CVE-2024-3019: Exposure of Resource to Wrong Sphere
A flaw was found in PCP. The default pmproxy configuration exposes the Redis server backend to the local network, allowing remote command execution with the privileges of the Redis user. This issue can only be exploited when pmproxy is running. By default, pmproxy is not running and needs to be started manually. The pmproxy service is usually started from the 'Metrics settings' page of the Cockpit web interface. This flaw affects PCP versions 4.3.4 and newer.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2024-3019 is a vulnerability identified in Performance Co-Pilot (PCP), specifically affecting versions 4.3.4 and later. PCP is a system performance monitoring suite commonly used on Linux systems. The vulnerability arises from the default configuration of the pmproxy component, which, when started, exposes the Redis server backend to the local network. Redis is used by pmproxy as a backend data store. This exposure allows an attacker on the local network to execute arbitrary commands remotely with the privileges of the Redis user, effectively enabling remote code execution. The vulnerability is contingent on pmproxy being actively running, which is not the default state; pmproxy must be manually started, usually through the 'Metrics settings' page in the Cockpit web interface. Since pmproxy is not started by default, the attack surface is limited to systems where administrators have enabled this service. The CVSS 3.1 score of 8.8 reflects the vulnerability's high impact: it can be exploited remotely over the local network without authentication or user interaction, and it compromises confidentiality, integrity, and availability. No known exploits have been reported in the wild as of the publication date. The flaw stems from an 'Exposure of Resource to Wrong Sphere,' meaning the Redis backend is accessible beyond its intended scope, violating security boundaries. This vulnerability requires immediate attention in environments where pmproxy is enabled, as it could allow attackers to gain control over system monitoring infrastructure and potentially pivot to further system compromise.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of CVE-2024-3019 can be significant, especially for those relying on PCP for system monitoring and performance management in critical infrastructure, data centers, and enterprise environments. Exploitation allows an attacker to execute arbitrary commands with Redis user privileges, potentially leading to full system compromise, data theft, or disruption of monitoring services. This could affect the confidentiality of sensitive performance data, integrity of system metrics, and availability of monitoring tools, which are vital for operational awareness and incident response. In sectors such as finance, healthcare, energy, and government, where system monitoring is crucial for compliance and security, this vulnerability could facilitate lateral movement and persistent access by threat actors. The requirement for local network access somewhat limits remote exploitation but does not eliminate risk in environments with insufficient network segmentation or where attackers have already gained foothold. The lack of known exploits in the wild provides a window for proactive mitigation, but organizations should not delay remediation due to the high severity and ease of exploitation once pmproxy is enabled.
Mitigation Recommendations
European organizations should take the following specific actions to mitigate CVE-2024-3019: 1) Audit all systems running PCP to identify if pmproxy is enabled, especially those managed via the Cockpit web interface. 2) If pmproxy is not required, disable the service to eliminate the attack vector. 3) For systems requiring pmproxy, restrict network access to the Redis backend by implementing strict firewall rules limiting access to trusted hosts only, ideally localhost or secured management networks. 4) Employ network segmentation to isolate monitoring infrastructure from general user networks to prevent unauthorized local network access. 5) Monitor logs and network traffic for unusual Redis commands or unexpected pmproxy activations. 6) Keep PCP installations updated and monitor vendor advisories for patches or configuration updates addressing this vulnerability. 7) Educate system administrators on the risks of enabling pmproxy and ensure secure configuration practices are followed. 8) Consider deploying host-based intrusion detection systems (HIDS) to detect anomalous activities related to Redis or pmproxy. These targeted mitigations go beyond generic advice by focusing on service enablement, network controls, and monitoring specific to the vulnerability context.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Sweden, Finland, Poland, Italy, Spain
CVE-2024-3019: Exposure of Resource to Wrong Sphere
Description
