Skip to main content

CVE-2024-36000: Vulnerability in Linux Linux

High
VulnerabilityCVE-2024-36000cvecve-2024-36000
Published: Mon May 20 2024 (05/20/2024, 09:48:02 UTC)
Source: CVE
Vendor/Project: Linux
Product: Linux

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm/hugetlb: fix missing hugetlb_lock for resv uncharge There is a recent report on UFFDIO_COPY over hugetlb: https://lore.kernel.org/all/000000000000ee06de0616177560@google.com/ 350: lockdep_assert_held(&hugetlb_lock); Should be an issue in hugetlb but triggered in an userfault context, where it goes into the unlikely path where two threads modifying the resv map together. Mike has a fix in that path for resv uncharge but it looks like the locking criteria was overlooked: hugetlb_cgroup_uncharge_folio_rsvd() will update the cgroup pointer, so it requires to be called with the lock held.

AI-Powered Analysis

AILast updated: 06/28/2025, 03:27:19 UTC

Technical Analysis

CVE-2024-36000 is a vulnerability identified in the Linux kernel's memory management subsystem, specifically within the handling of huge pages (hugetlb). The issue arises from a missing lock (hugetlb_lock) during the uncharging of reserved huge page memory (resv uncharge) in a multi-threaded context. The vulnerability is triggered in the userfaultfd (UFFDIO_COPY) context, which is used for handling page faults in user space. The problem occurs when two threads concurrently modify the reservation map (resv map) without proper synchronization, leading to a race condition. The function hugetlb_cgroup_uncharge_folio_rsvd(), which updates the control group (cgroup) pointer, requires the hugetlb_lock to be held to ensure thread-safe updates. However, this locking criterion was overlooked, potentially causing inconsistent or corrupted state in the huge page reservation accounting. This flaw could lead to memory corruption or inconsistent accounting of huge page usage within cgroups, potentially destabilizing the kernel or causing denial of service. The vulnerability affects specific Linux kernel versions identified by commit hashes, and while no known exploits are reported in the wild, the issue has been acknowledged and fixed by the Linux kernel developers. The technical details indicate that the vulnerability was reserved and published in May 2024, with no CVSS score assigned yet.

Potential Impact

For European organizations, the impact of CVE-2024-36000 could be significant, especially for those relying heavily on Linux-based infrastructure utilizing huge pages for performance optimization, such as in high-performance computing, large-scale databases, or containerized environments using cgroups. Exploitation of this vulnerability could lead to kernel instability, crashes, or denial of service, disrupting critical services and applications. Although no active exploits are currently known, the race condition and improper locking could be leveraged by local attackers or malicious processes to cause system instability or potentially escalate privileges if combined with other vulnerabilities. This risk is heightened in multi-tenant environments common in cloud service providers and data centers across Europe, where resource isolation and stability are paramount. Additionally, organizations with strict uptime requirements or those operating critical infrastructure could face operational disruptions and potential compliance issues if affected systems become unstable or unavailable.

Mitigation Recommendations

Mitigation should focus on promptly applying the official Linux kernel patches that address the missing hugetlb_lock during resv uncharge operations. Organizations should track kernel updates from their Linux distribution vendors and prioritize upgrading to patched kernel versions. For environments where immediate patching is not feasible, administrators should consider limiting or disabling the use of huge pages or userfaultfd features temporarily to reduce exposure. Monitoring kernel logs for unusual memory management errors or crashes related to hugetlb or userfaultfd can help detect potential exploitation attempts. Additionally, implementing strict access controls to limit unprivileged user access to userfaultfd interfaces and cgroup configurations can reduce the attack surface. For containerized environments, ensuring that container runtimes and orchestration platforms are updated and configured to minimize privilege escalation risks is advisable. Finally, organizations should maintain robust backup and recovery procedures to mitigate the impact of potential denial-of-service incidents stemming from this vulnerability.

Need more detailed analysis?Get Pro

Technical Details

Data Version
5.1
Assigner Short Name
Linux
Date Reserved
2024-05-17T13:50:33.149Z
Cisa Enriched
true
Cvss Version
null
State
PUBLISHED

Threat ID: 682d9821c4522896dcbddcd9

Added to database: 5/21/2025, 9:08:49 AM

Last enriched: 6/28/2025, 3:27:19 AM

Last updated: 8/16/2025, 3:12:57 AM

Views: 14

Actions

PRO

Updates to AI analysis are available only with a Pro account. Contact root@offseq.com for access.

Please log in to the Console to use AI analysis features.

Need enhanced features?

Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.

Latest Threats