CVE-2024-8676: Improper Authorization
A vulnerability was found in CRI-O, where it can be requested to take a checkpoint archive of a container and later be asked to restore it. When it does that restoration, it attempts to restore the mounts from the restore archive instead of the pod request. As a result, the validations run on the pod spec, verifying that the pod has access to the mounts it specifies are not applicable to a restored container. This flaw allows a malicious user to trick CRI-O into restoring a pod that doesn't have access to host mounts. The user needs access to the kubelet or cri-o socket to call the restore endpoint and trigger the restore.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2024-8676 is a high-severity vulnerability affecting CRI-O container runtime versions 0, 1.30.0, and 1.31.0. The flaw arises from improper authorization during the container checkpoint and restore process. Specifically, CRI-O allows a container's checkpoint archive to be created and later restored. During restoration, CRI-O attempts to reinstate the mounts from the checkpoint archive rather than validating mounts against the current pod specification. This bypasses the usual validation checks that ensure a pod has legitimate access to specified host mounts. Consequently, a malicious user with access to the kubelet or CRI-O socket can invoke the restore endpoint to restore a container with mounts that the pod does not have permission to access. This can lead to unauthorized access to host filesystem mounts, potentially exposing sensitive data or enabling privilege escalation within the container environment. The vulnerability requires network access (AV:N) but has high attack complexity (AC:H), no privileges required (PR:N), and no user interaction (UI:N). The impact on confidentiality and integrity is high, while availability is not affected. No known exploits are currently reported in the wild, but the vulnerability poses a significant risk in Kubernetes environments using vulnerable CRI-O versions, especially where kubelet or CRI-O sockets are exposed or insufficiently protected.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, this vulnerability could have severe consequences, particularly for enterprises and service providers relying on Kubernetes clusters with CRI-O as the container runtime. Unauthorized restoration of containers with improper mounts can lead to exposure of sensitive host data, breach of data confidentiality, and potential lateral movement within the infrastructure. This risk is amplified in regulated sectors such as finance, healthcare, and critical infrastructure, where data protection and system integrity are paramount. Additionally, organizations using multi-tenant Kubernetes clusters may face cross-tenant data leakage or privilege escalation attacks. The vulnerability could disrupt trust in containerized workloads and complicate compliance with European data protection regulations like GDPR. Given the increasing adoption of container orchestration in European IT environments, the impact spans from cloud service providers to enterprises running private or hybrid Kubernetes clusters.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Immediate patching: Upgrade CRI-O to a version beyond 1.31.0 where this vulnerability is fixed. If a patch is not yet available, consider temporarily disabling the checkpoint and restore functionality if feasible. 2. Restrict access: Limit access to the kubelet and CRI-O sockets strictly to trusted administrators and service accounts. Use network segmentation and firewall rules to prevent unauthorized network access. 3. Harden kubelet security: Enable authentication and authorization mechanisms on the kubelet API to prevent unauthorized calls to sensitive endpoints. 4. Monitor and audit: Implement continuous monitoring and logging of kubelet and CRI-O socket access, focusing on checkpoint and restore operations to detect suspicious activity. 5. Use Pod Security Policies or equivalent admission controls to restrict mount permissions and capabilities granted to pods. 6. Employ runtime security tools that can detect anomalous container behavior or unauthorized mount access. 7. Review and minimize host mount usage in pods to reduce the attack surface. 8. Educate DevOps and security teams about the risks of exposing container runtime sockets and the importance of least privilege principles in Kubernetes environments.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Sweden, Finland, Belgium, Italy, Spain, Poland
CVE-2024-8676: Improper Authorization
Description
