CVE-2025-10264VulnerabilityPublished 12 Sep 2025

CVE-2025-10264: Digiever DS-1200 · Exposure of Sensitive System Information to an Unauthorized Control Sphere

Affects Digiever DS-1200Source CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 10.0 Critical.

Data as of 25 Oct 2026, 19:02 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

10.0Critical

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.5% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 42% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Scope: Changed
Confidentiality: High
Integrity: High
Availability: High

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without any interaction from any user.
Scope: Changed: An exploited vulnerability can affect resources beyond the security scope managed by the security authority of the vulnerable component. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are different and managed by different security authorities.
Confidentiality: High: There is total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all resources within the impacted component being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact.
Integrity: High: There is a total loss of integrity, or a complete loss of protection. For example, the attacker is able to modify any/all files protected by the impacted component. Alternatively, only some files can be modified, but malicious modification would present a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component.
Availability: High: There is total loss of availability, resulting in the attacker being able to fully deny access to resources in the impacted component; this loss is either sustained (while the attacker continues to deliver the attack) or persistent (the condition persists even after the attack has completed). Alternatively, the attacker has the ability to deny some availability, but the loss of availability presents a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component (e.g., the attacker cannot disrupt existing connections, but can prevent new connections; the attacker can repeatedly exploit a vulnerability that, in each instance of a successful attack, leaks a only small amount of memory, but after repeated exploitation causes a service to become completely unavailable).

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 12 Sep 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-25.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
Digiever DS-1200	Affected =0	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

Given the lack of available patches, European organizations should implement the following specific mitigation strategies: 1) Immediately isolate affected Digiever DS-1200 NVRs from public or untrusted networks to prevent remote exploitation. 2) Restrict network access to these devices by implementing strict firewall rules and network segmentation, allowing only trusted management stations to communicate with the NVRs. 3) Monitor network traffic for unusual access patterns or attempts to retrieve configuration files from the NVRs. 4) Where possible, replace affected devices with alternative NVRs from vendors with no known vulnerabilities or with patched firmware. 5) If replacement is not feasible, consider deploying additional security controls such as VPNs or jump hosts for remote access to the NVRs to add authentication layers. 6) Conduct regular audits of device configurations and credentials, changing default or exposed passwords immediately. 7) Engage with Digiever support channels to obtain updates on patch availability and apply them promptly once released. 8) Train security and IT staff to recognize signs of compromise related to video surveillance infrastructure. These targeted actions go beyond generic advice by focusing on network isolation, access control, and proactive monitoring specific to the nature of this vulnerability.

Description

Certain models of NVR developed by Digiever has an Exposure of Sensitive Information vulnerability, allowing unauthenticated remoter attackers to access the system configuration file and obtain plaintext credentials of the NVR and its connected cameras.

Impact

For European organizations, the impact of CVE-2025-10264 is substantial. NVRs like the Digiever DS-1200 are commonly deployed in sectors such as government facilities, transportation hubs, critical infrastructure, corporate campuses, and retail environments. Unauthorized access to system configuration and plaintext credentials could allow attackers to disable or manipulate surveillance systems, undermining physical security and potentially facilitating further cyber or physical attacks. The compromise of video feeds can lead to privacy violations and loss of sensitive visual data. Additionally, attackers gaining control over these devices may use them as entry points into broader enterprise networks, escalating the risk of data breaches or ransomware attacks. The critical severity and ease of exploitation (no authentication or user interaction required) mean that European organizations using these devices are at immediate risk. The absence of patches increases exposure time, necessitating urgent mitigation measures. Organizations in sectors with high security requirements or regulatory obligations (e.g., GDPR compliance regarding data protection) face heightened consequences if this vulnerability is exploited.

CWE-497Exposure of Sensitive System Information to an Unauthorized Control Sphere (opens in a new tab)
Base weaknessOWASP Top 10 A01:2025: Broken Access Control (opens in a new tab)
The product does not properly prevent sensitive system-level information from being accessed by unauthorized actors who do not have the same level of access to the underlying system as the product does.
Architecture and Design · Implementation
Production applications should never use methods that generate internal details such as stack traces and error messages unless that information is directly committed to a log that is not viewable by the end user.
OWASP Cheat Sheets
Error Handling (opens in a new tab)
Authorization (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V14.3.2 (opens in a new tab)
V8.3.4 (opens in a new tab)
V14.3.3 (opens in a new tab)
Attack patterns
Web Application Fingerprinting (opens in a new tab)
System Location Discovery (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 19 Sep 2025, 15:59 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-497

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats