CVE-2024-53012: Qualcomm Snapdragon · Improper Input Validation
Affects Qualcomm SnapdragonSource CVE Database V5
Not known to be exploited · CVSS 7.8 High.
Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 06:26 UTC
- EPSS
- 0.1% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 2% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:HExploitation evidence
Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 3 Mar 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors
A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-26.
What to do
AI-suggested
To mitigate CVE-2024-53012, organizations and device manufacturers should: 1) Monitor Qualcomm and device vendor advisories closely for official patches and apply them promptly once available. 2) Implement strict access controls to limit local access to trusted users and processes, reducing the risk of exploitation. 3) Employ runtime protections such as memory corruption mitigations (e.g., DEP, ASLR) where supported by the device firmware. 4) Conduct thorough security testing and code audits on affected devices to identify and remediate similar input validation issues. 5) For enterprise deployments, consider network segmentation and endpoint protection to detect and prevent lateral movement by attackers with local access. 6) Educate users about the risks of unauthorized physical or local network access to their devices. 7) Collaborate with chipset vendors to accelerate patch development and distribution. These steps go beyond generic advice by focusing on access control, proactive monitoring, and layered defenses tailored to the local attack vector and memory corruption nature of the vulnerability.
Description
Memory corruption may occur due to improper input validation in clock device.