CVE-2024-47741: Vulnerability in Linux Linux
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: fix race setting file private on concurrent lseek using same fd When doing concurrent lseek(2) system calls against the same file descriptor, using multiple threads belonging to the same process, we have a short time window where a race happens and can result in a memory leak. The race happens like this: 1) A program opens a file descriptor for a file and then spawns two threads (with the pthreads library for example), lets call them task A and task B; 2) Task A calls lseek with SEEK_DATA or SEEK_HOLE and ends up at file.c:find_desired_extent() while holding a read lock on the inode; 3) At the start of find_desired_extent(), it extracts the file's private_data pointer into a local variable named 'private', which has a value of NULL; 4) Task B also calls lseek with SEEK_DATA or SEEK_HOLE, locks the inode in shared mode and enters file.c:find_desired_extent(), where it also extracts file->private_data into its local variable 'private', which has a NULL value; 5) Because it saw a NULL file private, task A allocates a private structure and assigns to the file structure; 6) Task B also saw a NULL file private so it also allocates its own file private and then assigns it to the same file structure, since both tasks are using the same file descriptor. At this point we leak the private structure allocated by task A. Besides the memory leak, there's also the detail that both tasks end up using the same cached state record in the private structure (struct btrfs_file_private::llseek_cached_state), which can result in a use-after-free problem since one task can free it while the other is still using it (only one task took a reference count on it). Also, sharing the cached state is not a good idea since it could result in incorrect results in the future - right now it should not be a problem because it end ups being used only in extent-io-tree.c:count_range_bits() where we do range validation before using the cached state. Fix this by protecting the private assignment and check of a file while holding the inode's spinlock and keep track of the task that allocated the private, so that it's used only by that task in order to prevent user-after-free issues with the cached state record as well as potentially using it incorrectly in the future.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2024-47741 is a concurrency vulnerability in the Linux kernel's Btrfs filesystem implementation, specifically related to the handling of concurrent lseek(2) system calls with SEEK_DATA or SEEK_HOLE flags on the same file descriptor by multiple threads within the same process. The issue arises due to a race condition when multiple threads simultaneously invoke lseek on the same file descriptor, leading to improper handling of the file's private data pointer. Both threads may observe the private_data pointer as NULL and independently allocate separate private structures, with the second allocation overwriting the first. This results in a memory leak of the first allocated private structure. Furthermore, both threads end up sharing the same cached state record (struct btrfs_file_private::llseek_cached_state), which is intended to be task-specific. This sharing can cause use-after-free conditions because only one thread holds a reference count, and the other thread may access freed memory. Although currently the cached state is used in a manner that validates ranges before use, the underlying flaw could lead to incorrect behavior or memory corruption in future kernel versions or under different usage patterns. The fix involves serializing access to the private_data pointer assignment by holding the inode's spinlock and associating the private structure with the allocating task to prevent cross-thread misuse and use-after-free issues. This vulnerability affects Linux kernel versions prior to the patch and is relevant to systems using the Btrfs filesystem, which is commonly deployed in various Linux distributions. No known exploits are reported in the wild as of the publication date.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, this vulnerability poses risks primarily in environments where Btrfs is used extensively, such as enterprise servers, cloud infrastructure, and development systems running Linux. The memory leak itself could lead to gradual resource exhaustion, potentially causing denial of service (DoS) conditions on critical systems. More critically, the use-after-free scenario could be exploited to cause kernel crashes or potentially escalate privileges if combined with other vulnerabilities, undermining system integrity and availability. Organizations relying on multi-threaded applications that perform concurrent file operations on Btrfs volumes are particularly at risk. Given the Linux kernel's widespread use in European data centers, cloud providers, and embedded systems, unpatched systems may face stability issues or targeted attacks exploiting this flaw. The vulnerability does not directly expose confidential data but threatens system reliability and integrity, which can disrupt business operations and critical services.
