CVE-2025-10201: Google Chrome · Inappropriate Implementation
Affects Google ChromeSource CVE Database V5
Not known to be exploited · CVSS 8.8 High.
Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 17:16 UTC
- EPSS
- 0.2% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 21% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:HExploitation evidence
Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 10 Sep 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors
A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.
What to do
Affected software
| Product | Affected | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| Google Chrome | Affected
| Fixed in– |
AI-suggested
To mitigate CVE-2025-10201, organizations and users should promptly update Google Chrome to version 140.0.7339.127 or later once it becomes available. Until the patch is applied, users should exercise caution when browsing untrusted websites and avoid clicking on suspicious links or opening unknown HTML content. Network-level protections such as web filtering and intrusion prevention systems should be configured to block access to known malicious sites. Enterprises should enforce policies that restrict browser extensions and plugins that could be leveraged to facilitate exploitation. Additionally, enabling multi-factor authentication (MFA) on critical web services can reduce the impact of credential theft resulting from this vulnerability. Security teams should monitor threat intelligence feeds for any emerging exploits and conduct targeted user awareness training about phishing risks. For high-security environments, consider deploying browser isolation technologies or sandboxing to limit the potential damage from compromised browser processes. Finally, maintain up-to-date endpoint detection and response (EDR) solutions to detect anomalous browser behavior indicative of exploitation attempts.
Description
Inappropriate implementation in Mojo in Google Chrome on Android, Linux, ChromeOS prior to 140.0.7339.127 allowed a remote attacker to bypass site isolation via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)