Skip to main content
CVE-2025-0689VulnerabilityPublished Updated

CVE-2025-0689: grub2 · Classic Buffer Overflow

Affects grub2Source CVE Database V5

0

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 7.8 High.

Data as of 25 Oct 2026, 19:17 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score
7.8High
How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.
EPSS
0.4% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 42% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Exploitation evidence

  1. Disclosed: evidence found.

    CVE published 3 Mar 2025

  2. Detectable: no evidence on record.

    No public nuclei template indexed

  3. Weaponised: no evidence on record.

    No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB

  4. Exploited in the wild: no evidence on record.

    Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation

  5. Observed by OffSeq Mirage: no evidence on record.

    No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-25.

What to do

Affected software

ProductAffectedFixed in
grub2Affected
  • <=2.12
Fixed in–
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 10Affected–Fixed in–
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 7Affected–Fixed in–
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8Affected–Fixed in–
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9Affected–Fixed in–
Red HatRed Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4Affected–Fixed in–

AI-suggested

Until a patch is available, avoid using untrusted UDF filesystem images with affected GRUB versions.

Description

When reading data from disk, the grub's UDF filesystem module utilizes the user controlled data length metadata to allocate its internal buffers. In certain scenarios, while iterating through disk sectors, it assumes the read size from the disk is always smaller than the allocated buffer size which is not guaranteed. A crafted filesystem image may lead to a heap-based buffer overflow resulting in critical data to be corrupted, resulting in the risk of arbitrary code execution by-passing secure boot protections.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…