Mitigation Recommendations
European organizations should prioritize updating their Linux kernel to the patched version that addresses CVE-2024-47741 as soon as it becomes available from their distribution vendors. Specifically, kernel updates that include the fix for serialized access to file private data and task-specific private structures must be applied. For environments where immediate patching is not feasible, organizations should audit and limit the use of Btrfs on multi-threaded applications performing concurrent lseek operations, potentially restricting such workloads or isolating them in controlled environments. Monitoring kernel logs for unusual memory allocation patterns or crashes related to Btrfs lseek operations can help detect exploitation attempts. Additionally, organizations should review and harden their multi-threaded application designs to avoid concurrent lseek calls on the same file descriptor where possible. Employing kernel live patching solutions, if supported, can reduce downtime during remediation. Finally, maintaining robust backup and recovery procedures is essential to mitigate potential service disruptions caused by exploitation.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Sweden, Finland, Poland, Italy, Spain
CVE-2024-47741: Vulnerability in Linux Linux
Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: fix race setting file private on concurrent lseek using same fd When doing concurrent lseek(2) system calls against the same file descriptor, using multiple threads belonging to the same process, we have a short time window where a race happens and can result in a memory leak. The race happens like this: 1) A program opens a file descriptor for a file and then spawns two threads (with the pthreads library for example), lets call them task A and task B; 2) Task A calls lseek with SEEK_DATA or SEEK_HOLE and ends up at file.c:find_desired_extent() while holding a read lock on the inode; 3) At the start of find_desired_extent(), it extracts the file's private_data pointer into a local variable named 'private', which has a value of NULL; 4) Task B also calls lseek with SEEK_DATA or SEEK_HOLE, locks the inode in shared mode and enters file.c:find_desired_extent(), where it also extracts file->private_data into its local variable 'private', which has a NULL value; 5) Because it saw a NULL file private, task A allocates a private structure and assigns to the file structure; 6) Task B also saw a NULL file private so it also allocates its own file private and then assigns it to the same file structure, since both tasks are using the same file descriptor. At this point we leak the private structure allocated by task A. Besides the memory leak, there's also the detail that both tasks end up using the same cached state record in the private structure (struct btrfs_file_private::llseek_cached_state), which can result in a use-after-free problem since one task can free it while the other is still using it (only one task took a reference count on it). Also, sharing the cached state is not a good idea since it could result in incorrect results in the future - right now it should not be a problem because it end ups being used only in extent-io-tree.c:count_range_bits() where we do range validation before using the cached state. Fix this by protecting the private assignment and check of a file while holding the inode's spinlock and keep track of the task that allocated the private, so that it's used only by that task in order to prevent user-after-free issues with the cached state record as well as potentially using it incorrectly in the future.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-2024-47741 is a concurrency vulnerability in the Linux kernel's Btrfs filesystem implementation, specifically related to the handling of concurrent lseek(2) system calls with SEEK_DATA or SEEK_HOLE flags on the same file descriptor by multiple threads within the same process. The issue arises due to a race condition when multiple threads simultaneously invoke lseek on the same file descriptor, leading to improper handling of the file's private data pointer. Both threads may observe the private_data pointer as NULL and independently allocate separate private structures, with the second allocation overwriting the first. This results in a memory leak of the first allocated private structure. Furthermore, both threads end up sharing the same cached state record (struct btrfs_file_private::llseek_cached_state), which is intended to be task-specific. This sharing can cause use-after-free conditions because only one thread holds a reference count, and the other thread may access freed memory. Although currently the cached state is used in a manner that validates ranges before use, the underlying flaw could lead to incorrect behavior or memory corruption in future kernel versions or under different usage patterns. The fix involves serializing access to the private_data pointer assignment by holding the inode's spinlock and associating the private structure with the allocating task to prevent cross-thread misuse and use-after-free issues. This vulnerability affects Linux kernel versions prior to the patch and is relevant to systems using the Btrfs filesystem, which is commonly deployed in various Linux distributions. No known exploits are reported in the wild as of the publication date.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, this vulnerability poses risks primarily in environments where Btrfs is used extensively, such as enterprise servers, cloud infrastructure, and development systems running Linux. The memory leak itself could lead to gradual resource exhaustion, potentially causing denial of service (DoS) conditions on critical systems. More critically, the use-after-free scenario could be exploited to cause kernel crashes or potentially escalate privileges if combined with other vulnerabilities, undermining system integrity and availability. Organizations relying on multi-threaded applications that perform concurrent file operations on Btrfs volumes are particularly at risk. Given the Linux kernel's widespread use in European data centers, cloud providers, and embedded systems, unpatched systems may face stability issues or targeted attacks exploiting this flaw. The vulnerability does not directly expose confidential data but threatens system reliability and integrity, which can disrupt business operations and critical services.
Mitigation Recommendations
European organizations should prioritize updating their Linux kernel to the patched version that addresses CVE-2024-47741 as soon as it becomes available from their distribution vendors. Specifically, kernel updates that include the fix for serialized access to file private data and task-specific private structures must be applied. For environments where immediate patching is not feasible, organizations should audit and limit the use of Btrfs on multi-threaded applications performing concurrent lseek operations, potentially restricting such workloads or isolating them in controlled environments. Monitoring kernel logs for unusual memory allocation patterns or crashes related to Btrfs lseek operations can help detect exploitation attempts. Additionally, organizations should review and harden their multi-threaded application designs to avoid concurrent lseek calls on the same file descriptor where possible. Employing kernel live patching solutions, if supported, can reduce downtime during remediation. Finally, maintaining robust backup and recovery procedures is essential to mitigate potential service disruptions caused by exploitation.
Affected Countries
For access to advanced analysis and higher rate limits, contact root@offseq.com
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.1
- Assigner Short Name
- Linux
- Date Reserved
- 2024-09-30T16:00:12.959Z
- Cisa Enriched
- true
- Cvss Version
- null
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 682d9825c4522896dcbe067b
Added to database: 5/21/2025, 9:08:53 AM
Last enriched: 6/28/2025, 8:12:30 PM
Last updated: 7/27/2025, 3:23:06 AM
Views: 13
Related Threats
CVE-2025-40770: CWE-300: Channel Accessible by Non-Endpoint in Siemens SINEC Traffic Analyzer
HighCVE-2025-40769: CWE-1164: Irrelevant Code in Siemens SINEC Traffic Analyzer
HighCVE-2025-40768: CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor in Siemens SINEC Traffic Analyzer
HighCVE-2025-40767: CWE-250: Execution with Unnecessary Privileges in Siemens SINEC Traffic Analyzer
HighCVE-2025-40766: CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption in Siemens SINEC Traffic Analyzer
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis are available only with a Pro account. Contact root@offseq.com for access.
External Links
Need enhanced features?
Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.