CVE-2025-0052: CWE-20 Improper Input Validation in Pure Storage FlashBlade
Improper input validation performed during the authentication process of FlashBlade could lead to a system Denial of Service.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2025-0052 is a high-severity vulnerability affecting Pure Storage FlashBlade storage systems, specifically versions 3.3.0 through 4.5.0. The vulnerability is classified under CWE-20, which relates to improper input validation. During the authentication process of FlashBlade, improper validation of input data can be exploited to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) condition. This means that an attacker, without any privileges or authentication, can send specially crafted input to the authentication mechanism, triggering a failure that disrupts the normal operation of the system. The CVSS 4.0 base score of 8.3 reflects the critical nature of the vulnerability, with network attack vector (AV:N), high attack complexity (AC:H), no privileges required (PR:N), no user interaction (UI:N), and no confidentiality impact (VC:N). However, it does have a low impact on integrity (VI:L) and a high impact on availability (VA:H), indicating that while data confidentiality and integrity are mostly preserved, the system’s availability can be severely impacted. The vulnerability does not require user interaction or authentication, making it remotely exploitable by unauthenticated attackers. Although no known exploits are currently reported in the wild, the potential for disruption in enterprise environments is significant given the critical role of FlashBlade in high-performance storage and data management. The lack of available patches at the time of publication underscores the urgency for organizations to implement interim mitigations and monitor for updates from Pure Storage.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of this vulnerability can be substantial, especially for those relying on Pure Storage FlashBlade systems for critical data storage and processing tasks. A successful exploitation could lead to denial of service, causing downtime and disruption of business operations, data access delays, and potential loss of productivity. Industries such as finance, healthcare, telecommunications, and government agencies that depend on high availability and rapid data access could face operational risks and compliance challenges. The disruption could also affect cloud service providers and data centers in Europe that use FlashBlade for scalable storage solutions. Given the high availability impact, organizations may experience cascading effects on dependent applications and services, potentially leading to broader service outages. Additionally, the absence of known exploits currently does not preclude future attacks, so proactive risk management is essential.
Mitigation Recommendations
Specific mitigation steps include: 1) Immediate inventory and identification of all Pure Storage FlashBlade systems running affected versions (3.3.0 through 4.5.0). 2) Engage with Pure Storage support to obtain any available patches or hotfixes as soon as they are released. 3) Implement network-level protections such as restricting access to the FlashBlade management interfaces to trusted IP addresses and networks using firewalls and access control lists (ACLs). 4) Monitor authentication logs and network traffic for unusual or malformed authentication attempts that could indicate exploitation attempts. 5) Employ rate limiting or throttling on authentication requests to reduce the risk of DoS conditions triggered by repeated malicious inputs. 6) Consider deploying intrusion detection/prevention systems (IDS/IPS) with signatures or heuristics tuned to detect anomalous authentication traffic patterns targeting FlashBlade devices. 7) Develop and test incident response plans specifically for storage system outages to minimize downtime and data access disruption. 8) Maintain regular backups and ensure recovery procedures are in place to mitigate the impact of potential service interruptions. These steps go beyond generic advice by focusing on network segmentation, monitoring, and proactive engagement with the vendor for patch management.
Affected Countries
Germany, United Kingdom, France, Netherlands, Sweden, Switzerland, Italy
CVE-2025-0052: CWE-20 Improper Input Validation in Pure Storage FlashBlade
Description
Improper input validation performed during the authentication process of FlashBlade could lead to a system Denial of Service.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-2025-0052 is a high-severity vulnerability affecting Pure Storage FlashBlade storage systems, specifically versions 3.3.0 through 4.5.0. The vulnerability is classified under CWE-20, which relates to improper input validation. During the authentication process of FlashBlade, improper validation of input data can be exploited to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) condition. This means that an attacker, without any privileges or authentication, can send specially crafted input to the authentication mechanism, triggering a failure that disrupts the normal operation of the system. The CVSS 4.0 base score of 8.3 reflects the critical nature of the vulnerability, with network attack vector (AV:N), high attack complexity (AC:H), no privileges required (PR:N), no user interaction (UI:N), and no confidentiality impact (VC:N). However, it does have a low impact on integrity (VI:L) and a high impact on availability (VA:H), indicating that while data confidentiality and integrity are mostly preserved, the system’s availability can be severely impacted. The vulnerability does not require user interaction or authentication, making it remotely exploitable by unauthenticated attackers. Although no known exploits are currently reported in the wild, the potential for disruption in enterprise environments is significant given the critical role of FlashBlade in high-performance storage and data management. The lack of available patches at the time of publication underscores the urgency for organizations to implement interim mitigations and monitor for updates from Pure Storage.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of this vulnerability can be substantial, especially for those relying on Pure Storage FlashBlade systems for critical data storage and processing tasks. A successful exploitation could lead to denial of service, causing downtime and disruption of business operations, data access delays, and potential loss of productivity. Industries such as finance, healthcare, telecommunications, and government agencies that depend on high availability and rapid data access could face operational risks and compliance challenges. The disruption could also affect cloud service providers and data centers in Europe that use FlashBlade for scalable storage solutions. Given the high availability impact, organizations may experience cascading effects on dependent applications and services, potentially leading to broader service outages. Additionally, the absence of known exploits currently does not preclude future attacks, so proactive risk management is essential.
Mitigation Recommendations
Specific mitigation steps include: 1) Immediate inventory and identification of all Pure Storage FlashBlade systems running affected versions (3.3.0 through 4.5.0). 2) Engage with Pure Storage support to obtain any available patches or hotfixes as soon as they are released. 3) Implement network-level protections such as restricting access to the FlashBlade management interfaces to trusted IP addresses and networks using firewalls and access control lists (ACLs). 4) Monitor authentication logs and network traffic for unusual or malformed authentication attempts that could indicate exploitation attempts. 5) Employ rate limiting or throttling on authentication requests to reduce the risk of DoS conditions triggered by repeated malicious inputs. 6) Consider deploying intrusion detection/prevention systems (IDS/IPS) with signatures or heuristics tuned to detect anomalous authentication traffic patterns targeting FlashBlade devices. 7) Develop and test incident response plans specifically for storage system outages to minimize downtime and data access disruption. 8) Maintain regular backups and ensure recovery procedures are in place to mitigate the impact of potential service interruptions. These steps go beyond generic advice by focusing on network segmentation, monitoring, and proactive engagement with the vendor for patch management.
Affected Countries
For access to advanced analysis and higher rate limits, contact root@offseq.com
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.1
- Assigner Short Name
- PureStorage
- Date Reserved
- 2024-12-04T17:42:04.001Z
- Cvss Version
- 4.0
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 68486f71813f166aeb76f17c
Added to database: 6/10/2025, 5:46:25 PM
Last enriched: 7/10/2025, 6:02:00 PM
Last updated: 11/22/2025, 4:52:47 AM
Views: 48
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
CVE-2025-2609: CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (XSS or 'Cross-site Scripting') in MagnusSolution MagnusBilling
HighCVE-2024-9643: CWE-489 Active Debug Code in Four-Faith F3x36
CriticalCVE-2025-65947: CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption in jzeuzs thread-amount
HighCVE-2025-65946: CWE-77: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command ('Command Injection') in RooCodeInc Roo-Code
HighCVE-2025-12678
UnknownActions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
External Links
Need enhanced features?
Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.