CVE-2025-10590VulnerabilityPublished 17 Sep 2025

CVE-2025-10590: Portabilis i-Educar · Cross Site Scripting

Affects Portabilis i-EducarSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 5.3 Medium.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 06:26 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

5.3Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.3% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 26% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Base metrics

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: Passive
Vulnerable system confidentiality: None
Vulnerable system integrity: Low
Vulnerable system availability: None
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Threat metrics

Exploit Maturity: POC

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files of the vulnerable system to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: Passive: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires limited interaction by the targeted user with the vulnerable system and the attacker’s payload. These interactions would be considered involuntary and do not require that the user actively subvert protections built into the vulnerable system.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Exploit Maturity: POC: Based on threat intelligence sources each of the following must apply: · Proof-of-concept is publicly available · No knowledge of reported attempts to exploit this vulnerability · No knowledge of publicly available solutions used to simplify attempts to exploit the vulnerability

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 17 Sep 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-26.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
Portabilis i-Educar	Affected =2.0 =2.1 =2.2 =2.3 =2.4 =2.5 =2.6 =2.7 =2.8 =2.9 =2.10	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

To mitigate this vulnerability, European organizations should first verify if they are running affected versions (2.0 through 2.10) of Portabilis i-Educar and prioritize upgrading to a patched version once available. In the absence of an official patch, organizations should implement input validation and output encoding on the 'ref_pessoa' parameter to neutralize malicious scripts. Web application firewalls (WAFs) can be configured with custom rules to detect and block typical XSS payloads targeting this parameter. Restricting access to the intranet module through network segmentation and VPNs can reduce exposure to external attackers. Additionally, enforcing Content Security Policy (CSP) headers can limit the impact of injected scripts by restricting the sources from which scripts can be loaded. User awareness training to recognize phishing attempts and suspicious links can further reduce the risk of successful exploitation. Continuous monitoring of web server logs for unusual requests targeting 'educar_usuario_det.php' should be implemented to detect exploitation attempts early.

Description

A security flaw has been discovered in Portabilis i-Educar up to 2.10. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file /intranet/educar_usuario_det.php. The manipulation of the argument ref_pessoa results in cross site scripting. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited.

Impact

For European organizations using Portabilis i-Educar, particularly educational institutions and administrative bodies, this vulnerability poses a moderate risk. Successful exploitation could compromise user accounts, including those of students, teachers, and administrators, potentially leading to unauthorized access to sensitive educational records and personal data. The XSS flaw could also be leveraged for phishing attacks or to spread malware within the institution's network. Given the remote and unauthenticated nature of the attack, any exposed i-Educar intranet portals accessible over the internet or poorly segmented internal networks are at risk. The impact on confidentiality and integrity of data is significant, though availability is not directly affected. The medium severity rating suggests that while the threat is not critical, it warrants timely remediation to prevent exploitation, especially considering the public availability of exploit code. European data protection regulations such as GDPR impose strict requirements on protecting personal data, so exploitation could also lead to regulatory and reputational consequences.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 17 Sep 2025, 11:09 UTC

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats