CVE-2024-58098: Vulnerability in Linux Linux
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: track changes_pkt_data property for global functions When processing calls to certain helpers, verifier invalidates all packet pointers in a current state. For example, consider the following program: __attribute__((__noinline__)) long skb_pull_data(struct __sk_buff *sk, __u32 len) { return bpf_skb_pull_data(sk, len); } SEC("tc") int test_invalidate_checks(struct __sk_buff *sk) { int *p = (void *)(long)sk->data; if ((void *)(p + 1) > (void *)(long)sk->data_end) return TCX_DROP; skb_pull_data(sk, 0); *p = 42; return TCX_PASS; } After a call to bpf_skb_pull_data() the pointer 'p' can't be used safely. See function filter.c:bpf_helper_changes_pkt_data() for a list of such helpers. At the moment verifier invalidates packet pointers when processing helper function calls, and does not traverse global sub-programs when processing calls to global sub-programs. This means that calls to helpers done from global sub-programs do not invalidate pointers in the caller state. E.g. the program above is unsafe, but is not rejected by verifier. This commit fixes the omission by computing field bpf_subprog_info->changes_pkt_data for each sub-program before main verification pass. changes_pkt_data should be set if: - subprogram calls helper for which bpf_helper_changes_pkt_data returns true; - subprogram calls a global function, for which bpf_subprog_info->changes_pkt_data should be set. The verifier.c:check_cfg() pass is modified to compute this information. The commit relies on depth first instruction traversal done by check_cfg() and absence of recursive function calls: - check_cfg() would eventually visit every call to subprogram S in a state when S is fully explored; - when S is fully explored: - every direct helper call within S is explored (and thus changes_pkt_data is set if needed); - every call to subprogram S1 called by S was visited with S1 fully explored (and thus S inherits changes_pkt_data from S1). The downside of such approach is that dead code elimination is not taken into account: if a helper call inside global function is dead because of current configuration, verifier would conservatively assume that the call occurs for the purpose of the changes_pkt_data computation.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2024-58098 is a vulnerability in the Linux kernel's eBPF (extended Berkeley Packet Filter) verifier related to the handling of packet data pointers when global helper functions are called. The eBPF verifier is responsible for ensuring that eBPF programs are safe to run in kernel space by validating pointer usage and memory access. This vulnerability arises because the verifier invalidates packet pointers when processing calls to certain helper functions but fails to properly invalidate pointers when these helpers are called indirectly through global sub-programs (global functions). Specifically, when a global function calls a helper that modifies packet data, the verifier does not propagate the invalidation of packet pointers back to the caller's state, leading to unsafe pointer usage that the verifier does not reject. The root cause is that the verifier's analysis does not traverse global sub-program calls to compute the changes_pkt_data property, which indicates whether a sub-program modifies packet data. The fix involves enhancing the verifier's control flow graph analysis (check_cfg) to compute the changes_pkt_data field for each sub-program before the main verification pass, ensuring that any sub-program calling a helper that changes packet data or calling another sub-program with such behavior is marked accordingly. This prevents unsafe pointer usage from being accepted. The approach uses depth-first traversal of instructions and assumes no recursive function calls. A limitation is that dead code elimination is not considered, so the verifier conservatively assumes all helper calls in global functions occur, potentially rejecting some safe programs. This vulnerability could allow an attacker to craft eBPF programs that bypass verifier safety checks, potentially leading to kernel memory corruption or privilege escalation if exploited. However, no known exploits are currently reported in the wild.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, this vulnerability poses a risk primarily to systems running Linux kernels with eBPF enabled, which is common in modern Linux distributions used in servers, cloud infrastructure, and network appliances. Exploitation could allow attackers to bypass eBPF verifier protections, leading to unsafe memory access in kernel space. This could result in kernel crashes (denial of service), privilege escalation, or arbitrary code execution within the kernel context. Organizations relying on Linux-based network functions, container orchestration platforms (e.g., Kubernetes nodes), or security monitoring tools that use eBPF programs are particularly at risk. The impact is heightened in environments where untrusted users or processes can load eBPF programs, such as multi-tenant cloud platforms or shared hosting environments. The vulnerability could undermine the security guarantees of eBPF-based monitoring and filtering, potentially allowing attackers to evade detection or manipulate network traffic. Given the widespread use of Linux in European critical infrastructure, financial institutions, and government systems, exploitation could disrupt services or compromise sensitive data. However, the absence of known exploits and the complexity of crafting malicious eBPF programs may limit immediate risk, though patching remains essential to prevent future attacks.