allowing an attacker to execute arbitrary code, potentially altering or injecting malicious code into the development environment. No known exploits have been reported in the wild, and no official patches have been released at the time of publication. The vulnerability was reserved in March 2024 and published in June 2024. The lack of patches means organizations must rely on mitigations until updates are available. This vulnerability poses a risk primarily to developers and organizations relying on Visual Studio 2017 for software development, as it could lead to compromised build environments and insertion of malicious code into software projects.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, this vulnerability could undermine the integrity of software development processes, potentially leading to the insertion of malicious code into applications before deployment. This risk is particularly critical for sectors with high reliance on custom software development, such as finance, manufacturing, and technology. The requirement for local access and user interaction limits the attack surface but does not eliminate risk, especially in environments where multiple users share development machines or where endpoint security is lax. Compromise of development environments could lead to downstream supply chain attacks, affecting not only the initial organization but also their clients and partners. The absence of confidentiality and availability impacts reduces the risk of data leakage or service disruption, but the integrity impact alone is significant for trust in software products. European organizations with legacy development environments still using Visual Studio 2017 are most at risk, especially if they have not upgraded to newer, patched versions. The lack of known exploits in the wild currently reduces immediate threat but should not lead to complacency.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Restrict local access to development machines running Visual Studio 2017 to trusted personnel only, using strict access controls and endpoint security solutions. 2. Enforce the principle of least privilege for users on development systems to minimize the risk of unauthorized code execution. 3. Educate developers about the risks of opening untrusted projects or files and implement policies to verify the integrity of source code and project files before use. 4. Monitor development environments for unusual activity, such as unexpected process launches or code changes, using endpoint detection and response (EDR) tools. 5. Isolate development environments from general user workstations and network segments to reduce lateral movement opportunities. 6. Plan and prioritize upgrading to supported versions of Visual Studio that have addressed this vulnerability once patches are released. 7. Implement application whitelisting to prevent execution of unauthorized binaries within development environments. 8. Regularly back up source code repositories and development configurations to enable recovery in case of compromise. 9. Coordinate with Microsoft support channels for updates and advisories related to this vulnerability.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Sweden, Finland, Ireland
CVE-2024-30052: CWE-693: Protection Mechanism Failure in Microsoft Microsoft Visual Studio 2017 version 15.9 (includes 15.0 - 15.8)
Description
Visual Studio Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-2024-30052 is a vulnerability identified in Microsoft Visual Studio 2017 versions 15.0 through 15.9.0, categorized under CWE-693, which relates to protection mechanism failure. This vulnerability allows remote code execution (RCE) due to inadequate enforcement of security controls within the Visual Studio environment. The attack vector is local (AV:L), meaning an attacker must have local access to the system to exploit the flaw. The attack complexity is high (AC:H), indicating that exploitation requires specific conditions or knowledge, and no privileges are required (PR:N). However, user interaction is necessary (UI:R), such as opening a malicious project or file. The scope is unchanged (S:U), so the impact is limited to the vulnerable component. The vulnerability does not compromise confidentiality (C:N) or availability (A:N) but has a high impact on integrity (I:H), allowing an attacker to execute arbitrary code, potentially altering or injecting malicious code into the development environment. No known exploits have been reported in the wild, and no official patches have been released at the time of publication. The vulnerability was reserved in March 2024 and published in June 2024. The lack of patches means organizations must rely on mitigations until updates are available. This vulnerability poses a risk primarily to developers and organizations relying on Visual Studio 2017 for software development, as it could lead to compromised build environments and insertion of malicious code into software projects.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, this vulnerability could undermine the integrity of software development processes, potentially leading to the insertion of malicious code into applications before deployment. This risk is particularly critical for sectors with high reliance on custom software development, such as finance, manufacturing, and technology. The requirement for local access and user interaction limits the attack surface but does not eliminate risk, especially in environments where multiple users share development machines or where endpoint security is lax. Compromise of development environments could lead to downstream supply chain attacks, affecting not only the initial organization but also their clients and partners. The absence of confidentiality and availability impacts reduces the risk of data leakage or service disruption, but the integrity impact alone is significant for trust in software products. European organizations with legacy development environments still using Visual Studio 2017 are most at risk, especially if they have not upgraded to newer, patched versions. The lack of known exploits in the wild currently reduces immediate threat but should not lead to complacency.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Restrict local access to development machines running Visual Studio 2017 to trusted personnel only, using strict access controls and endpoint security solutions. 2. Enforce the principle of least privilege for users on development systems to minimize the risk of unauthorized code execution. 3. Educate developers about the risks of opening untrusted projects or files and implement policies to verify the integrity of source code and project files before use. 4. Monitor development environments for unusual activity, such as unexpected process launches or code changes, using endpoint detection and response (EDR) tools. 5. Isolate development environments from general user workstations and network segments to reduce lateral movement opportunities. 6. Plan and prioritize upgrading to supported versions of Visual Studio that have addressed this vulnerability once patches are released. 7. Implement application whitelisting to prevent execution of unauthorized binaries within development environments. 8. Regularly back up source code repositories and development configurations to enable recovery in case of compromise. 9. Coordinate with Microsoft support channels for updates and advisories related to this vulnerability.
Affected Countries
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.1
- Assigner Short Name
- microsoft
- Date Reserved
- 2024-03-22T23:12:13.409Z
- Cisa Enriched
- true
- Cvss Version
- 3.1
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 682cd0fa1484d88663aec0c2
Added to database: 5/20/2025, 6:59:06 PM
Last enriched: 12/17/2025, 11:32:01 PM
Last updated: 1/19/2026, 10:06:34 AM
Views: 46
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
CVE-2026-1148: Cross-Site Request Forgery in SourceCodester Patients Waiting Area Queue Management System
MediumCVE-2026-1147: Cross Site Scripting in SourceCodester Patients Waiting Area Queue Management System
Medium19th January – Threat Intelligence Report
MediumCVE-2026-1146: Cross Site Scripting in SourceCodester Patients Waiting Area Queue Management System
MediumCVE-2025-59355: CWE-532 Insertion of Sensitive Information into Log File in Apache Software Foundation Apache Linkis
UnknownActions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
External Links
Need more coverage?
Upgrade to Pro Console in Console -> Billing for AI refresh and higher limits.
For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.