A vulnerability was found in CRI-O, where it can be requested to take a checkpoint archive of a container and later be asked to restore it. When it does that restoration, it attempts to restore the mounts from the restore archive instead of the pod request. As a result, the validations run on the pod spec, verifying that the pod has access to the mounts it specifies are not applicable to a restored container. This flaw allows a malicious user to trick CRI-O into restoring a pod that doesn't have access to host mounts. The user needs access to the kubelet or cri-o socket to call the restore endpoint and trigger the restore.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-2024-8676 is a high-severity vulnerability affecting CRI-O container runtime versions 0, 1.30.0, and 1.31.0. The flaw arises from improper authorization during the container checkpoint and restore process. Specifically, CRI-O allows a container's checkpoint archive to be created and later restored. During restoration, CRI-O attempts to reinstate the mounts from the checkpoint archive rather than validating mounts against the current pod specification. This bypasses the usual validation checks that ensure a pod has legitimate access to specified host mounts. Consequently, a malicious user with access to the kubelet or CRI-O socket can invoke the restore endpoint to restore a container with mounts that the pod does not have permission to access. This can lead to unauthorized access to host filesystem mounts, potentially exposing sensitive data or enabling privilege escalation within the container environment. The vulnerability requires network access (AV:N) but has high attack complexity (AC:H), no privileges required (PR:N), and no user interaction (UI:N). The impact on confidentiality and integrity is high, while availability is not affected. No known exploits are currently reported in the wild, but the vulnerability poses a significant risk in Kubernetes environments using vulnerable CRI-O versions, especially where kubelet or CRI-O sockets are exposed or insufficiently protected.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, this vulnerability could have severe consequences, particularly for enterprises and service providers relying on Kubernetes clusters with CRI-O as the container runtime. Unauthorized restoration of containers with improper mounts can lead to exposure of sensitive host data, breach of data confidentiality, and potential lateral movement within the infrastructure. This risk is amplified in regulated sectors such as finance, healthcare, and critical infrastructure, where data protection and system integrity are paramount. Additionally, organizations using multi-tenant Kubernetes clusters may face cross-tenant data leakage or privilege escalation attacks. The vulnerability could disrupt trust in containerized workloads and complicate compliance with European data protection regulations like GDPR. Given the increasing adoption of container orchestration in European IT environments, the impact spans from cloud service providers to enterprises running private or hybrid Kubernetes clusters.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Immediate patching: Upgrade CRI-O to a version beyond 1.31.0 where this vulnerability is fixed. If a patch is not yet available, consider temporarily disabling the checkpoint and restore functionality if feasible. 2. Restrict access: Limit access to the kubelet and CRI-O sockets strictly to trusted administrators and service accounts. Use network segmentation and firewall rules to prevent unauthorized network access. 3. Harden kubelet security: Enable authentication and authorization mechanisms on the kubelet API to prevent unauthorized calls to sensitive endpoints. 4. Monitor and audit: Implement continuous monitoring and logging of kubelet and CRI-O socket access, focusing on checkpoint and restore operations to detect suspicious activity. 5. Use Pod Security Policies or equivalent admission controls to restrict mount permissions and capabilities granted to pods. 6. Employ runtime security tools that can detect anomalous container behavior or unauthorized mount access. 7. Review and minimize host mount usage in pods to reduce the attack surface. 8. Educate DevOps and security teams about the risks of exposing container runtime sockets and the importance of least privilege principles in Kubernetes environments.
For access to advanced analysis and higher rate limits, contact root@offseq.com
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.1
- Assigner Short Name
- redhat
- Date Reserved
- 2024-09-10T19:56:52.932Z
- Cisa Enriched
- true
- Cvss Version
- 3.1
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 682d9839c4522896dcbed004
Added to database: 5/21/2025, 9:09:13 AM
Last enriched: 6/25/2025, 5:23:12 PM
Last updated: 7/31/2025, 12:43:27 PM
Views: 12
Related Threats
CVE-2025-34154: CWE-22 Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') in Synergetic Data Systems Inc. UnForm Server Manager
CriticalCVE-2025-8927: Improper Restriction of Excessive Authentication Attempts in mtons mblog
MediumCVE-2025-43988: n/a
CriticalCVE-2025-8926: SQL Injection in SourceCodester COVID 19 Testing Management System
MediumCVE-2025-43986: n/a
CriticalActions
Updates to AI analysis are available only with a Pro account. Contact root@offseq.com for access.
External Links
Need enhanced features?
Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.