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Apply the official Linux kernel patches that address CVE-2024-58098 as soon as they become available from your Linux distribution vendor. 2. Restrict the ability to load eBPF programs to trusted users only, using Linux capabilities (e.g., CAP_BPF) and seccomp filters to limit exposure. 3. Employ kernel lockdown features and mandatory access controls (e.g., SELinux, AppArmor) to restrict eBPF program loading and execution. 4. Monitor kernel logs and audit trails for unusual eBPF program loading or verifier warnings that could indicate attempts to exploit this vulnerability. 5. For containerized environments, ensure container runtimes and orchestration platforms enforce strict policies on eBPF usage and privilege escalation. 6. Consider disabling eBPF functionality if it is not required in your environment, though this may impact performance or monitoring capabilities. 7. Stay informed about updates from Linux kernel maintainers and security advisories to promptly apply further fixes or mitigations. 8. Conduct internal code reviews and testing of custom eBPF programs to ensure they do not rely on unsafe pointer usage patterns that could be affected by this vulnerability.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Sweden, Finland, Italy, Spain, Poland, Belgium
CVE-2024-58098: Vulnerability in Linux Linux
Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: track changes_pkt_data property for global functions When processing calls to certain helpers, verifier invalidates all packet pointers in a current state. For example, consider the following program: __attribute__((__noinline__)) long skb_pull_data(struct __sk_buff *sk, __u32 len) { return bpf_skb_pull_data(sk, len); } SEC("tc") int test_invalidate_checks(struct __sk_buff *sk) { int *p = (void *)(long)sk->data; if ((void *)(p + 1) > (void *)(long)sk->data_end) return TCX_DROP; skb_pull_data(sk, 0); *p = 42; return TCX_PASS; } After a call to bpf_skb_pull_data() the pointer 'p' can't be used safely. See function filter.c:bpf_helper_changes_pkt_data() for a list of such helpers. At the moment verifier invalidates packet pointers when processing helper function calls, and does not traverse global sub-programs when processing calls to global sub-programs. This means that calls to helpers done from global sub-programs do not invalidate pointers in the caller state. E.g. the program above is unsafe, but is not rejected by verifier. This commit fixes the omission by computing field bpf_subprog_info->changes_pkt_data for each sub-program before main verification pass. changes_pkt_data should be set if: - subprogram calls helper for which bpf_helper_changes_pkt_data returns true; - subprogram calls a global function, for which bpf_subprog_info->changes_pkt_data should be set. The verifier.c:check_cfg() pass is modified to compute this information. The commit relies on depth first instruction traversal done by check_cfg() and absence of recursive function calls: - check_cfg() would eventually visit every call to subprogram S in a state when S is fully explored; - when S is fully explored: - every direct helper call within S is explored (and thus changes_pkt_data is set if needed); - every call to subprogram S1 called by S was visited with S1 fully explored (and thus S inherits changes_pkt_data from S1). The downside of such approach is that dead code elimination is not taken into account: if a helper call inside global function is dead because of current configuration, verifier would conservatively assume that the call occurs for the purpose of the changes_pkt_data computation.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-2024-58098 is a vulnerability in the Linux kernel's eBPF (extended Berkeley Packet Filter) verifier related to the handling of packet data pointers when global helper functions are called. The eBPF verifier is responsible for ensuring that eBPF programs are safe to run in kernel space by validating pointer usage and memory access. This vulnerability arises because the verifier invalidates packet pointers when processing calls to certain helper functions but fails to properly invalidate pointers when these helpers are called indirectly through global sub-programs (global functions). Specifically, when a global function calls a helper that modifies packet data, the verifier does not propagate the invalidation of packet pointers back to the caller's state, leading to unsafe pointer usage that the verifier does not reject. The root cause is that the verifier's analysis does not traverse global sub-program calls to compute the changes_pkt_data property, which indicates whether a sub-program modifies packet data. The fix involves enhancing the verifier's control flow graph analysis (check_cfg) to compute the changes_pkt_data field for each sub-program before the main verification pass, ensuring that any sub-program calling a helper that changes packet data or calling another sub-program with such behavior is marked accordingly. This prevents unsafe pointer usage from being accepted. The approach uses depth-first traversal of instructions and assumes no recursive function calls. A limitation is that dead code elimination is not considered, so the verifier conservatively assumes all helper calls in global functions occur, potentially rejecting some safe programs. This vulnerability could allow an attacker to craft eBPF programs that bypass verifier safety checks, potentially leading to kernel memory corruption or privilege escalation if exploited. However, no known exploits are currently reported in the wild.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, this vulnerability poses a risk primarily to systems running Linux kernels with eBPF enabled, which is common in modern Linux distributions used in servers, cloud infrastructure, and network appliances. Exploitation could allow attackers to bypass eBPF verifier protections, leading to unsafe memory access in kernel space. This could result in kernel crashes (denial of service), privilege escalation, or arbitrary code execution within the kernel context. Organizations relying on Linux-based network functions, container orchestration platforms (e.g., Kubernetes nodes), or security monitoring tools that use eBPF programs are particularly at risk. The impact is heightened in environments where untrusted users or processes can load eBPF programs, such as multi-tenant cloud platforms or shared hosting environments. The vulnerability could undermine the security guarantees of eBPF-based monitoring and filtering, potentially allowing attackers to evade detection or manipulate network traffic. Given the widespread use of Linux in European critical infrastructure, financial institutions, and government systems, exploitation could disrupt services or compromise sensitive data. However, the absence of known exploits and the complexity of crafting malicious eBPF programs may limit immediate risk, though patching remains essential to prevent future attacks.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Apply the official Linux kernel patches that address CVE-2024-58098 as soon as they become available from your Linux distribution vendor. 2. Restrict the ability to load eBPF programs to trusted users only, using Linux capabilities (e.g., CAP_BPF) and seccomp filters to limit exposure. 3. Employ kernel lockdown features and mandatory access controls (e.g., SELinux, AppArmor) to restrict eBPF program loading and execution. 4. Monitor kernel logs and audit trails for unusual eBPF program loading or verifier warnings that could indicate attempts to exploit this vulnerability. 5. For containerized environments, ensure container runtimes and orchestration platforms enforce strict policies on eBPF usage and privilege escalation. 6. Consider disabling eBPF functionality if it is not required in your environment, though this may impact performance or monitoring capabilities. 7. Stay informed about updates from Linux kernel maintainers and security advisories to promptly apply further fixes or mitigations. 8. Conduct internal code reviews and testing of custom eBPF programs to ensure they do not rely on unsafe pointer usage patterns that could be affected by this vulnerability.
For access to advanced analysis and higher rate limits, contact root@offseq.com
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.1
- Assigner Short Name
- Linux
- Date Reserved
- 2025-03-06T15:52:09.189Z
- Cisa Enriched
- false
- Cvss Version
- null
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 682d9818c4522896dcbd7b71
Added to database: 5/21/2025, 9:08:40 AM
Last enriched: 7/5/2025, 3:10:41 AM
Last updated: 8/11/2025, 2:59:04 PM
Views: 16
Related Threats
CVE-2025-8671: CWE-404 Improper Resource Shutdown or Release in IETF HTTP Working Group HTTP/2
HighCVE-2025-48989: CWE-404 Improper Resource Shutdown or Release in Apache Software Foundation Apache Tomcat
HighCVE-2025-55280: CWE-312: Cleartext Storage of Sensitive Information in ZKTeco Co WL20 Biometric Attendance System
MediumCVE-2025-55279: CWE-798: Use of Hard-coded Credentials in ZKTeco Co WL20 Biometric Attendance System
MediumCVE-2025-54465: CWE-798: Use of Hard-coded Credentials in ZKTeco Co WL20 Biometric Attendance System
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis are available only with a Pro account. Contact root@offseq.com for access.
External Links
Need enhanced features?
Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.