CVE-2025-11487VulnerabilityPublished 8 Oct 2025

CVE-2025-11487: SourceCodester Farm Management System · SQL Injection

Affects SourceCodester Farm Management SystemSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 5.3 Medium.

Data as of 25 Oct 2026, 19:02 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

5.3Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.3% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 28% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Base metrics

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: None
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low
Vulnerable system integrity: Low
Vulnerable system availability: Low
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Threat metrics

Exploit Maturity: POC

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker requires privileges that provide basic capabilities that are typically limited to settings and resources owned by a single low-privileged user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges has the ability to access only non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: Low: Performance is reduced or there are interruptions in resource availability. Even if repeated exploitation of the vulnerability is possible, the attacker does not have the ability to completely deny service to legitimate users. The resources in the Vulnerable System are either partially available all of the time, or fully available only some of the time, but overall there is no direct, serious consequence to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Exploit Maturity: POC: Based on threat intelligence sources each of the following must apply: · Proof-of-concept is publicly available · No knowledge of reported attempts to exploit this vulnerability · No knowledge of publicly available solutions used to simplify attempts to exploit the vulnerability

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 8 Oct 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-25.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
SourceCodester Farm Management System	Affected =1.0	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

1. Immediately implement input validation and sanitization on the 'Type' parameter in /uploadProduct.php to ensure only expected values are accepted. 2. Refactor database queries to use parameterized statements or prepared queries to eliminate SQL injection vectors. 3. Restrict database user permissions to the minimum necessary, preventing unauthorized data manipulation even if injection occurs. 4. Monitor logs for unusual database query patterns or repeated access attempts to /uploadProduct.php. 5. If patch updates become available from SourceCodester, apply them promptly. 6. Consider deploying web application firewalls (WAFs) with custom rules to detect and block SQL injection attempts targeting this endpoint. 7. Conduct security audits and penetration testing focused on input handling in the farm management system. 8. Educate IT staff and users about the risks and signs of exploitation attempts. 9. Isolate the farm management system network segment to limit lateral movement in case of compromise.

Description

A security flaw has been discovered in SourceCodester Farm Management System 1.0. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file /uploadProduct.php. Performing manipulation of the argument Type results in sql injection. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited.

Impact

For European organizations, especially those in the agricultural sector using SourceCodester Farm Management System 1.0, this vulnerability poses risks of unauthorized access to sensitive farm data, including production details, inventory, and possibly financial information. Exploitation could lead to data breaches, manipulation of farm management data, or disruption of operations, impacting business continuity and trust. Given the remote exploitability without authentication, attackers could leverage this vulnerability to gain footholds in networks or pivot to other systems. The impact extends to regulatory compliance risks under GDPR if personal or sensitive data is exposed. Additionally, disruption in farm management systems could affect supply chains and food production, which are critical in Europe. The medium severity indicates a moderate but tangible risk that requires timely attention to prevent escalation.

Summary

CVE-2025-11487 is a SQL injection vulnerability identified in SourceCodester Farm Management System version 1.0. The vulnerability exists in the /uploadProduct.php script, where the 'Type' parameter is not properly sanitized before being used in SQL queries. This allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to inject arbitrary SQL commands by manipulating the 'Type' argument, potentially leading to unauthorized data disclosure, data modification, or denial of service. The vulnerability does not require user interaction or elevated privileges, making it easier to exploit remotely. The CVSS 4.0 score is 5.3 (medium), reflecting moderate impact and exploitability. Although no known exploits are currently active in the wild, the public release of exploit code increases the likelihood of attacks. The vulnerability affects only version 1.0 of the product, which is used in farm management contexts, potentially exposing sensitive agricultural data and operational controls. The lack of patches or official fixes in the provided information suggests that organizations must implement immediate mitigations such as input validation and use of prepared statements to prevent exploitation.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 8 Oct 2025, 17:53 UTC

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats