CVE-2025-11933: CWE-20 Improper Input Validation in wofSSL wolfSSL
Improper Input Validation in the TLS 1.3 CKS extension parsing in wolfSSL 5.8.2 and earlier on multiple platforms allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to potentially cause a denial-of-service via a crafted ClientHello message with duplicate CKS extensions.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2025-11933 is a vulnerability classified under CWE-20 (Improper Input Validation) affecting the wolfSSL library, specifically versions 5.8.2 and earlier. The issue arises in the TLS 1.3 ClientHello message parsing logic, where the CKS (Client Key Share) extension is improperly validated. The vulnerability allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to send a ClientHello message containing duplicate CKS extensions. This malformed input can cause the wolfSSL library to mishandle the message, leading to a denial-of-service (DoS) condition by crashing or hanging the TLS service. The flaw affects multiple platforms since wolfSSL is a widely used lightweight SSL/TLS library embedded in various devices and applications, including IoT devices, industrial control systems, and network appliances. The CVSS 4.0 score is 2.3, reflecting low severity due to the limited impact (availability only), no confidentiality or integrity compromise, and the requirement for some privileges (low privileges) to exploit. No user interaction is needed, and the attack vector is network-based. Currently, no public exploits or patches are available, but the vulnerability is publicly disclosed and should be addressed promptly. The root cause is insufficient validation of the number of CKS extensions in the ClientHello message, violating protocol expectations and causing the TLS handshake to fail or the service to crash.
Potential Impact
The primary impact of CVE-2025-11933 is a denial-of-service condition affecting availability of services using vulnerable wolfSSL versions. For European organizations, this could disrupt critical communications secured by TLS, especially in sectors relying on embedded devices and IoT systems where wolfSSL is prevalent. Industrial control systems, telecommunications infrastructure, and network appliances could experience service outages or degraded performance. Although the vulnerability does not expose sensitive data or allow unauthorized access, the resulting downtime could lead to operational disruptions, financial losses, and reputational damage. Organizations with large-scale deployments of wolfSSL in critical environments are at higher risk. The low CVSS score indicates limited severity, but the ease of triggering DoS remotely without authentication means attackers could exploit this vulnerability to cause targeted disruptions. In Europe, where digital infrastructure and IoT adoption are significant, the impact could be notable if unpatched systems are widespread.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Monitor wolfSSL vendor advisories closely and apply security patches or updated versions as soon as they become available to address CVE-2025-11933. 2. In the absence of an immediate patch, implement network-level filtering or intrusion prevention rules to detect and block TLS ClientHello messages containing duplicate CKS extensions. This can be done by enhancing TLS inspection capabilities on firewalls or dedicated security appliances. 3. Conduct an inventory of all devices and applications using wolfSSL, especially embedded and IoT devices, to identify vulnerable versions. 4. Where possible, isolate critical systems using vulnerable wolfSSL versions from untrusted networks to reduce exposure. 5. Employ rate limiting and anomaly detection on TLS handshake traffic to mitigate potential DoS attempts exploiting this vulnerability. 6. Engage with device and application vendors to confirm wolfSSL versions in use and request updates if necessary. 7. Incorporate wolfSSL version checks into vulnerability management and patching workflows to ensure timely remediation. 8. Educate network security teams about this specific TLS extension parsing vulnerability to improve detection and response capabilities.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Italy, Netherlands, Spain, Sweden
CVE-2025-11933: CWE-20 Improper Input Validation in wofSSL wolfSSL
Description
Improper Input Validation in the TLS 1.3 CKS extension parsing in wolfSSL 5.8.2 and earlier on multiple platforms allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to potentially cause a denial-of-service via a crafted ClientHello message with duplicate CKS extensions.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-2025-11933 is a vulnerability classified under CWE-20 (Improper Input Validation) affecting the wolfSSL library, specifically versions 5.8.2 and earlier. The issue arises in the TLS 1.3 ClientHello message parsing logic, where the CKS (Client Key Share) extension is improperly validated. The vulnerability allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to send a ClientHello message containing duplicate CKS extensions. This malformed input can cause the wolfSSL library to mishandle the message, leading to a denial-of-service (DoS) condition by crashing or hanging the TLS service. The flaw affects multiple platforms since wolfSSL is a widely used lightweight SSL/TLS library embedded in various devices and applications, including IoT devices, industrial control systems, and network appliances. The CVSS 4.0 score is 2.3, reflecting low severity due to the limited impact (availability only), no confidentiality or integrity compromise, and the requirement for some privileges (low privileges) to exploit. No user interaction is needed, and the attack vector is network-based. Currently, no public exploits or patches are available, but the vulnerability is publicly disclosed and should be addressed promptly. The root cause is insufficient validation of the number of CKS extensions in the ClientHello message, violating protocol expectations and causing the TLS handshake to fail or the service to crash.
Potential Impact
The primary impact of CVE-2025-11933 is a denial-of-service condition affecting availability of services using vulnerable wolfSSL versions. For European organizations, this could disrupt critical communications secured by TLS, especially in sectors relying on embedded devices and IoT systems where wolfSSL is prevalent. Industrial control systems, telecommunications infrastructure, and network appliances could experience service outages or degraded performance. Although the vulnerability does not expose sensitive data or allow unauthorized access, the resulting downtime could lead to operational disruptions, financial losses, and reputational damage. Organizations with large-scale deployments of wolfSSL in critical environments are at higher risk. The low CVSS score indicates limited severity, but the ease of triggering DoS remotely without authentication means attackers could exploit this vulnerability to cause targeted disruptions. In Europe, where digital infrastructure and IoT adoption are significant, the impact could be notable if unpatched systems are widespread.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Monitor wolfSSL vendor advisories closely and apply security patches or updated versions as soon as they become available to address CVE-2025-11933. 2. In the absence of an immediate patch, implement network-level filtering or intrusion prevention rules to detect and block TLS ClientHello messages containing duplicate CKS extensions. This can be done by enhancing TLS inspection capabilities on firewalls or dedicated security appliances. 3. Conduct an inventory of all devices and applications using wolfSSL, especially embedded and IoT devices, to identify vulnerable versions. 4. Where possible, isolate critical systems using vulnerable wolfSSL versions from untrusted networks to reduce exposure. 5. Employ rate limiting and anomaly detection on TLS handshake traffic to mitigate potential DoS attempts exploiting this vulnerability. 6. Engage with device and application vendors to confirm wolfSSL versions in use and request updates if necessary. 7. Incorporate wolfSSL version checks into vulnerability management and patching workflows to ensure timely remediation. 8. Educate network security teams about this specific TLS extension parsing vulnerability to improve detection and response capabilities.
Affected Countries
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.2
- Assigner Short Name
- wolfSSL
- Date Reserved
- 2025-10-17T22:15:26.318Z
- Cvss Version
- 4.0
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 6920e83b27835fd566e7934f
Added to database: 11/21/2025, 10:31:23 PM
Last enriched: 12/8/2025, 4:42:55 PM
Last updated: 1/7/2026, 4:17:58 AM
Views: 90
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
CVE-2026-20893: Origin validation error in Fujitsu Client Computing Limited Fujitsu Security Solution AuthConductor Client Basic V2
HighCVE-2025-14891: CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') in ivole Customer Reviews for WooCommerce
MediumCVE-2025-14059: CWE-73 External Control of File Name or Path in roxnor EmailKit – Email Customizer for WooCommerce & WP
MediumCVE-2025-12648: CWE-552 Files or Directories Accessible to External Parties in cbutlerjr WP-Members Membership Plugin
MediumCVE-2025-14631: CWE-476 NULL Pointer Dereference in TP-Link Systems Inc. Archer BE400
HighActions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
Need more coverage?
Upgrade to Pro Console in Console -> Billing for AI refresh and higher limits.
For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.