CVE-2024-50857VulnerabilityPublished 14 Jan 2025Updated 15 Jan 2025

CVE-2024-50857: gestioip-docker-compose · n/a

Affects gestioip-docker-composeSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · public exploit available (Exploit-DB) · CVSS 4.8 Medium.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 07:57 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

4.8Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 1.2% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 69% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: High
User Interaction: Required
Scope: Changed
Confidentiality: Low
Integrity: Low
Availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: High: The attacker is authorized with (i.e., requires) privileges that provide significant (e.g., administrative) control over the vulnerable component that could affect component-wide settings and files.
User Interaction: Required: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires a user to take some action before the vulnerability can be exploited.
Scope: Changed: An exploited vulnerability can affect resources beyond the security scope managed by the security authority of the vulnerable component. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are different and managed by different security authorities.
Confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the impacted component.
Integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact on the impacted component.
Availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

t = 0 is the CVE’s publication on cve.org

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 14 Jan 2025
Detectable: evidence found.
nuclei template: GestioIP - Reflected Cross-Site Scripting
Weaponised: evidence found.
1 Exploit-DB entry, 90 days after disclosure
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

CVE ID reserved
by mitre
2024-10-28, 78 days before disclosure
CVE published
on cve.org
2025-01-14, t = 0
First Exploit-DB entry (opens in a new tab)
GestioIP 3.5.7 - Cross-Site Scripting (XSS)
2025-04-14, 90 days after disclosure

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-26.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
GitHubmuebel/gestioip-docker-compose`pkg:github/muebel/gestioip-docker-compose`Other threats	Affected =3.5.7	Fixed in–

Check your own hosts for these packages with threat-finder (opens in a new tab), our free open-source scanner.

AI-suggested

To mitigate CVE-2024-50857, organizations should first verify if they are running GestioIP version 3.5.7 and restrict access to trusted users only. Employ Content Security Policy (CSP) headers to limit the execution of unauthorized scripts within the application context. Limit the number of users with elevated permissions and enforce the principle of least privilege to reduce the risk of exploitation. Educate users about the risks of clicking on suspicious links or submitting untrusted input. Monitor application logs for unusual activity indicative of XSS or CSRF attempts. Consider deploying Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) with rules targeting XSS payloads specific to GestioIP. Stay alert for official patches or updates from GestioIP developers and apply them promptly once released.

Description

The ip_do_job request in GestioIP v3.5.7 is vulnerable to Cross-Site Scripting (XSS). It allows data exfiltration and enables CSRF attacks. The vulnerability requires specific user permissions within the application to exploit successfully.

Impact

The primary impact of CVE-2024-50857 is on the confidentiality and integrity of data within GestioIP environments. Attackers exploiting this vulnerability can steal sensitive information such as session cookies, user credentials, or configuration data, potentially leading to unauthorized access or privilege escalation. The ability to perform CSRF attacks further increases the risk by enabling attackers to execute unauthorized actions on behalf of legitimate users. Although availability is not directly affected, the compromise of user sessions and data integrity can disrupt normal operations and trust in the system. Organizations relying on GestioIP for IP address management may face increased risk of targeted attacks, especially if users with elevated permissions are compromised. The requirement for specific user permissions and user interaction limits the attack surface but does not eliminate the threat, particularly in environments with many privileged users or where social engineering is feasible.

CWE-79Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') (opens in a new tab)
Base weaknessLikelihood of exploit: HighCWE Top 25 (2025): #1OWASP Top 10 A05:2025: Injection (opens in a new tab)
The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users.
Architecture and Design · Libraries or Frameworks
Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
Implementation · Architecture and Design
Understand the context in which your data will be used and the encoding that will be expected. This is especially important when transmitting data between different components, or when generating outputs that can contain multiple encodings at the same time, such as web pages or multi-part mail messages.
Architecture and Design · Implementation · Attack Surface Reduction
Understand all the potential areas where untrusted inputs can enter your software: parameters or arguments, cookies, anything read from the network, environment variables, reverse DNS lookups, query results, request headers, URL components, e-mail, files, filenames, databases, and any external systems that provide…
OWASP Cheat Sheets
Cross Site Scripting Prevention (opens in a new tab)
DOM based XSS Prevention (opens in a new tab)
Injection Prevention (opens in a new tab)
Abuse Case (opens in a new tab)
Deserialization (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V5.3.3 (opens in a new tab)
V1.5.1 (opens in a new tab)
Attack patterns
XSS Using MIME Type Mismatch (opens in a new tab)
DOM-Based XSS (opens in a new tab)
Reflected XSS (opens in a new tab)
Stored XSS (opens in a new tab)
Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

Timeline

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 27 Feb 2026, 22:47 UTC

Public exploits and detection1 Exploit-DB entry, a Nuclei detection template

WeaknessesCWE-79

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats