Skip to main content
Press slash or control plus K to focus the search. Use the arrow keys to navigate results and press enter to open a threat.
Reconnecting to live updates…

CVE-2024-5827: CWE-89 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command in vanna-ai vanna-ai/vanna

0
Critical
VulnerabilityCVE-2024-5827cvecve-2024-5827cwe-89
Published: Fri Jun 28 2024 (06/28/2024, 19:27:33 UTC)
Source: CVE Database V5
Vendor/Project: vanna-ai
Product: vanna-ai/vanna

Description

Vanna v0.3.4 is vulnerable to SQL injection in its DuckDB integration exposed to its Flask Web APIs. Attackers can inject malicious SQL training data and generate corresponding queries to write arbitrary files on the victim's file system, such as backdoor.php with contents `<?php system($_GET[0]); ?>`. This can lead to command execution or the creation of backdoors.

AI-Powered Analysis

AILast updated: 10/15/2025, 13:45:00 UTC

Technical Analysis

CVE-2024-5827 is a critical SQL injection vulnerability identified in vanna-ai's vanna software, version 0.3.4, which integrates DuckDB and exposes functionality through Flask Web APIs. The vulnerability arises from improper neutralization of special elements in SQL commands (CWE-89), allowing an unauthenticated attacker to inject malicious SQL training data. This injection enables the attacker to craft SQL queries that write arbitrary files to the victim's file system, such as a PHP backdoor file containing `<?php system($_GET[0]); ?>`. Exploiting this flaw can lead to remote code execution, enabling attackers to execute arbitrary system commands and establish persistent backdoors on the compromised server. The attack vector is network-based, requiring no privileges or user interaction, making it highly exploitable. The vulnerability affects unspecified versions but is confirmed in v0.3.4. No patches have been published at the time of disclosure, and no known exploits are reported in the wild yet. The vulnerability's CVSS v3.0 score is 9.8, reflecting its critical impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The flaw stems from insufficient input validation and sanitization in the DuckDB integration layer of the Flask API, which processes SQL training data. This vulnerability poses a significant risk to any organization deploying vanna-ai in environments accessible over the network, especially those exposing the API endpoints publicly or without strict access controls.

Potential Impact

For European organizations, the impact of CVE-2024-5827 can be severe. Exploitation can lead to full system compromise, including unauthorized access to sensitive data, disruption of AI model training workflows, and persistent backdoors that facilitate long-term espionage or sabotage. Organizations relying on vanna-ai for AI-driven analytics or data processing may face data breaches, loss of intellectual property, and operational downtime. The ability to write arbitrary files and execute commands can also be leveraged to move laterally within networks, escalating the threat beyond the initially compromised system. This is particularly concerning for sectors with high AI adoption such as finance, manufacturing, and research institutions across Europe. The lack of authentication requirements and ease of exploitation increase the risk of widespread attacks, especially if the vulnerable API is exposed to the internet. Additionally, regulatory compliance risks arise under GDPR if personal data is compromised due to this vulnerability.

Mitigation Recommendations

1. Immediately restrict network access to the vanna-ai Flask API endpoints, limiting exposure to trusted internal networks or VPNs. 2. Implement strict input validation and sanitization on all SQL training data inputs to prevent injection of malicious SQL commands. 3. Monitor file system changes on servers running vanna-ai for unauthorized file creation, especially suspicious PHP or script files. 4. Deploy Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) with rules targeting SQL injection patterns specific to DuckDB and Flask API traffic. 5. Conduct thorough code reviews and security testing on the DuckDB integration layer to identify and fix injection points. 6. Apply patches or updates from the vendor as soon as they become available. 7. Employ runtime application self-protection (RASP) tools to detect and block injection attempts in real time. 8. Educate development and operations teams about secure coding practices related to SQL injection and API security. 9. Use network segmentation to isolate AI infrastructure from critical business systems to limit lateral movement in case of compromise. 10. Prepare incident response plans specifically addressing web API compromises and backdoor detection.

Need more detailed analysis?Get Pro

Technical Details

Data Version
5.1
Assigner Short Name
@huntr_ai
Date Reserved
2024-06-10T23:46:32.719Z
Cvss Version
3.0
State
PUBLISHED

Threat ID: 68ef9b2a178f764e1f470cfd

Added to database: 10/15/2025, 1:01:30 PM

Last enriched: 10/15/2025, 1:45:00 PM

Last updated: 10/16/2025, 3:19:46 PM

Views: 1

Community Reviews

0 reviews

Crowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.

Sort by
Loading community insights…

Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.

Actions

PRO

Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.

Please log in to the Console to use AI analysis features.

Need enhanced features?

Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.

Latest Threats