CVE-2024-58275: CWE-88 Improper Neutralization of Argument Delimiters in a Command ('Argument Injection') in jpylypiw Easywall
Easywall 0.3.1 allows authenticated remote command execution via a command injection vulnerability in the /ports-save endpoint that suffers from a parameter injection flaw. Attackers can inject shell metacharacters to execute arbitrary commands on the server.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2024-58275 is a command injection vulnerability classified under CWE-88, affecting Easywall version 0.3.1, a network management or firewall-related software developed by jpylypiw. The vulnerability resides in the /ports-save endpoint, which processes input parameters without properly neutralizing argument delimiters such as shell metacharacters. This improper sanitization allows an authenticated attacker to inject arbitrary shell commands, leading to remote code execution on the server hosting Easywall. The vulnerability requires the attacker to have valid credentials (privileged or otherwise) to access the endpoint, but does not require further user interaction. The CVSS 4.0 vector indicates network attack vector (AV:N), low attack complexity (AC:L), no user interaction (UI:N), and privileges required (PR:L), with high impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability (all rated high). This means an attacker with limited privileges can escalate control by executing arbitrary commands, potentially compromising the entire system. No patches or fixes are currently linked, and no known exploits have been reported in the wild, but the vulnerability is publicly disclosed and should be considered critical for affected users. The flaw can be exploited to manipulate firewall rules, exfiltrate data, or pivot within the network, posing significant risks to organizational security.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, this vulnerability poses a significant risk to network security and operational continuity. Easywall is likely used in network perimeter defense or internal segmentation, so exploitation could lead to unauthorized access, data breaches, or disruption of network services. The ability to execute arbitrary commands can allow attackers to disable security controls, install malware, or move laterally within the network. Confidentiality is at risk due to potential data exfiltration, integrity is compromised by unauthorized changes to firewall or network configurations, and availability may be impacted by service disruption or denial-of-service conditions. Organizations in critical infrastructure sectors, government, finance, and telecommunications are particularly vulnerable due to the strategic importance of their network defenses. The requirement for authentication limits exposure but does not eliminate risk, especially if credential theft or weak authentication mechanisms exist. The lack of known exploits currently provides a window for proactive mitigation before active exploitation occurs.
Mitigation Recommendations
Immediate mitigation should focus on restricting access to the /ports-save endpoint to only highly trusted administrators and implementing multi-factor authentication to reduce the risk of credential compromise. Network segmentation and firewall rules should limit exposure of Easywall management interfaces to internal networks or VPNs. Input validation and sanitization must be applied to all parameters accepted by the /ports-save endpoint to neutralize shell metacharacters and prevent injection. If possible, upgrade to a patched version once available or apply vendor-provided workarounds. Monitoring and logging of access to the vulnerable endpoint should be enhanced to detect suspicious activities indicative of exploitation attempts. Conduct regular credential audits and enforce strong password policies to minimize the risk of unauthorized authentication. Consider deploying application-layer firewalls or intrusion detection systems capable of detecting command injection patterns targeting Easywall. Finally, prepare incident response plans specific to potential compromise scenarios involving Easywall.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Italy, Spain, Poland, Belgium, Sweden, Finland
CVE-2024-58275: CWE-88 Improper Neutralization of Argument Delimiters in a Command ('Argument Injection') in jpylypiw Easywall
Description
Easywall 0.3.1 allows authenticated remote command execution via a command injection vulnerability in the /ports-save endpoint that suffers from a parameter injection flaw. Attackers can inject shell metacharacters to execute arbitrary commands on the server.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-2024-58275 is a command injection vulnerability classified under CWE-88, affecting Easywall version 0.3.1, a network management or firewall-related software developed by jpylypiw. The vulnerability resides in the /ports-save endpoint, which processes input parameters without properly neutralizing argument delimiters such as shell metacharacters. This improper sanitization allows an authenticated attacker to inject arbitrary shell commands, leading to remote code execution on the server hosting Easywall. The vulnerability requires the attacker to have valid credentials (privileged or otherwise) to access the endpoint, but does not require further user interaction. The CVSS 4.0 vector indicates network attack vector (AV:N), low attack complexity (AC:L), no user interaction (UI:N), and privileges required (PR:L), with high impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability (all rated high). This means an attacker with limited privileges can escalate control by executing arbitrary commands, potentially compromising the entire system. No patches or fixes are currently linked, and no known exploits have been reported in the wild, but the vulnerability is publicly disclosed and should be considered critical for affected users. The flaw can be exploited to manipulate firewall rules, exfiltrate data, or pivot within the network, posing significant risks to organizational security.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, this vulnerability poses a significant risk to network security and operational continuity. Easywall is likely used in network perimeter defense or internal segmentation, so exploitation could lead to unauthorized access, data breaches, or disruption of network services. The ability to execute arbitrary commands can allow attackers to disable security controls, install malware, or move laterally within the network. Confidentiality is at risk due to potential data exfiltration, integrity is compromised by unauthorized changes to firewall or network configurations, and availability may be impacted by service disruption or denial-of-service conditions. Organizations in critical infrastructure sectors, government, finance, and telecommunications are particularly vulnerable due to the strategic importance of their network defenses. The requirement for authentication limits exposure but does not eliminate risk, especially if credential theft or weak authentication mechanisms exist. The lack of known exploits currently provides a window for proactive mitigation before active exploitation occurs.
Mitigation Recommendations
Immediate mitigation should focus on restricting access to the /ports-save endpoint to only highly trusted administrators and implementing multi-factor authentication to reduce the risk of credential compromise. Network segmentation and firewall rules should limit exposure of Easywall management interfaces to internal networks or VPNs. Input validation and sanitization must be applied to all parameters accepted by the /ports-save endpoint to neutralize shell metacharacters and prevent injection. If possible, upgrade to a patched version once available or apply vendor-provided workarounds. Monitoring and logging of access to the vulnerable endpoint should be enhanced to detect suspicious activities indicative of exploitation attempts. Conduct regular credential audits and enforce strong password policies to minimize the risk of unauthorized authentication. Consider deploying application-layer firewalls or intrusion detection systems capable of detecting command injection patterns targeting Easywall. Finally, prepare incident response plans specific to potential compromise scenarios involving Easywall.
For access to advanced analysis and higher rate limits, contact root@offseq.com
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.2
- Assigner Short Name
- VulnCheck
- Date Reserved
- 2025-12-04T16:01:43.113Z
- Cvss Version
- 4.0
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 6931f4df0459f550ecf89e34
Added to database: 12/4/2025, 8:53:51 PM
Last enriched: 12/4/2025, 9:10:00 PM
Last updated: 12/5/2025, 12:28:32 AM
Views: 4
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
CVE-2025-14052: Improper Access Controls in youlaitech youlai-mall
MediumCVE-2025-13373: CWE-89 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') in Advantech iView
HighCVE-2025-66564: CWE-405: Asymmetric Resource Consumption (Amplification) in sigstore timestamp-authority
HighCVE-2025-66559: CWE-129: Improper Validation of Array Index in taikoxyz taiko-mono
HighCVE-2025-66563: CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') in monkeytypegame monkeytype
HighActions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
Need enhanced features?
Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.