Skip to main content

CVE-2024-50102: Vulnerability in Linux Linux

High
VulnerabilityCVE-2024-50102cvecve-2024-50102
Published: Tue Nov 05 2024 (11/05/2024, 17:10:37 UTC)
Source: CVE
Vendor/Project: Linux
Product: Linux

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: x86: fix user address masking non-canonical speculation issue It turns out that AMD has a "Meltdown Lite(tm)" issue with non-canonical accesses in kernel space. And so using just the high bit to decide whether an access is in user space or kernel space ends up with the good old "leak speculative data" if you have the right gadget using the result: CVE-2020-12965 “Transient Execution of Non-Canonical Accesses“ Now, the kernel surrounds the access with a STAC/CLAC pair, and those instructions end up serializing execution on older Zen architectures, which closes the speculation window. But that was true only up until Zen 5, which renames the AC bit [1]. That improves performance of STAC/CLAC a lot, but also means that the speculation window is now open. Note that this affects not just the new address masking, but also the regular valid_user_address() check used by access_ok(), and the asm version of the sign bit check in the get_user() helpers. It does not affect put_user() or clear_user() variants, since there's no speculative result to be used in a gadget for those operations.

AI-Powered Analysis

AILast updated: 06/28/2025, 17:12:26 UTC

Technical Analysis

CVE-2024-50102 is a speculative execution vulnerability affecting the Linux kernel on x86 architectures, specifically related to AMD Zen processors. The vulnerability stems from how the kernel handles user address masking and non-canonical address speculation. Historically, AMD processors had a "Meltdown Lite" style issue (CVE-2020-12965) where speculative execution could leak kernel data when non-canonical addresses were accessed. The Linux kernel mitigated this by surrounding sensitive user address checks with STAC (Set AC Flag) and CLAC (Clear AC Flag) instructions, which serialized execution and closed the speculation window on older Zen architectures. However, with the introduction of Zen 5, the AC bit was renamed and the performance of STAC/CLAC improved, inadvertently reopening the speculation window. This change affects not only the new address masking logic but also the traditional valid_user_address() check used by access_ok() and the assembly version of the sign bit check in get_user() helpers. The vulnerability allows speculative execution to potentially leak sensitive kernel data if an attacker can craft the right gadget to exploit the speculative result. Notably, put_user() and clear_user() functions are not affected as they do not produce speculative results usable in such gadgets. This vulnerability is subtle and hardware-specific, relying on microarchitectural behavior changes in Zen 5 processors and Linux kernel address validation mechanisms. No known exploits are currently reported in the wild, and no CVSS score has been assigned yet.

Potential Impact

For European organizations, this vulnerability poses a risk of speculative data leakage from kernel memory, potentially exposing sensitive information such as cryptographic keys, passwords, or other confidential data processed by the kernel. Organizations running Linux servers or infrastructure on AMD Zen 5 processors are particularly at risk. The impact is more severe in multi-tenant environments such as cloud providers, hosting services, and virtualized infrastructures common in Europe, where an attacker might leverage this vulnerability to escape sandboxing or gain unauthorized access to kernel data. Confidentiality is primarily impacted, with integrity and availability less directly affected. The ease of exploitation depends on the attacker's ability to execute code on the vulnerable system and construct suitable speculative execution gadgets, which is non-trivial but feasible for skilled adversaries. The lack of known exploits suggests limited immediate threat, but the vulnerability's presence in widely used Linux kernels and AMD hardware means it could become a target once public awareness grows. European organizations in sectors like finance, government, and critical infrastructure, which rely heavily on Linux servers and AMD hardware, should consider this a significant risk to data confidentiality.

Mitigation Recommendations

1. Apply Linux kernel patches as soon as they become available that address this vulnerability by properly handling the AC bit changes on Zen 5 processors and restoring speculation barriers. 2. For organizations using AMD Zen 5 hardware, coordinate with hardware vendors and Linux distribution maintainers to ensure firmware and microcode updates are applied that may complement kernel mitigations. 3. Restrict untrusted code execution on vulnerable systems, especially in multi-tenant or shared environments, to reduce the risk of exploitation. 4. Employ kernel hardening techniques such as Kernel Page Table Isolation (KPTI) and speculative execution mitigations already present in Linux, verifying they are up to date and properly configured. 5. Monitor system logs and performance counters for unusual speculative execution patterns or anomalies that could indicate exploitation attempts. 6. Consider isolating critical workloads on hardware not affected by this vulnerability until patches are fully deployed. 7. Engage in threat intelligence sharing within European cybersecurity communities to stay informed on exploit developments related to this CVE.

Need more detailed analysis?Get Pro

Technical Details

Data Version
5.1
Assigner Short Name
Linux
Date Reserved
2024-10-21T19:36:19.946Z
Cisa Enriched
false
Cvss Version
null
State
PUBLISHED

Threat ID: 682d9825c4522896dcbdff48

Added to database: 5/21/2025, 9:08:53 AM

Last enriched: 6/28/2025, 5:12:26 PM

Last updated: 7/30/2025, 1:16:41 AM

Views: 10

Actions

PRO

Updates to AI analysis are available only with a Pro account. Contact root@offseq.com for access.

Please log in to the Console to use AI analysis features.

Need enhanced features?

Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.

Latest Threats