A flaw was found in PCP. The default pmproxy configuration exposes the Redis server backend to the local network, allowing remote command execution with the privileges of the Redis user. This issue can only be exploited when pmproxy is running. By default, pmproxy is not running and needs to be started manually. The pmproxy service is usually started from the 'Metrics settings' page of the Cockpit web interface. This flaw affects PCP versions 4.3.4 and newer.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-2024-3019 is a vulnerability identified in Performance Co-Pilot (PCP), specifically affecting versions 4.3.4 and later. PCP is a system performance monitoring suite commonly used on Linux systems. The vulnerability arises from the default configuration of the pmproxy component, which, when started, exposes the Redis server backend to the local network. Redis is used by pmproxy as a backend data store. This exposure allows an attacker on the local network to execute arbitrary commands remotely with the privileges of the Redis user, effectively enabling remote code execution. The vulnerability is contingent on pmproxy being actively running, which is not the default state; pmproxy must be manually started, usually through the 'Metrics settings' page in the Cockpit web interface. Since pmproxy is not started by default, the attack surface is limited to systems where administrators have enabled this service. The CVSS 3.1 score of 8.8 reflects the vulnerability's high impact: it can be exploited remotely over the local network without authentication or user interaction, and it compromises confidentiality, integrity, and availability. No known exploits have been reported in the wild as of the publication date. The flaw stems from an 'Exposure of Resource to Wrong Sphere,' meaning the Redis backend is accessible beyond its intended scope, violating security boundaries. This vulnerability requires immediate attention in environments where pmproxy is enabled, as it could allow attackers to gain control over system monitoring infrastructure and potentially pivot to further system compromise.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of CVE-2024-3019 can be significant, especially for those relying on PCP for system monitoring and performance management in critical infrastructure, data centers, and enterprise environments. Exploitation allows an attacker to execute arbitrary commands with Redis user privileges, potentially leading to full system compromise, data theft, or disruption of monitoring services. This could affect the confidentiality of sensitive performance data, integrity of system metrics, and availability of monitoring tools, which are vital for operational awareness and incident response. In sectors such as finance, healthcare, energy, and government, where system monitoring is crucial for compliance and security, this vulnerability could facilitate lateral movement and persistent access by threat actors. The requirement for local network access somewhat limits remote exploitation but does not eliminate risk in environments with insufficient network segmentation or where attackers have already gained foothold. The lack of known exploits in the wild provides a window for proactive mitigation, but organizations should not delay remediation due to the high severity and ease of exploitation once pmproxy is enabled.
Mitigation Recommendations
European organizations should take the following specific actions to mitigate CVE-2024-3019: 1) Audit all systems running PCP to identify if pmproxy is enabled, especially those managed via the Cockpit web interface. 2) If pmproxy is not required, disable the service to eliminate the attack vector. 3) For systems requiring pmproxy, restrict network access to the Redis backend by implementing strict firewall rules limiting access to trusted hosts only, ideally localhost or secured management networks. 4) Employ network segmentation to isolate monitoring infrastructure from general user networks to prevent unauthorized local network access. 5) Monitor logs and network traffic for unusual Redis commands or unexpected pmproxy activations. 6) Keep PCP installations updated and monitor vendor advisories for patches or configuration updates addressing this vulnerability. 7) Educate system administrators on the risks of enabling pmproxy and ensure secure configuration practices are followed. 8) Consider deploying host-based intrusion detection systems (HIDS) to detect anomalous activities related to Redis or pmproxy. These targeted mitigations go beyond generic advice by focusing on service enablement, network controls, and monitoring specific to the vulnerability context.
Affected Countries
For access to advanced analysis and higher rate limits, contact root@offseq.com
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.2
- Assigner Short Name
- redhat
- Date Reserved
- 2024-03-27T17:41:16.708Z
- Cvss Version
- 3.1
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 691ec3729f5a9374a9d10f8e
Added to database: 11/20/2025, 7:29:54 AM
Last enriched: 11/20/2025, 7:43:08 AM
Last updated: 12/4/2025, 9:32:52 PM
Views: 12
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
CVE-2025-66238: CWE-288 Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel in Sunbird DCIM dcTrack
HighCVE-2025-65900: n/a
UnknownCVE-2025-65899: n/a
UnknownCVE-2025-13932: CWE-639 Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key in SolisCloud Monitoring Platform (Cloud API & Device Control API)
UnknownCVE-2025-66479: CWE-693: Protection Mechanism Failure in anthropic-experimental sandbox-runtime
LowActions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
Need enhanced features?
Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.