Skip to main content
CVE-2024-58275VulnerabilityPublished Updated

CVE-2024-58275: jpylypiw Easywall · Argument Injection

Affects jpylypiw EasywallSource CVE Database V5

0

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 8.7 High.

Data as of 25 Oct 2026, 19:02 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score
8.7High
How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.
EPSS
1.7% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 78% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Exploitation evidence

  1. Disclosed: evidence found.

    CVE published 4 Dec 2025

  2. Detectable: no evidence on record.

    No public nuclei template indexed

  3. Weaponised: no evidence on record.

    No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB

  4. Exploited in the wild: no evidence on record.

    Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation

  5. Observed by OffSeq Mirage: no evidence on record.

    No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-25.

What to do

Affected software

ProductAffectedFixed in
GitHubjpylypiw/easywallpkg:github/jpylypiw/easywallOther threatsAffected
  • =0.3.1
Fixed in–

Check your own hosts for these packages with threat-finder (opens in a new tab), our free open-source scanner.

AI-suggested

Until an official fix is available, restrict access to the /ports-save endpoint to trusted users only and monitor for suspicious activity. Avoid exposing Easywall instances to untrusted networks. Follow vendor channels for updates on patches or official mitigations.

Description

Easywall 0.3.1 allows authenticated remote command execution via a command injection vulnerability in the /ports-save endpoint that suffers from a parameter injection flaw. Attackers can inject shell metacharacters to execute arbitrary commands on the server.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…