CVE-2024-6383VulnerabilityPublished 3 Jul 2024Updated 3 Nov 2025

CVE-2024-6383: MongoDB libbson · Heap-based Buffer Overflow

Affects MongoDB libbsonSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 5.3 Medium : upgrade to 1.27.1 when convenient.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 06:26 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

5.3Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.6% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 49% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
Patch: Available – fixed in 1.27.1

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality: None
Integrity: Low
Availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without any interaction from any user.
Scope: Unchanged: An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
Confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the impacted component.
Integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact on the impacted component.
Availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 3 Jul 2024
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-26.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Upgrade MongoDB libbson to 1.27.1.

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
MongoDB Inc libbson	Affected =0 <1.27.1	Fixed in 1.27.1

AI-suggested

1. Immediately identify and inventory all software and services using libbson, particularly versions prior to 1.27.1. 2. 3. If patches are not yet available, consider temporary mitigations such as disabling or restricting access to services using vulnerable libbson components. 4. Employ runtime memory protection tools such as AddressSanitizer or similar to detect heap corruption during testing and staging. 5. Conduct thorough code reviews and fuzz testing on applications that use bson_string_append or related functions to identify potential exploitation paths. 6. Monitor network traffic and logs for anomalous behavior that could indicate exploitation attempts, focusing on services interfacing with MongoDB C Driver. 7. Engage with software vendors and third-party providers to ensure they are aware of the vulnerability and have plans to update their products. 8. Incorporate this vulnerability into incident response plans and threat modeling to prepare for potential exploitation scenarios. 9. Educate development teams on secure memory management practices to prevent similar vulnerabilities in custom code.

Description

The bson_string_append function in MongoDB C Driver may be vulnerable to a buffer overflow where the function might attempt to allocate too small of buffer and may lead to memory corruption of neighbouring heap memory. This issue affects libbson versions prior to 1.27.1

Impact

For European organizations, the impact of CVE-2024-6383 can be substantial, especially for those relying on MongoDB C Driver and libbson in critical applications such as financial services, healthcare, telecommunications, and government infrastructure. Exploitation could lead to application crashes, denial of service, or potentially unauthorized code execution, threatening data integrity and system reliability. Given the widespread use of MongoDB and its drivers in backend services and cloud environments, this vulnerability could be leveraged to disrupt services or pivot within networks. The absence of confidentiality impact reduces the risk of data leakage, but integrity and availability concerns remain significant. Organizations using containerized or microservices architectures that embed libbson should assess their exposure. Additionally, the vulnerability could be exploited in supply chain attacks if third-party software bundles vulnerable libbson versions. The medium severity rating suggests that while immediate catastrophic impact is unlikely, the vulnerability should not be ignored, especially in high-value or sensitive environments.

CWE-122Heap-based Buffer Overflow (opens in a new tab)
Variant weaknessLikelihood of exploit: HighCWE Top 25 (2025): #16
A heap overflow condition is a buffer overflow, where the buffer that can be overwritten is allocated in the heap portion of memory, generally meaning that the buffer was allocated using a routine such as malloc().
Pre-design: Use a language or compiler that performs automatic bounds checking.
Architecture and Design
Use an abstraction library to abstract away risky APIs. Not a complete solution.
Operation · Build and Compilation · Environment Hardening
Use automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are offered by certain compilers or compiler extensions. Examples include: the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag, Fedora/Red Hat FORTIFY_SOURCE GCC flag, StackGuard, and ProPolice, which provide various mechanisms including canary-based detection and range/index…
OWASP Cheat Sheets
XML Security (opens in a new tab)
Mass Assignment (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V13.3.1 (opens in a new tab)
V5.1.4 (opens in a new tab)
V5.1.3 (opens in a new tab)
Attack patterns
Forced Integer Overflow (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 3 Nov 2025, 20:07 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-122

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats