CVE-2024-53125: Vulnerability in Linux Linux
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: sync_linked_regs() must preserve subreg_def Range propagation must not affect subreg_def marks, otherwise the following example is rewritten by verifier incorrectly when BPF_F_TEST_RND_HI32 flag is set: 0: call bpf_ktime_get_ns call bpf_ktime_get_ns 1: r0 &= 0x7fffffff after verifier r0 &= 0x7fffffff 2: w1 = w0 rewrites w1 = w0 3: if w0 < 10 goto +0 --------------> r11 = 0x2f5674a6 (r) 4: r1 >>= 32 r11 <<= 32 (r) 5: r0 = r1 r1 |= r11 (r) 6: exit; if w0 < 0xa goto pc+0 r1 >>= 32 r0 = r1 exit (or zero extension of w1 at (2) is missing for architectures that require zero extension for upper register half). The following happens w/o this patch: - r0 is marked as not a subreg at (0); - w1 is marked as subreg at (2); - w1 subreg_def is overridden at (3) by copy_register_state(); - w1 is read at (5) but mark_insn_zext() does not mark (2) for zero extension, because w1 subreg_def is not set; - because of BPF_F_TEST_RND_HI32 flag verifier inserts random value for hi32 bits of (2) (marked (r)); - this random value is read at (5).
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2024-53125 is a vulnerability identified in the Linux kernel's Berkeley Packet Filter (BPF) verifier component. The issue arises from improper handling of subregister definitions (subreg_def) during range propagation within the BPF verifier, specifically when the BPF_F_TEST_RND_HI32 flag is set. The vulnerability is rooted in the sync_linked_regs() function, which fails to preserve subreg_def marks correctly. This leads to incorrect rewriting of BPF bytecode instructions by the verifier. In the example provided, a zero extension operation on a 32-bit register (w1) is missing on architectures that require zero extension for the upper half of the register. Consequently, the verifier inserts a random value into the high 32 bits of the register, which is then read and used in subsequent instructions. This behavior can cause unpredictable execution of BPF programs, potentially leading to incorrect program logic or bypassing of intended restrictions enforced by the verifier. The vulnerability affects multiple versions of the Linux kernel identified by the same commit hash, indicating a flaw in a specific kernel revision. Although no known exploits are currently reported in the wild, the flaw impacts the core kernel component responsible for safely executing BPF programs, which are widely used for networking, tracing, and security monitoring. The absence of a CVSS score suggests this is a newly disclosed issue requiring assessment based on technical details.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of CVE-2024-53125 can be significant due to the widespread use of Linux in enterprise servers, cloud infrastructure, and network devices. BPF programs are extensively utilized for packet filtering, performance monitoring, and security enforcement. An attacker capable of exploiting this vulnerability could cause the BPF verifier to accept malformed or malicious BPF programs that behave unpredictably, potentially leading to privilege escalation, denial of service, or bypass of security controls. This could disrupt critical services, compromise data integrity, or degrade system availability. Organizations relying on Linux-based network appliances or cloud platforms that leverage BPF for security and monitoring may face increased risk. Although exploitation requires crafting specific BPF programs and may depend on kernel configuration and architecture, the potential for subtle, hard-to-detect attacks on kernel-level components elevates the threat. The lack of known exploits currently reduces immediate risk but does not eliminate the possibility of future weaponization, especially in targeted attacks against high-value European infrastructure or enterprises.
Mitigation Recommendations
To mitigate CVE-2024-53125, European organizations should prioritize applying the official Linux kernel patches that address the subreg_def preservation issue in the BPF verifier. Kernel updates should be deployed promptly on all affected systems, especially those running custom or older kernel versions. Organizations should audit their use of BPF programs and restrict the ability to load or execute untrusted BPF code, limiting this capability to trusted administrators or processes. Employing kernel lockdown features and mandatory access controls (e.g., SELinux, AppArmor) can reduce the attack surface. Monitoring kernel logs and BPF verifier messages for anomalies may help detect exploitation attempts. Additionally, organizations should validate that their Linux distributions have incorporated the fix and coordinate with vendors for timely updates. For environments using container orchestration or cloud services, ensure that underlying host kernels are patched and that container runtimes do not allow unprivileged BPF program loading. Finally, conducting internal security reviews and penetration tests focusing on BPF usage can help identify residual risks.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Sweden, Finland, Italy, Spain
CVE-2024-53125: Vulnerability in Linux Linux
Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: sync_linked_regs() must preserve subreg_def Range propagation must not affect subreg_def marks, otherwise the following example is rewritten by verifier incorrectly when BPF_F_TEST_RND_HI32 flag is set: 0: call bpf_ktime_get_ns call bpf_ktime_get_ns 1: r0 &= 0x7fffffff after verifier r0 &= 0x7fffffff 2: w1 = w0 rewrites w1 = w0 3: if w0 < 10 goto +0 --------------> r11 = 0x2f5674a6 (r) 4: r1 >>= 32 r11 <<= 32 (r) 5: r0 = r1 r1 |= r11 (r) 6: exit; if w0 < 0xa goto pc+0 r1 >>= 32 r0 = r1 exit (or zero extension of w1 at (2) is missing for architectures that require zero extension for upper register half). The following happens w/o this patch: - r0 is marked as not a subreg at (0); - w1 is marked as subreg at (2); - w1 subreg_def is overridden at (3) by copy_register_state(); - w1 is read at (5) but mark_insn_zext() does not mark (2) for zero extension, because w1 subreg_def is not set; - because of BPF_F_TEST_RND_HI32 flag verifier inserts random value for hi32 bits of (2) (marked (r)); - this random value is read at (5).
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-2024-53125 is a vulnerability identified in the Linux kernel's Berkeley Packet Filter (BPF) verifier component. The issue arises from improper handling of subregister definitions (subreg_def) during range propagation within the BPF verifier, specifically when the BPF_F_TEST_RND_HI32 flag is set. The vulnerability is rooted in the sync_linked_regs() function, which fails to preserve subreg_def marks correctly. This leads to incorrect rewriting of BPF bytecode instructions by the verifier. In the example provided, a zero extension operation on a 32-bit register (w1) is missing on architectures that require zero extension for the upper half of the register. Consequently, the verifier inserts a random value into the high 32 bits of the register, which is then read and used in subsequent instructions. This behavior can cause unpredictable execution of BPF programs, potentially leading to incorrect program logic or bypassing of intended restrictions enforced by the verifier. The vulnerability affects multiple versions of the Linux kernel identified by the same commit hash, indicating a flaw in a specific kernel revision. Although no known exploits are currently reported in the wild, the flaw impacts the core kernel component responsible for safely executing BPF programs, which are widely used for networking, tracing, and security monitoring. The absence of a CVSS score suggests this is a newly disclosed issue requiring assessment based on technical details.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of CVE-2024-53125 can be significant due to the widespread use of Linux in enterprise servers, cloud infrastructure, and network devices. BPF programs are extensively utilized for packet filtering, performance monitoring, and security enforcement. An attacker capable of exploiting this vulnerability could cause the BPF verifier to accept malformed or malicious BPF programs that behave unpredictably, potentially leading to privilege escalation, denial of service, or bypass of security controls. This could disrupt critical services, compromise data integrity, or degrade system availability. Organizations relying on Linux-based network appliances or cloud platforms that leverage BPF for security and monitoring may face increased risk. Although exploitation requires crafting specific BPF programs and may depend on kernel configuration and architecture, the potential for subtle, hard-to-detect attacks on kernel-level components elevates the threat. The lack of known exploits currently reduces immediate risk but does not eliminate the possibility of future weaponization, especially in targeted attacks against high-value European infrastructure or enterprises.
Mitigation Recommendations
To mitigate CVE-2024-53125, European organizations should prioritize applying the official Linux kernel patches that address the subreg_def preservation issue in the BPF verifier. Kernel updates should be deployed promptly on all affected systems, especially those running custom or older kernel versions. Organizations should audit their use of BPF programs and restrict the ability to load or execute untrusted BPF code, limiting this capability to trusted administrators or processes. Employing kernel lockdown features and mandatory access controls (e.g., SELinux, AppArmor) can reduce the attack surface. Monitoring kernel logs and BPF verifier messages for anomalies may help detect exploitation attempts. Additionally, organizations should validate that their Linux distributions have incorporated the fix and coordinate with vendors for timely updates. For environments using container orchestration or cloud services, ensure that underlying host kernels are patched and that container runtimes do not allow unprivileged BPF program loading. Finally, conducting internal security reviews and penetration tests focusing on BPF usage can help identify residual risks.
Affected Countries
For access to advanced analysis and higher rate limits, contact root@offseq.com
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.1
- Assigner Short Name
- Linux
- Date Reserved
- 2024-11-19T17:17:24.995Z
- Cisa Enriched
- false
- Cvss Version
- null
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 682d9824c4522896dcbdfa95
Added to database: 5/21/2025, 9:08:52 AM
Last enriched: 6/28/2025, 3:12:05 PM
Last updated: 8/6/2025, 3:43:00 PM
Views: 16
Related Threats
CVE-2025-55295: CWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') in StuffAnThings qbit_manage
MediumCVE-2025-9150: SQL Injection in Surbowl dormitory-management-php
MediumCVE-2025-9149: Command Injection in Wavlink WL-NU516U1
MediumCVE-2025-55294: CWE-77: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command ('Command Injection') in bencevans screenshot-desktop
CriticalCVE-2025-55153
LowActions
Updates to AI analysis are available only with a Pro account. Contact root@offseq.com for access.
External Links
Need enhanced features?
Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.